David Duke Would Really Like It If Jew-Run CNN Would Please Interview Him

The straw that stirred the political drink this week was Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton‘s all-out assault on Donald Trump‘s courtship of the racist “alt-right” and its aftermath. One major player in that kerfuffle, albeit a nearly-invisible one, was David Duke, whose remarks on his own radio show (reported here first) made it into Hillary’s speech:

On David Duke’s radio show the other day, the mood was jubilant. ‘We appear to have taken over the Republican Party,’ one white supremacist said. Duke laughed. ‘No, there’s still more work to do,’ he replied.

Well, that reference formed the basis of David Duke’s show-opening rant about the media, which he consistently points out is controlled by the Jews. He began by complaining that Hillary felt compelled to mention his onetime membership in the Ku Klux Klan, but then also reiterated how proud he was of that resume’ bullet, before moving on to complain that networks like CNN never have him on for interviews:

Have you seen me interview directly, on the subject, on CNN or Fox News or MSNBC? Or ABC, or CBS? And the answer to that is not at all. Think about that.

So what reason does Duke come up with for this media white-out, if you will? Because the guy who just said he was proud to have been in the Ku Klux Klan would come off normal in person, or something:

I think the answer to that is the fact that when people hear me for themselves, they hear quite a different person than the way I’m caricatured, and that’s the right word for it, by the media.

No, you still sound like a creepy bigot in real life.

Duke does make a good point, though, because given the lack of restraint that our news media has shown this election cycle, I really am at a loss to explain why they haven’t had David Duke on. Lord knows a David Duke/Kayleigh McEnany/Don Lemon three-box would do killer ratings, and unlike a Donald Trump rally, no one would get hurt.

This is an opinion piece. The views expressed in this article are those of just the author.