Good reporting here, Tommy. Many thanks.

Hello,everybody,the good shoping place,the new season approaching, click in. Let’s facelift bar!
===== http://www.fashionsports.org/ ====

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33

UGG BOOT $50

Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33

Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33

Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30

Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12

New era cap $9

Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18

FREE SHIPPING

Since it is nearly impossible to fire a government employee, it is common to assign them to a desk with nothing to do, so they spend the day browsing the Internet. I always wondered how the ones that actually worked put up with this but that wrote it off as “that is the way things work”.

The Real Royal King says:
April 26, 2010 at 8:57 am

Good reporting here, Tommy. Many thanks.

So the above (which contains gems like this: “The Republicans’ response should tell you all you need to know about whether they should be trusted within 500 yards of our economy.”) is your definition of a “report?”

Tommy is advocating his political ideology… and that’s fine, it’s a column, he has every right to voice his biased opinion in this forum. But for you to think it’s a “report,” and not an “editorial,” show’s how warped and confused the left’s opinion of “journalism” truly is. It does go a long way to explain why the far left (as you are) thinks the media is “biased-right.” When a post like this can be called a “report,” you know the scales of reality are WAY off.

SEC Porn story is a prime example of conservative bias in the media.

INB,

it’s no secret that I’m a liberal, but I fail to see what “political ideology” you think I’m advancing here, other than honesty. Despite appearances, one way or the other at times, this is not a partisan issue.

The sentence you zero in on is supported by the facts, but if you have a rebuttal, I’d be glad to hear it.

Only the really stiff necked can go from nearly a complete world-wide financial meltdown in the fall of 2008, to begging for a socialist bailout, to then arguing that there is no need to regulate the securities industry. LOL Of course, the men with the billions of dollars in that industry own more than half the politicians, so no surprise there is so much resistence to regulation.

Politicians come cheap, give them a discount on their mortgages and they are your friends forever.

Goldman wants the regulation. It puts the gov in the position of mitigating the risk of their investments. Wasn’t this in a column here? Or was it some other place?

Goldman was Obama’s largest corporate donor.

“Largest Corporate donor”, now what exactly are we talking about? How much? And since the securities industry itself has been arguing, furiously, against the regulation, it is certainly a dubious notion, at best, that GS would not join them in that regard.

Tommy Christopher says:
April 26, 2010 at 1:41 pm

Tommy… that was more or less my point. You’re entitled to you’re a liberal, and entitled to your opinion. However, those (as I pointed out, like Royal) who can’t differentiate between opinion and fact, have a problem. Believing that your above post is a “report” is not true… as I’m sure you would agree. It’s an editorial… not a straight news piece.

it’s no secret that I’m a liberal, but I fail to see what “political ideology” you think I’m advancing here, other than honesty.

You’re advancing your own political ideology, most closely aligned with the liberal end of the spectrum. Again, that doesn’t mean you can’t occasionally criticize your own side… only that 9 times out of 10, you’re presenting their point of view more favorably, and with an air of advocacy, towards those ideas.

The sentence you zero in on is supported by the facts, but if you have a rebuttal, I’d be glad to hear it.

Yes, and a similar set of “facts” could be arranged to show that Democrats shouldn’t “be within 500 yards of our economy,” couldn’t it? Just because you believe that “opinion” to be “fact,” doesn’t make it so. And that’s really the point. Some folks (like Royal) can’t quite seem to tell the difference between fact and opinion… and increasingly, that is becoming a problem.

It’s nice that you wrapped everything up in a nice little ball and the blaring headline certainly draws attention, but I linked the list and made reference to this being an old story in the previous thread and several people on Gawker made comment when the Grassley leak surfaced that the SEC/Porn story was one listed in John Cook’s farewell “best of”.

So, yeah, you’ve added some to the timeline and should be commended, but I’m not sure of the “Breaking” part of the title unless it’s there for irony or something.

BTW: I first heard of this story on Wonkette, who was reporting on a Dealbreaker post and as far as I can tell everything goes back to the Washington Times

LOL Of course, the men with the billions of dollars in that industry own more than half the politicians, so no surprise there is so much resistence to regulation.
micro sd

2011 new style on sale now!!

http://www.nike4world.com