Cookie “Monsters” maybe.

So does this mean Rosie is no longer a Troofer?

Which is what the libs here at Mediaite would be saying if Bush were in office. But since Obama gave the kill order they can’t do that. What a dilemna.

The world was waiting “Breathlessly” to get this
Lardass dykes take on the event, for sure!

Too late for that Ms Rossie.

Given Fox News’ current love fest for OBL, no doubt they’ll be hiring Rosie as a commentator.

Obama said:

I think that anyone who would question that the perpetrator of mass murder on American soil didn’t deserve what he got needs to have their head examined.

‘Nuff said.

Rosie O’Donnell: Without Due Process For Bin Laden, We May Be ‘Monsters’. Notice Rosie, just as all the left wing douchebags that have spewed before her, qualifies what president Barack Hussein Obama ll clearly takes full credit and responsibility for carrying out as the ” Royal We ” as being MONSTERS.

Yet back in the Bush / Cheney administration the two of them ( evil empire ) arbitrarily acted alone, therefore bore all responsibility for any and everything that happened on their watch.

This is just one more blatent example of the degenerate liberals giving the ‘ Affirmative Action Jackson ‘ president not only a free one day, one incident pass, but a four year free ride, just as he has been recieving ever since arriving on our shores from who knows where.

Who says black people have it so much worse than everybody else in America? Obviously they are mistaken or merely full of ____.

She’s such a moron.

There’s no crystal clear answer to if it was good that Usama Bin Laden got shot straight away, but Rosie O’Donnell is on the right track for once.

You libturds are so confused on what to think/say/do now….it’s actually not funny.

“An idealist is someone who smells a rose and decides that since it smells better than cabbage, it must make better soup.”

- H.L. Menken

An astute observation and one that fits this idiot’s lack of analytical thought perfectly. Oh, and you can throw Noam Chomsky in the pile of imbeciles who can’t think past their idealism, too.

Fools.

I have no use for Rosie at all, but she does point out a critical point for the left. If they are to be consistent, they have to go the way she and Michael Moore are going on this topic. And that puts them squarely in opposition to the “they need to have their heads examined” president.

Their dilemma is “Do we oppose Obama for doing something Bush would do, even though it supposedly helps the party shed its ‘weak on defense’ label”? It’s funny watching them all squirm around this problem.

14th

I wish there were a way to transfer the animus that lefties like O’Donnell maintain for “fratboys” (and lacrosse players) to muslim terrorists.

One thing is for sure, no matter how much people bitch and moan about the morality of killing OBL, nothing will change because of it. It’s just more clutter for the news stations and blogs until we hop back on the 9% bandwagon.

This is what separates Rosie and her ilk from the typical blind following liberals. Rosie really means what she says and believes (as do other groups like communists, marxists, etc) and as much as I disagree with her on EVERYTHING she says, at least she is consistent.

The blind faith Obama followers only believe we NEED to have a democrat as president and have no problem that it requires the utmost hypocrisy to keep it up.

Paul G said:
You libturds are so confused on what to think/say/do now….it’s actually not funny.

Does this mean you agree with this hot air balloon?

Liberal Tormentor said:
Which is what the libs here at Mediaite would be saying if Bush were in office. But since Obama gave the kill order they can’t do that. What a dilemna.

They’ll be along any moment now to rip Rosie a new one. Any…minute…now…

First of all, I’d like to ask who produces the screensaver for the radio clips?
Is it provided by the individual programs or does Mediaite select the images?

As for the what Ms. O’Donnell says, I agree in theory.

I was also somewhat uncomfortable with the jubilant reactions because by having an exaggerated response, we seemed to be assigning him more importance than he deserved and because somebody did die. The vast majority of people heard the news, thought about it and may have been happy, but they didn’t have a balloon drop or call out a marching band. (Of course most of those with the celebratory initial reaction were in New York, so there may be something about the proximity to Ground Zero which helped fuel the response)

Also, I too was struck by how young the revelers were on that first night. I didn’t attend and mostly watched via CNN.com’s live feeds and Twitter, but I wasn’t the only one who noticed the crowd’s relative youth and others likened the celebrations to the party/riot after a big basketball game.

But, a choice or decision was made and though a trial may have been nice, I don’t know that it’s entirely certain he would’ve been convicted due to the limitations placed on the prosecution by the need to protect sources and methods in an on-going intelligence effort. Plus, Rosie mentions “The Hague” as a possible venue, but The Netherlands isn’t too far from Denmark and they also got caught-up in the cartoon reaction, so I don’t know they’d be eager to try the leader of a terrorist army who could still have soldiers in the field and whose defense could inspire more

It’s a hard call, but a decision was made and there’s really no doubt that the ultimate outcome would’ve been the same because even if Mr. bin Laden had gotten off on a technicality, I’m sure the CIA would’ve finished the job. (And yes, I feel a little dirty, but war, international diplomacy and global politics isn’t always a clean game)

RowdyHoward said:
Does this mean you agree with this hot air balloon?

Despite being an idiot, she is consistent in adhering to her demented principles. She doesn’t have to spin like a top in trying to discuss the situation.

Vindication: When the loudest critic of your policies achieves his greatest success because of them.

It might be entertaining to hear Rosie’s ideas on how we should have brought OBL to justice.

Thank you Rosie for reminding us about the Constitution, it is funny how many people excuse something like the assassination of OBL without due process. Now we are going after the Ooga Booga man in Yemen who is a US citizen, funny how people don’t seem to have a problem with that either.

What happens when Obama says hey tea party extremists you are being terrorists and goes after them without due process either. Seriously people when you excuse this kind of stuff, you are opening yourselves to a whole world of trouble. I noticed the comments ripping Rosie, that’s fine she is an easy target. But the point she makes is very important. If you don’t think they wont eventually go after “right wing extremists” you are a fool.

Harry Flashman said:
“An idealist is someone who smells a rose and decides that since it smells better than cabbage, it must make better soup.”

- H.L. Menken

An astute observation and one that fits this idiot’s lack of analytical thought perfectly. Oh, and you can throw Noam Chomsky in the pile of imbeciles who can’t think past their idealism, too.

Fools.

Noam Chomsky would eat you for breakfast intellectually.

Pablo said:
They’ll be along any moment now to rip Rosie a new one. Any…minute…now…

You have to admit, it’s equally funny watching the right agree with truthers and activists from the left…who only many months ago made them cringe.

Again, the hypocrisy is seemingly thick from both sides.

Edith Massey said:
Noam Chomsky would eat you for breakfast intellectually.

I personally can’t wait for the Harry Flashman/Noam Chomsky debate on foreign policy. That would be funny.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Which is what the libs here at Mediaite would be saying if Bush were in office. But since Obama gave the kill order they can’t do that. What a dilemna.

Bullshit, killing a wanted man without due process is wrong no matter who does it.

“Rosie also reveals that she expects America to be an example for how we want other countries to act”

Be an example of how other countries should act? Don’t make me laugh. Maybe we should learn a thing or two from Northern neighbors about how to act. They don’t seem to be so filled with hatred for each other like in this country.

(I need to write quickly as I need to leave.) No, she’s wrong. The regular court system, with all it’s protections, is available to CITIZENS.

The reason the military exists is to deal with people/issues that are OUTSIDE our system. It’s too bad the liberal school system has this all screwed up.

It makes no sense to put someone like Bin Laden or any terrorist up before a judge and jury and expect them to follow our rules.

The court system is for people who have some connection to our culture. The courts were never designed to deal with people who have no allegiance to the country. Again, this is why the military can go out and do things far beyond what normal police can do.

We also limit what the military can do within our borders because we assume the people within our borders generally follow the rules that we have all agreed to.

Since the terrorists never agreed to our rules and in fact want to destroy our system, our court system is inadequate. This should be obvious.

DaTruth said:
I have no use for Rosie at all, but she does point out a critical point for the left. If they are to be consistent, they have to go the way she and Michael Moore are going on this topic. And that puts them squarely in opposition to the “they need to have their heads examined” president.

Their dilemma is “Do we oppose Obama for doing something Bush would do, even though it supposedly helps the party shed its ‘weak on defense’ label”? It’s funny watching them all squirm around this problem.

I don’t see much squirming, sure you have liberals who are going to defend the president no matter what he does, and I have no time for those people much in the same way I had no time for the Bushbots who defended everything he did including torture, the Katrina mess, the wars, rendition etc.

I slam our current President for all the same behavior minus Katrina, Obama is continuing a lot of bad Bush policies, the only difference between them is he actually gets results, especially on the “war on terror”. But there are some liberals like myself who call Obama out on stuff when he is wrong, like killing someone without due process of the law. Not to mention he is trying to kill a US citizen in Yemen right now.

Pablo said:
Despite being an idiot, she is consistent in adhering to her demented principles. She doesn’t have to spin like a top in trying to discuss the situation.

Vindication: When the loudest critic of your policies achieves his greatest success because of them.

I agree, she is certainly sticking to what she believes. One thing I can certainly agree with Trump on and that’s his contempt for Rosie…never did like her.

I’m also not really concerned with the outcome of OBL, I think Americans might be better off worrying about the bigger problems that will affect us in the near future. Too much time already has been wasted on this topic.

Lots of back patting and criticism from both sides…everyone’s focus is in the wrong place right now

Edith Massey said:
I personally can’t wait for the Harry Flashman/Noam Chomsky debate on foreign policy. That would be funny.

I think it would be more sad than anything. At least Harry could live up to his name, because when he finds out who he’s debating, he’ll be gone in a FLASH, MAN!

Edith Massey said:
Thank you Rosie for reminding us about the Constitution, it is funny how many people excuse something like the assassination of OBL without due process. Now we are going after the Ooga Booga man in Yemen who is a US citizen, funny how people don’t seem to have a problem with that either. What happens when Obama says hey tea party extremists you are being terrorists and goes after them without due process either. Seriously people when you excuse this kind of stuff, you are opening yourselves to a whole world of trouble. I noticed the comments ripping Rosie, that’s fine she is an easy target. But the point she makes is very important. If you don’t think they wont eventually go after “right wing extremists” you are a fool.

So, why exactly should Osama Bin Laden be given the rights of an American Citizen?

DaTruth said:
I have no use for Rosie at all, but she does point out a critical point for the left. If they are to be consistent, they have to go the way she and Michael Moore are going on this topic. And that puts them squarely in opposition to the “they need to have their heads examined” president.

Their dilemma is “Do we oppose Obama for doing something Bush would do, even though it supposedly helps the party shed its ‘weak on defense’ label”? It’s funny watching them all squirm around this problem.

I couldn’t agree more. Obama has no principled positions on anything as long as he is facing re-election- nor do his Left wing supporters in the media. I disagree with everything that Rosie O’Donnell, Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky stand for, but at least they are consistent and don’t change their principles like they change their clothes.

Obama’s lack of a moral compass is on vivid display when he authorizes a kill order on bin Laden, yet he will not speak out against prosecuting the CIA officers, as Debra Burlingame asked him about, nor will he speak out on the SEALs who are being court martialed for allegedly punching a terrorist in the nose. According to Obama, assassinating a terrorist is good, waterboarding or punching a terrorist is bad.

BTW, no one is even discussing the three other men and one woman who were killed in the raid in Abbotobad. Was their killing good or bad, Libs? Try to be consistent.

Kitsune said:
So, why exactly should Osama Bin Laden be given the rights of an American Citizen?

What exempts OBL or anyone else to due process? Is it cause he is a terrorist? You can defend this all you wish, but don’t be surprised when this administration or a future President comes after you or me or anyone else. You do realize that it is now legal for the President to assassinate anyone he chooses without due process, presenting evidence or legal representation all things which our Constitution protects.

People talk a good game about “defending and loving the Constitution”, but when our Constitution demands us to do something difficult, most people show that they hate our Constitution and our freedoms awarded us under our framing document.

Her back looks fine. The chair she’s in looks very comfortable. Her back is fine.

TillieGlockenspiel said:
I couldn’t agree more. Obama has no principled positions on anything as long as he is facing re-election- nor do his Left wing supporters in the media. I disagree with everything that Rosie O’Donnell, Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky stand for, but at least they are consistent and don’t change their principles like they change their clothes.

Obama’s lack of a moral compass is on vivid display when he authorizes a kill order on bin Laden, yet he will not speak out against prosecuting the CIA officers, as Debra Burlingame asked him about, nor will he speak out on the SEALs who are being court martialed for allegedly punching a terrorist in the nose. According to Obama, assassinating a terrorist is good, waterboarding or punching a terrorist is bad.

BTW, no one is even discussing the three other men and one woman who were killed in the raid in Abbotobad. Was their killing good or bad, Libs? Try to be consistent.

The sad thing is if Bush had done this you would still be celebrating.

RowdyHoward said:
You have to admit, it’s equally funny watching the right agree with truthers and activists from the left…who only many months ago made them cringe.

Again, the hypocrisy is seemingly thick from both sides.

Indeed. LIke everything else, this gets tossed into the the left/right, liberal/conservative, Republican/Democrat food fight when it should not be. This was an action taken be America for Americans. Period.

If Rosie has a problem with it, she can move to whatever country will tolerate her. Besides, doesn’t she know that fire doesn’t melt steel?

Liberal Tormentor said:
Which is what the libs here at Mediaite would be saying if Bush were in office. But since Obama gave the kill order they can’t do that. What a dilemna.

Yep. And conversely, conservatives are playing the liberal “was this legal” card. The real dilemma here is that a liberal president used information gleaned by actions of a conservative administration to take an action that is patently opposite what everyone thinks of him. This odffers more dilemmas abd logic loops than a Kafka play.

For me, I am just happy to know that bin Laden is dead, dead, dead.

Someone please explain to me why we care what this POS says about anything?

Rosie O’Donnell? Who cares? LOL…..

Edith says:

Bullshit, killing a wanted man without due process is wrong no matter who does it.

Funny, since Mediaite has been full of libs praising it the last week.

Edith Massey said:
The sad thing is if Bush had done this you would still be celebrating.

No we wouldn’t be “celebrating” – we chalk it up to “ugly things that happen when good men try to fight terrorists”.
You didn’t see us “celebrating” when any of the events under Bush took place. We accepted the fact that our Government had to go to extreme measures to avoid the terrorists bringing their ugly game to our shores. No celebration, just honest acknowledgement that the terrorists are not your garden variety thugs that our court system is capable of dealing with.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Edith says:

Bullshit, killing a wanted man without due process is wrong no matter who does it.

Funny, since Mediaite has been full of libs praising it the last week.

Funny that when you see a”lib” agreeing it was wrong…you can’t acknowledge. Who’s laughing now?

RowdyHoward said:
You have to admit, it’s equally funny watching the right agree with truthers and activists from the left…who only many months ago made them cringe.

Again, the hypocrisy is seemingly thick from both sides.

I don’t agree with her, and I don’t see any of the conservatives agreeing with her. The hypocrisy resides solely on the left here. Things you hated when they happened under Bush, you applaud when Obama does them.

Why water board when cold blooded murder is an option?
Of course one has to be a Liberal dictator in order to get away with it in the biased media!!

4dogasthome said:
Someone please explain to me why we care what this POS says about anything?

Actually, I have no idea except that for some in the media, celebrity political opinions matter. It has always been a mystery to me why they offer the opinions and why the media makes such a big deal out of them.

By the way, memo to Rosie the loudmouth – bin Laden and his followers would offer you no “due process.” Just a public stoning. Try to remember that next time you decide to open your cakehole for something besides food.

Pablo said:
I don’t agree with her, and I don’t see any of the conservatives agreeing with her. The hypocrisy resides solely on the left here. Things you hated when they happened under Bush, you applaud when Obama does them.

Are you attempting to know what my views are towards the Bush admin? Or are you addressing me as if I’m part of the left?

I haven’t seen anyone post about Bush on this thread (aside from your homies on the right)

…did I miss something?

Pablo said:
They’ll be along any moment now to rip Rosie a new one. Any…minute…now…

…also, I’d say you suck at predictions, I haven’t really seen anyone “rip her a new one”

Except for your boy Trump!

…but that was ages ago.

Probably NOT wrong said:
The world was waiting “Breathlessly” to get this
Lardass dykes take on the event, for sure!

Oh, except for this little weirdo, but you guys are on the same team, right?

(no pun intended)

seek said:
No we wouldn’t be “celebrating” – we chalk it up to “ugly things that happen when good men try to fight terrorists”.You didn’t see us “celebrating” when any of the events under Bush took place. We accepted the fact that our Government had to go to extreme measures to avoid the terrorists bringing their ugly game to our shores. No celebration, just honest acknowledgement that the terrorists are not your garden variety thugs that our court system is capable of dealing with.

Not saying it supports one side or the other, but either way, a OBL trial would have been a nightmare cicrus. Chances are no country is willing to hold him, so he gets tried as a civilian in NYC (mere blocks away from Ground Zero) instead of as a combatant, the ACLU gets involved on OBL’s behalf, college kids protest, holding up “FREE OSAMA” signs. We never hear the end of it from CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News; sympathetic Jihadis would know EXACTLY where OBL is… as would overzealous vigilantes itching at a chance to take him out…

Regardless of what side of the fence you come down on…. it’d be a mess.

Edith Massey said:
What exempts OBL or anyone else to due process? Is it cause he is a terrorist? You can defend this all you wish, but don’t be surprised when this administration or a future President comes after you or me or anyone else. You do realize that it is now legal for the President to assassinate anyone he chooses without due process, presenting evidence or legal representation all things which our Constitution protects.

What part of “at war with” is elusive. This guy was not some criminal here in America. He was the leader of a war against America. And, as such, he is a fair target. The amazing leap of logic from killing the leader of the enemy forces to the concept of randomly killing common criminals in America is staggering.

It is not now legal to assassinate anyone. And as far as authority, remember that Congress, the UN and NATO granted that authority after 9/11. I know it is all a little fuzzy and mixed in with the traditional partisan hate fest, but the authority exists and was properly exercised.

As a Jew, I am constantly amazed that people question the logic of simply killing an enemy of this magnitude. We have been mass slaughtered to nearly the point of extinction more than once and each time, the elimination of a handful of truly evil enemies might have stopped it. Well, bin Laden sought the death of all Americans. And by removing him from the gene pool, we weaken that enemy.

Remember how everyone was shocked when Clinton missed him? And when he escaped Tora Bora? “Oh, we almost had him dead,” was the lament both times. “Couldn’t pull the trigger on him,” was the complaint both times. And now that we did pull the trigger on this waste of air, the same people are worried about the niceties.

Grow up, It is an ugly world outside these borders and never forget who and how this nation enjoys the bubble of peace we have.

Pablo said:
They’ll be along any moment now to rip Rosie a new one. Any…minute…now…

Keeva said:

By the way, memo to Rosie the loudmouth – bin Laden and his followers would offer you no “due process.” Just a public stoning. Try to remember that next time you decide to open your cakehole for something besides food.

…and this one. Don’t forget, nobody gets more upset about sexual orientation than the right!

Pay attention Oprah, no on e is gonna want to watch this gal on your network.

Dem4Ever said:
It might be entertaining to hear Rosie’s ideas on how we should have brought OBL to justice.

I would not want to waste the time in my life….

Pablo, honey? Come to Flooorida

RowdyHoward said:
…and this one. Don’t forget, nobody gets more upset about sexual orientation than the right!

What does not wearing the hijab and bur’qa have to do with sexual orientation?

RowdyHoward said:
…also, I’d say you suck at predictions, I haven’t really seen anyone “rip her a new one”

Except for your boy Trump!

…but that was ages ago.

hyperbole right over your head there sweets. Call me crazy but I don’t think he was referring to the light weights in here for the ripping.

Other than you wanting to get Trump’s name down – has nothing to do with this story. Focus my good man, focu (and please read) – predictions don’t refer to two minutes from now.

Rosie the Donut has no clue. Due process??? This is a freaking war, you moron!!

God!! What an idiot!

RowdyHoward said:
Pablo, honey? Come to Flooorida

Nice Jerky Boys quote.

seek said:
hyperbole right over your head there sweets. Call me crazy but I don’t think he was referring to the light weights in here for the ripping.

Other than you wanting to get Trump’s name down – has nothing to do with this story. Focus my good man, focu (and please read) – predictions don’t refer to two minutes from now.

Right…it was posted an hour and a half ago… also, “they’ll be along any moment now” is kind of an immediate prediction meant for this thread

Nice try though…

RowdyHoward said:
Right…it was posted an hour and a half ago… also, “they’ll be along any moment now” is kind of an immediate prediction meant for this thread

Nice try though…

Still too high for you I guess – get a chair. He proved his point bright-eyes

seek said:
Still too high for you I guess – get a chair. He proved his point bright-eyes

Yeah, you sound to high

Oh, jeez..make that too high!

Does this mean Rosie is disagreeing with her champion, Obimbo? Looks like the list of blind Obimbo followers is one less. Once more Obimbo has to fall back and implement Bush’s plan, to the dismay of the Liberal sheeple.

What seems to allude the left wing talking heads..Rosie O’Donnell,Michael Moore..
(1) the incredible cost the trial would have cost billions,to come to the same forgone conclusion..guilty.
(2) world and national security..every single Islamic fundamentalist would have put becoming a martyr on their to do list during the trial that very well would have lasted years. no place would have been a safe venue.
(3) and just think of the throngs of crazies and the The Candlelight Vigils on the day of the execution
The Media Circus..Do you really want people who lost loved ones on Sept 11 2001 to have to relive the pain over and over again? worst yet..what if he was only given a life sentence?

What seems very clear is that these celebrities who are isolated in their Ivory towers with little or no contact with every day people (working class) is that we thank our Military for saving us the trouble,cost and possible overreaction during a long drawn-out trial.

Bin Laden had enough blood on his hands,why give him and his followers to honor him with even more death and destruction?

RowdyHoward said:
Are you attempting to know what my views are towards the Bush admin? Or are you addressing me as if I’m part of the left?

I’m pointing out that the source of your claimed amusement (watching the right agree with truthers and activists from the left) does not exist.

RowdyHoward said:
…also, I’d say you suck at predictions, I haven’t really seen anyone “rip her a new one”

That was a little thing called sarcasm. It may have gone right over your head.

ROSIE IS A TERRORIST HUGGER…..KICK HER BIG BUTT TO PAKISTAN…..SHE CAN LIVE WITH BINADENS WIVES……..IM SURE THEY HAVE A BIG ENOUGH ROOM FOR HER ………..

Looks like Rosie is out being provocative so she can get some cheap promotion for her show on OWN.
You know the new TV station OWNed by Oprah, that is losing money faster than the Mississippi River can over flow its banks.

Osama bin Laden was a terrorist who murder thousands of people from all around the world in New York, he declared war on America and the world, we were at war with Bin Laden and we are still at war with Islam.

Rosie, the 911 victims didn’t get due process, so what are you foolishly talking about? Rosie is not very informed or intelligent; her statements demand that verdict.

Pablo said:
I’m pointing out that the source of your claimed amusement (watching the right agree with truthers and activists from the left) does not exist.

That was a little thing called sarcasm. It may have gone right over your head.

So you were being sarcastic when you claimed the left would be ripping on Rosie o Dumpling, not the right?

Oh Pablo, yoou soo funny!!

TerryDo said:
Osama bin Laden was a terrorist who murder thousands of people from all around the world in New York, he declared war on America and the world, we were at war with Bin Laden and we are still at war with Islam.

Actually, we are not at war with Islam, no matter how much that gets repeated. We are at war with Islamic radicals who have twisted the religion to justify their murderous ways. There is a difference.

RowdyHoward said:
Pablo, honey? Come to Flooorida

Are you washing your ass?

b-dob said:
Are you washing your ass?

Haha! Nice!

I just wonder If Rosie has a clue of what radical Islam thinks of her chosen alternative lifestyle?
she would neither receive a trial or mercy.not that their is anything wrong with it..

I guess this is her attempt to be cool or cutting edge,or even relevant…America saw her the tip of the iceberg of her mentality (or lack their of) the day she blind sided Tom Selleck on her show

I bet she longs for those days of her pretended love affair with fellow loon Tom Cruise.(I’m sure America is on the edge of their chairs awaiting his two cents on this)

while we are taking roll call..where is Janeane Garofalo on Americas turning a blind eye to Bin Ladens civil liberties? I cant wait for her to chime in (sic)

Another lefty in the long line of lefties who disapprove of President “I take NO Prisioners” Obama.

thatVeteran said:
I just wonder If Rosie has a clue of what radical Islam thinks of her chosen alternative lifestyle?

Nope, she does not. She has no concept of radical Islam. Just her speaking out would be enough for a death sentence on radical Islam, let alone her lifestyle.

thatVeteran said:
I guess this is her attempt to be cool or cutting edge,or even relevant…America saw her the tip of the iceberg of her mentality (or lack their of) the day she blind sided Tom Selleck on her show

This is her hate for actual America thing showing through. The blind side of Selleck over gun rights was just an opening act for her. She also thinks only she should have free speech and that only America commits war crimes – and even then only Republicans, according to Rosie the Revolting.

BatBoy said:
Another lefty in the long line of lefties who disapprove of President “I take NO Prisioners” Obama.

Yep. Kind of entertaining, isn’t it?

Rosie disagrees with Obama? “This is nothing but racism pure and simple”… Garrafalo

Thoughts?…

Osama was obvioulsy on the terror list- but the question remains is if it was absolutely impossible to take Osama alive or if the SEAL were ordered to kill. Clearly none of the congressional leaders were notified until after the fact, and since the general public will never see video of the actual take down, we will never know. We only have the WH version of facts. Either way – good riddance to the scum Osama.

Posted by the NY Times in 2002

President Bush has provided written legal authority to the C.I.A. to hunt down and kill the terrorists without seeking further approval each time the agency is about to stage an operation. Some officials said the terrorist list was known as the ”high-value target list.” A spokesman for the White House declined to discuss the list or issues involving the use of lethal force against terrorists.

Despite the authority given to the agency, Mr. Bush has not waived the executive order banning assassinations, officials said. The presidential authority to kill terrorists defines operatives of Al Qaeda as enemy combatants and thus legitimate targets for lethal force.
The creation of the secret list is part of the expanded C.I.A. effort to hunt and kill or capture Qaeda operatives far from traditional battlefields, in countries like Yemen.

The president is not legally required to approve each name added to the list, nor is the C.I.A. required to obtain presidential approval for specific attacks, although officials said Mr. Bush had been kept well informed about the agency’s operations.
Counterterrorism officials prefer to capture senior Qaeda leaders for interrogation, if possible. They regard killing as a last resort in cases in which the location of a Qaeda operative is known but capture would be too dangerous or logistically impossible, the officials said.

Under current intelligence law, the president must sign a finding to provide the legal basis for covert actions to be carried out by the C.I.A. In response to past abuses, the decision-making process has grown into a highly formalized review in which the White House, Justice Department, State Department, Pentagon and C.I.A. take part.

The administration must notify Congressional leaders of any covert action finding signed by the president. In the case of the presidential finding authorizing the use of lethal force against members of Al Qaeda, Congressional leaders have been notified as required, the officials said.

People such as this animal make me wonder why we are oppossed to Islamic extremism. Why oppose an ideology and “religion” that would have this….thing under a burqa?

Seriously though, Rosie really is a complete and utter twit.

P.S. sorry about my terrible spelling. I rarely edit my comments, especially when i’m ANGRY.

This is one democrat who didn’t think that murdering maggot deserved any ‘due proccess’! If she is doing this for publicity for her stupid TV show it will backfire on the dumbass because there are too many Americans who know people or had a relative die on 9-11.

Pablo said:
I’m pointing out that the source of your claimed amusement (watching the right agree with truthers and activists from the left) does not exist.

That was a little thing called sarcasm. It may have gone right over your head.

Haha! He conveniently uses sarcasm as an excuse when he clearly read his side wrong!! They are they ones attacking her the most here!!

Too funny, Pablo, honey!

Why don’t these idiots know what battles to fight?

Are they so desperate for attention?

Anybody that’s ever tied one on the night before only to wakeup the next day next to something that looks like this knows the meaning of what a monster truly is.

RowdyHoward said:
Haha! He conveniently uses sarcasm as an excuse when he clearly read his side wrong!! They are they ones attacking her the most here!!

Too funny, Pablo, honey!

Wait, so now you’re saying that, sarcasm aside, I was right? You need to figure out what the hell you’re trying to say, Roddy, and try again. You can start with noting that I didn’t mention the right, aside from noting your imaginary observation.

Pablo said:
Wait, so now you’re saying that, sarcasm aside, I was right? You need to figure out what the hell you’re trying to say, Roddy, and try again. You can start with noting that I didn’t mention the right, aside from noting your imaginary observation.

Ha! Go read your first post, you were referring to the left ripping O’ Dumpling a new one over this, No?

Pablo said:
They’ll be along any moment now to rip Rosie a new one. Any…minute…now…

When I showed you quotes of posters who fell into your category, you claimed sarcasm…please explain what you meant.

It’s not a big deal, more funny than anything…but everyone knows you meant the left would attack her…they really didn’t…it was the posters from the right who had the most foul things to say…it’s funny to watch you back track though…I hope you continue!

Pablo, be nice to Rowdy Howdy! The poor lad is so discombobulated that he’s off to find some talking points lying around the waste basket at NOW.

RowdyHoward said:
When I showed you quotes of posters who fell into your category, you claimed sarcasm…please explain what you meant.

First you said I was wrong and you’re now claiming that you proved I was right. Which is it?

seek said:
Pablo, be nice to Rowdy Howdy! The poor lad is so discombobulated that he’s off to find some talking points lying around the waste basket at NOW.

Try making sense next time Bro Montana!

I’m sorry your right wing vision has clouded you and your comrade Pablo Honey’s ability to see why his first post was so funny!

Pablo said:
First you said I was wrong and you’re now claiming that you proved I was right. Which is it?

Visit page 2 and catch up. You’ve always been wrong…how many times to we need to bang it into that skull Pablo, honey?

You hoped the left would attack, they didn’t…there were more righties attacking, you just can’t admit you were wrong in your “sarcastic” (sounds more like oops, I’m wrong, so I’ll play the sarcasm card here) prediction.

Unless you care to explain that first post…come on Palo, dance honey! Dance!

At least Rosie has remained true to her demented ideals. Not like the rest of the lemmings, playing twister with this news.

RowdyHoward said:
Unless you care to explain that first post…come on Palo, dance honey! Dance!

Why don’t you read it again? Pay attention to what I quoted. And think as hard as you can.

Pablo said:
Why don’t you read it again? Pay attention to what I quoted. And think as hard as you can.

Hey cop-out, I’ve read and re-posted it 3 times.

I smell the fear on you.

Rosie and Michael Moore should get married and make ugly liberal children.

Liberal Tormentor said:
Which is what the libs here at Mediaite would be saying if Bush were in office. But since Obama gave the kill order they can’t do that. What a dilemna.

Ah yes, but Obama didn’t give the order first, it was already said some time ago..

Bin Laden is wanted: dead or alive, says Bush

By Toby Harnden in Washington 12:01AM BST 18 Sep 2001
PRESIDENT Bush said yesterday that he wanted Osama bin Laden, the Saudi exile, “dead or alive” in some of the most bellicose language used by a White House occupant in recent years.

“I want justice,” he said after a meeting at the Pentagon, where 188 people were killed last Tuesday when an airliner crashed into the building. “And there’s an old poster out West that says, ‘Wanted: Dead or Alive.’ ”

He then seemed to temper his remarks by adding: “All I want and America wants is to see them brought to justice. That’s what we want.”

The blunt, Texas-style rhetoric, delivered off the cuff, came a day after Vice-President Dick Cheney said he would willingly accept bin Laden’s “head on a platter”. Some advisers said that although the comments might be popular in America, they would not be welcomed by European or Arab allies.

Mr Bush had just received a briefing on the call-up of military reservists and plans for Operation Noble Eagle, the name given to the “war on terrorism” that the president has vowed to prosecute

Liberal Tormentor said:
Which is what the libs here at Mediaite would be saying if Bush were in office. But since Obama gave the kill order they can’t do that. What a dilemna.

This is all a great example of showing how liberals have no standards. If Bush had done this, many liberals would be going berserk and we’d be hearing how Bin Laden was really a victim.

If we could switch back and forth between the two realities and show the liberals in each reality what their counter parts were doing, they versions of liberal wouldn’t even agree. This is what I mean when i say they have no standards: they really don’t! It’s like showing an alcoholic in denial the bottle they just drank: they won’t admit to drinking it.

Alz said:
This is all a great example of showing how liberals have no standards. If Bush had done this, many liberals would be going berserk and we’d be hearing how Bin Laden was really a victim.

If we could switch back and forth between the two realities and show the liberals in each reality what their counter parts were doing, they versions of liberal wouldn’t even agree. This is what I mean when i say they have no standards: they really don’t! It’s like showing an alcoholic in denial the bottle they just drank: they won’t admit to drinking it.

You are absolutely right! It’s been funny (but sad, actually) to watch them since last Sunday night. They seem to live with a large, dark hole through their middles where the cold wind pours through. Pursued by a thousand forms of fear, the Libs don’t have any standards at all. “Stand for something, or you will fall for anything.”

Rosie, ‘fire doesn’t melt metal’ O’Donnell, Queen of 9/11 Truthers, doesn’t think Bin Laden was responsible for Sep. 11, so it’s no shock the idiot doesn’t think the US should have taken him out.

Armchair soldiers… you have the most dangerous man in front of you wearing baggy clothing in his hideout and you’re suppose to just apprehend him like you would a teenager caught smoking pot behind the 7/11? How do they know he didn’t have a weapon on him or even worst a bomb strapped to his body? Eliminate the threat, work from their, good job, boys.

Also, Rosie is fat

Also, my grammar was terrible there

Osama bin Laden got all the due process he deserved, though my preference would have 5 years in Guantanamo, , and then release into general population at Attica prison in upstate New York, where there are lots of people from NYC to welcome him.

Hey, she a lib spokesman, so she must be right!

Did Rosie say the Hague?

How many of Rosie’s new fans would be OK with turning bin Ladin over to the Hague for trial?

What about due process for the nearly 3,000 world citizens (not all American) he ordered killed on 9/11?
Rosie, no one is listening to you…STFU!

She’s another of my favorite defenders of left wing idiocy, we don’t see enough of her

Why does anyone give attention – or threads – to this over-hyped, fatuous ignoramus?

Rosie’s kind of dumb to propose we’d turn bin Ladin over to the Hague in any case.

Bin Ladin was wanted by the US for crimes against the US. Why would we turn him over to the Hague?

Republicans have their dim bulbs too, so, you know…

it takes a real gutsy person to look in the mirror and see herself for what she is, and just come right out and spill her guts to the world, although i think monster was an understatement. there really is no description for what rosie is.

NORBIT Jr. said:
Why does anyone give attention – or threads – to this over-hyped, fatuous ignoramus?

fatuous ignoramus, you?

She’s right, we are a nation of armchair monsters, which is nothing to do with the silly lib-con divide this site thrives on. We lost our moral high ground years ago. How many millions of tons of bombs did we drop in Asia, Iraq, Afghanistan? Look at the garbage people go to the movies for: Saw, 100s of movies about serial killers and other sadists, killing machines stars instead of actors, though that is getting passe. The best defense we can muster is that our enemies are even worse. I cringe when I hear barely literate cretins, ones who claim they are Christians and moral, say we must fight and destroy evil Well, baby, we all have some evil in us.

TillieGlockenspiel said:
You are absolutely right! It’s been funny (but sad, actually) to watch them since last Sunday night. They seem to live with a large, dark hole through their middles where the cold wind pours through. Pursued by a thousand forms of fear, the Libs don’t have any standards at all. “Stand for something, or you will fall for anything.”

These kinds of liberals (Modern Liberals/Progressives) live in the moment. They can’t care about the past and they don’t care about the future.

Actually, they care about the past and future to the extent of USING information about it to hurt their enemies.

All of this is why they don’t care about budgets are how their ideas end up hurting people over time.

Look at the inner cities. These liberals have utterly controlled these areas for 50+ years and about all we can say is there is a lot of hopelessness, despair and death. We can also say that the liberals are CONTENT with the damage they have done.

Alz said:
These kinds of liberals (Modern Liberals/Progressives) live in the moment. They can’t care about the past and they don’t care about the future.

Actually, they care about the past and future to the extent of USING information about it to hurt their enemies.

All of this is why they don’t care about budgets are how their ideas end up hurting people over time.

Look at the inner cities. These liberals have utterly controlled these areas for 50+ years and about all we can say is there is a lot of hopelessness, despair and death. We can also say that the liberals are CONTENT with the damage they have done.

Compared to all the idiocy, war and damage right wing creeps like you caused? Take at look at yourself in the mirror, you low brow hypocrite, because a monster is staring back at you. BTW, how did you conclude the liberals are happy with the inner cities? That is a complete lie, but like most of the right wing pigs here, you can’t come up with anything more intelligent or thoughtful than Limbo’s daily load of trash.

Her comments remind me of Animal Farm, or is it her resemblance to Napoleon?

Due process is a right of American’s not her enemies and that is where the left and many Libertarians lose their way. American’s are granted certain inalienable rights including the right to due process; however, it has never, nor should it ever put non-Americans at the same level as those of her nation. The people who promote such policies are the same who support a removal of sovereign rights on the left as well as the movement towards a global form of governance. America must remain a strong nation with its own sovereign lands and rights separate from a world court. If we bend on these issues, we will eventually be as meaningless and impotent as France and England who both for a time Had near unmatched power and prominence.

Sohn Brian said:
Her comments remind me of Animal Farm, or is it her resemblance to Napoleon?

Due process is a right of American’s not her enemies and that is where the left and many Libertarians lose their way. American’s are granted certain inalienable rights including the right to due process; however, it has never, nor should it ever put non-Americans at the same level as those of her nation. The people who promote such policies are the same who support a removal of sovereign rights on the left as well as the movement towards a global form of governance. America must remain a strong nation with its own sovereign lands and rights separate from a world court. If we bend on these issues, we will eventually be as meaningless and impotent as France and England who both for a time Had near unmatched power and prominence.

No your comments are like an animal on the farm would make. Due process has nothing to do with the defendent’s nationality or allegiances. Furthermore, all agents of the US are supposed to abide by those precepts of due process abroad or at home. The decline Britain & France had absolutely nothing to due with due process, more like having Germany destroy their countries and manhood, as well as lost colonies. Honestly, what you and the rest of the srwp call thoughtful or intellectual is almost always meaningless, self justifying rubbish.

Sohn Brian said:
Her comments remind me of Animal Farm, or is it her resemblance to Napoleon?

Due process is a right of American’s not her enemies and that is where the left and many Libertarians lose their way. American’s are granted certain inalienable rights including the right to due process; however, it has never, nor should it ever put non-Americans at the same level as those of her nation. The people who promote such policies are the same who support a removal of sovereign rights on the left as well as the movement towards a global form of governance. America must remain a strong nation with its own sovereign lands and rights separate from a world court. If we bend on these issues, we will eventually be as meaningless and impotent as France and England who both for a time Had near unmatched power and prominence.

You are absolutely correct. “Due Process” was never designed for people who do not subscribe to our system. That’s why we have had military tribunals, etc.

To see this concept outside of the US, look at the Geneva Convention. Only valid soldiers (uniformed, etc.) are granted Geneva protections. For the other people, a country can pretty much do what it wants – usually prison or death.

When confronted with these facts, the goofy liberals all of sudden say that we should be better than the rest. But the reality is giving someone rights that they haven’t earned is terrible, not compassionate. Plus, it just tells their compadres that our system is weak and that they can continue to do nasty things.

Somehow, liberals want to give everyone and everything rights that they do not have.

Quite simply, the liberal approach is wrong, doesn’t make sense, and isn’t supported by history.

If I were a woman, I would love to smack the shit out of Rosie -0′Donnell. If you’re reading this Rosie, not only are you fat and ugly, you’re stupid.

This time direct violent decisive action trumped political correctness.

ROSIE BIATCH-SLAPS OBAMA OVER BIN LADEN RAID!

Ya Gotta Love Those Lefties.

How long before they start calling Barry a RACIST? – LMAO!

thatVeteran said:
This time direct violent decisive action trumped political correctness.

It’s nice to see that you can tell the difference!?!
Due Process = Political Correctness?

The U.S. gave Nazi war criminals due process (complete with defense) at Nuremberg, and no one ever argued that they were American citizens. A case can be made, however, that they killed more innocent people than Bin Laden did.
The Nuremberg war crimes trials were a recognition of human rights, not only of the victims but also those of the criminals.

inaminute said:
The U.S. gave Nazi war criminals due process (complete with defense) at Nuremberg, and no one ever argued that they were American citizens. A case can be made, however, that they killed more innocent people than Bin Laden did.
The Nuremberg war crimes trials were a recognition of human rights, not only of the victims but also those of the criminals.

The difference is the Nazi war criminals were granted *some* due process because they were in a declared war and using the conventional methods of war (uniforms, etc.)

Saboteurs, etc. would not be granted such rights.

Read the Geneva Convention (it’s not long) on who receives Geneva protections. Terrorists clearly would not receive such protections. The concepts in the Geneva Convention mirror the concepts of Western Civilization..

So we’re clear, the equivalence argument isn’t valid.

inaminute said:
The U.S. gave Nazi war criminals due process (complete with defense) at Nuremberg, and no one ever argued that they were American citizens. A case can be made, however, that they killed more innocent people than Bin Laden did.
The Nuremberg war crimes trials were a recognition of human rights, not only of the victims but also those of the criminals.

The Nuremberg trials were conducted AFTER the war. We’re in the MIDST of an ongoing war against AlQueda.. You kill your enemy before they kill you, not ‘try’ them in court. May he rest in hell.

Alz said:
You are absolutely correct. “Due Process” was never designed for people who do not subscribe to our system. That’s why we have had military tribunals, etc. To see this concept outside of the US, look at the Geneva Convention. Only valid soldiers (uniformed, etc.) are granted Geneva protections. For the other people, a country can pretty much do what it wants – usually prison or death.

Depending on any variety of circumstances, the governing law will be our Constitution or the UCMJ or the Geneva Convention treaty.

No matter whether they’re a suspected terrorist (foreign or domestic), or a spy or a saboteur or a soldier or a combatant or a partisan, etc., there is no category of persons who may be tortured under any governing US body of law, even those tried and found guilty.

Mia Kulper said:
Depending on any variety of circumstances, the governing law will be our Constitution or the UCMJ or the Geneva Convention treaty.

No matter whether they’re a suspected terrorist (foreign or domestic), or a spy or a saboteur or a soldier or a combatant or a partisan, etc., there is no category of persons who may be tortured under any governing US body of law, even those tried and found guilty.

And that’s why people talk about defining torture.

Regardless, according to (an attempt to collate) liberal thought on this, squirting water up someone’s nose is supposedly torture, but shotting them is okay.

Alz said:
And that’s why people talk about defining torture.

It may surprise you to know that courageous, knowledgeable and honorable people have ALREADY defined torture and it’s already codified into our laws.

What you’re talking about is RE-defining torture so that we can torture people.

Alz said:
Regardless, according to (an attempt to collate) liberal thought on this, squirting water up someone’s nose is supposedly torture, but shotting them is okay.

In certain circumstance, yes. But when you say that the way you’re saying it, you make it sound stupid and without any logic whatsoever though I’m sure you already know better.

Mia Kulper said:
It may surprise you to know that courageous, knowledgeable and honorable people have ALREADY defined torture and it’s already codified into our laws.

What you’re talking about is RE-defining torture so that we can torture people.

In certain circumstance, yes. But when you say that the way you’re saying it, you make it sound stupid and without any logic whatsoever though I’m sure you already know better.

The reality is given the situation in which many people can be killed and the government has a good idea that someone has information on it, the public will EXPECT the government to do everything possible to stop the attack, etc.

I think were we differ is in trust. When our people are at their best, I trust them to do the right thing. I don’t think liberals trust others so they don’t think it could ever work.

And what is “our best”? It’s WAS when most of the government, especially law enforcement and the military, was filled with good people who were taught good morals and ethics.

As we have moved away from teaching morals and ethics (because the liberals hate the teaching of morals and ethics) , our problems have multiplied.

People don’t trust each other as much and they turn to the courts and bigger government to solve problems.

We become unable to operate as liberals push more and more to the government. The problem is the very same people who were not taught morals and ethics now run the government. …and this is when tyranny increases.

In other words, we SHOULD be able to trust the government to do what is right, but we may not be able to any more. So my support for enhanced interrogation is based on having good people in government.

We have to ask if allowing American’s to be killed is okay vs dealing with a terrorist to stop it.

There is no easy answer, but there is a path. Unfortunately, the liberals keep mining our path!

Alz said:
As we have moved away from teaching morals and ethics (because the liberals hate the teaching of morals and ethics) , our problems have multiplied.

Who are these liberals that are against “teaching morals and ethics?” That’s ridiculous.

Alz said:
We become unable to operate as liberals push more and more to the government. The problem is the very same people who were not taught morals and ethics now run the government. …and this is when tyranny increases.

Whereas the conservatives who push more and more into our government have impeccable ethics, right Pollyanna?

Alz said:
In other words, we SHOULD be able to trust the government to do what is right, but we may not be able to any more. So my support for enhanced interrogation is based on having good people in government.

That’s why you support government torture? Even after you just said we have very bad liberal people with no morals in the government?

Mia, when you stated “whereas the conservatives who push more and more into our government have impeccable ethics, right Pollyanna?” would indicate that you don’t quite understand your politics.

The right has always been noted for wanting less government not more, so your argument does not make sense.

For a second there you forgot which side you were on. lol

All I know is that the jackass that planned the attacks on 9-11 is dead. Do I wish it would have been different?
Yes I do, I wish his death would have been long and painful for him but I guess I can’t have everything. That ugly pig rosie and that fat slob moore can leave America if they feel so bad about what happened to obl! I think the president made the right decision in calling in the Navy Seals and refusing to release any death photos. Thank you Team Six for a job very well done! USA! USA! USA!