This is insanity to allow this kind of barbarism under the guise of free speech!

I don’t often agree with Sanchez, but he’s correct to be outraged by this!!!

These losers should be tracked down and imprisoned for life. This should not have been aired by sanchez or posted here because these sick losers are getting publicity, imo.

Hey, Rick, why don’t you show the video of your running over that man you hit while you were DUI?

there was no need to show this.

Today’s ruling by the Supreme Court was a great victory for the First Amendment. It was an excellent 8-1 decision by the Chief Justice. True, the underlying speech here is appalling, but you don’t the First Amendment to protect popular speech.

AnonymousFinch says:
April 20, 2010 at 11:19 pm

I’m gonna disagree with you here, Finch. This stuff is no different than showing a person get actually hurt on video. The act seen on camera is illegal, therefore I’m not sure how selling video of an illegal act is legal.

I understand what you’re saying… but I just don’t think this falls under “free speech.”

It’s awful, disgusting, and I’d never willingly watch it, but it still most definitely falls under the protection of free speech. In my opinion, the Supreme Court was 100% right in their ruling.

The video in question is murder. How anyone could call this “free speech” is beyond me.

This is a disgusting video and the people who did this should be charged for their heinous acts. However, years ago there was a video series called “The Faces of Death” which was a video sensation that showed nothing but deaths, some real, some reenactments and that was never considered illegal.

Exactly what kind of free speech is this? Religious? Political? Freedom of the press? What? What is the purpose of this swill? Who actually believes that our founding fathers would have offered protection to the psychopaths peddling these wares? ( I did not watch the video, but will assume the article is truthful in it’s depiction) I think I’ll have to send a letter to my Supreme Court Jesters to express my discontent.

“Only Justice Samuel A. Alito dissented from Tuesday’s decision. He faulted the court for striking down “in its entirety a valuable statute that was enacted not to suppress speech, but to prevent horrific acts of animal cruelty — and in particular, the creation and commercial exploitation of ‘crush videos,’ a form of depraved entertainment that has no social value.”

Although it is heart rendering to do so, I must agree with you Finch. I would also like to have a few minutes alone with the sub-human slime who do this sort of thing. Heck, I’m an old man and would probably get hurt taking out my anger on them but I think I could still probably get in a few good licks before they took me down. They’d damn sure know they’d been in a fight!

LOl @ Free speech. That was laughable.

If anything it would be freedom of expression, and even that’s iffy. The fact is, it’s disgusting, and being that we DO have animal abuse laws, it should be illegal.

Those responsible live in the philippines,

can someone skin those girls alive
that would be really great to hear
them scream in pain. GUILTY human
cries are much better really.

I would gladly to that to those girls!!! >:)
They have no heart!