1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser
Advertisement

Republicans: Meet The One Leading Presidential Candidate Who Took Stand Against Individual Mandate

video
» 15 comments

One of the major problems facing Republican presidential frontrunners Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney is their longtime support for a national individual health insurance mandate, a major pillar of the dreaded Obamacare that conservative base voters hate so much. Romney passed an individual mandate as Massachusetts Governor, and expressed support for a national mandate. Gingrich, as Romney forced him to admit, all but thought the idea up. But there is one leading presidential candidate with a long record of opposition to mandating the purchase of health insurance.

I know, Republican voters must be thinking that this is too good to be true, and maybe it is. Let’s meet this anti-mandate candidate:


Yes, the one leading presidential candidate who consistently opposed the individual mandate is the guy who signed it into law. Then-Sen. Barack Obama didn’t just oppose the mandate, he ridiculed it, and used it to attack his primary opponent, then-Sen. Hillary Clinton. Once elected, President Obama was ostensibly pulled to that position by his party.

It is supremely ironic that Gingrich and Romney are trying to get elected by running away from a political position about which they were both 100% correct, while trying to beat the guy who was so completely wrong about that same issue. As Jay Carney pointed out earlier this year, Mitt Romney eloquently defended the individual mandate as a conservative idea:

“Not only have lower courts upheld (the law’s) constitutionality,” Carney began, “but the fact of the individual mandate being both constitutional and wise policy is an opinion shared across the ideological spectrum. A former governor of Massachusetts just said, the other day, ‘The idea for a health care plan in Massachusetts was not mine alone. The Heritage Foundation, a great conservative think tank, helped on that. I’m told Newt Gingrich, one of the very first people who came up with the idea of an individual mandate, did that years and years ago. It was seen as a conservative idea to say, you know what? People have a responsibility for caring for themselves if they can. We’ll help people who can’t care for themselves, but if you can care for yourself, you gotta take care of yourself and pay your own bills.’”

“That’s the former governor of Massachusetts describing the individual mandate, and why it’s smart policy, and we certainly agree.”

The individual mandate is only a hated liberal idea compared to the status quo. In the arena of health care reform, it is a desperate Hail Mary bulwark against a truly universal system like single-payer or Medicare for all. What Republicans ignore about that mandate is exactly what Hillary Clinton knew about it in 2008: it was absolutely key to preserving private insurance companies, while allowing for the prohibition of preexisting condition clauses. You can’t forbid insurance companies from denying coverage based on preexisting conditions unless everyone is required to have insurance.

I’m absolutely certain that candidate Obama knew this, too, but also knew that a mandate would be an easy to demagogue, political non-starter. He elected to sell the teaspoon of sugar, and let the medicine take care of itself later. While Hillary Clinton was absolutely right about the need for an individual mandate, Obama’s campaign against it proved that it would have derailed any candidate who proposed it. It’s fair to criticize his pivot to the mandate as President, but that criticism would mostly come from liberals like me, who would have much preferred a public option to an individual mandate.

This Robamaneycare issue may be good for riling up the conservative base, and the GOP nomination may just end up going to the guy who can best convince voters that he’s “come to Jesus” on the mandate, but it will be interesting to see them convince a general electorate that they’ll be better off if health insurance companies can deny them coverage for preexisting conditions. Even more amusing is that they will be campaigning against a President who never wanted that mandate to begin with.

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • Anonymous

    The only reason Republicans currently oppose a mandate that requires people to pay money directly to corporations is because a black guy signed the bill.

  • Pablo

    Wow! The one candidate who isn’t Michelle Bachmann, Ron Paul, Rick Perry or Rick Santorum! The One!

  • Anonymous

    Well, Pablo, I’m sure he was talking about viable candidates, but feel free to support their nomination.  You can never have too big of a landslide.

  • Anonymous

    did you “adopt” your christmas dinner from the animal shelter yet? heard they got some tasty black labs in…

  • Anonymous

    It’s an article written by Tommy, did you expect it to be factually correct?  Tommy favors sensationalism at the cost of journalistic integrity. 

  • Anonymous

    So again what we have here is someone pointing out that Romney was for a state mandate, but does NOT mentioned that Romney has repeatedly said he is AGAINST a national mandate.

    How in the heck is a national mandate, which will RAISE TAXES on private employers, supposed to protect private insurance companies?! Employers are just going to drop (ugh I wish I could remember the study that just came out on this) their employees from their health care coverage, and you’ll have even more people going on the government program.

    All that means is that private insurance companies are going to RAISE PREMIUMS on the existing employers. No employer in their right mind is going to keep employees on an employer health care program as prices continue to rise.

    A national mandate is the DEATH of private insurance, NOT the savior.

  • Anonymous

    So along with stating to go to Congress before engaging in battle (Libya), treating Al Qaeda as criminals rather than enemy combatants (assination of Bin Laden, drone killings), closing Guantanamo, protecting civil rights (signing NDAA to allow indefinite detention w/o trial of U.S Citizens, expansion of Patriot Act), Obama also reigned on the Health Care individual mandate.  If only Obama was Republican there would be serious democratic opposition and people demonstrating against him as a tyrant on the street.

  • Anonymous

    Tell that to Romney. He endorsed a national mandate. Try clicking the links in the article.
    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/tense-bret-baier-confronts-mitt-romney-over-health-care-mandate/

  • Anonymous

    Technically, Tommy did say “the one *leading* candidate who…”
    Ron Paul is rising, but Bachmann, Perry and Santorum are certainly not leading the polls.

  • Jackson Baer

    Ron Paul will win Iowa and then either win New
    Hampshire or come in a very close second to Romney. Either way, he has a
    legitimate chance to win the Republican nomination. What will the
    Republicans do? They can’t stand Paul because of his foreign policy.

    RON PAUL 2012

    http://www.whatthehellbook.com/the-book/

  • Anonymous

    Ron Paul has 3rd party candidate written all over him. 

  • Anonymous

    And AGAIN, he is NO LONGER supporting a national healthcare mandate. If you want to call it flip-flopping, then fine. But he has repeatedly opposed it throughout the campaign.

  • Anonymous

    Yes…conveniently so because “I’m running for office for pete’s sake.”

  • http://twitter.com/integr8d Michael Vasovski

    ” It’s fair to criticize his pivot to the mandate as President, but that
    criticism would mostly come from liberals like me, who would have much
    preferred a public option to an individual mandate.”

    Umm no. There were plenty on the right that thought he was reasonable and wasn’t going to force everyone into it. That’s how he ‘played it’, before ‘pivoting’.

  • http://twitter.com/Pcipinsurance Pcip

    Very much a controversy – make your decision based on facts not hearsay. If is a difficult one to make but I view the outcomes of both to assist in deciding that marketing this potential life threatening diagnosis to now a solution for coverage and getting that individual coverage is better than anything else we have ant this time. See http://www.preexistingconditioninsuranceplan.com for info rates and coverage

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram