Kelly was actually offended by Janet Jackson’s pasty exposure at the Super Bowl and wants all boobs banned from cable? Holy uptight prude. No wonder so many in this country are sexually repressed.

I’ve got an idea. If you don’t like it….turn off the freakin TV. I agree with Stossel on this one.

Thomas J – Libertarian said:
I’ve got an idea. If you don’t like it….turn off the freakin TV. I agree with Stossel on this one.

Wow, you really are a libertarian. Who would have thought it? I thought that handle was just satire.

Thomas J – Libertarian said:
I’ve got an idea. If you don’t like it….turn off the freakin TV. I agree with Stossel on this one.

Indeed. Why do so many conservatives, who hate the government, believe it can’t do anything right, and want it smaller, want the government deciding what people can and can’t watch?

valkyrie101 said:
Wow, you really are a libertarian. Who would have thought it? I thought that handle was just satire.

My other monikers have been removed. I’ve been banned twice…why I don’t know. My former names are “Liberty – Not Redistribution” and “Liberty Banned.” I’ve never written anything comparable to the various partisans on this site. However, one day I pissed Colby off. He has since allowed me to post again.

Personally, I think it’s because I can’t be pigeon hold like the rest of the posters her.

paulmdoro said:
Indeed. Why do so many conservatives, who hate the government, believe it can’t do anything right, and want it smaller, want the government deciding what people can and can’t watch?

I don’t know. I’m not big on the ‘social conservative stuff. I could careless about gay marriage/ polygamy; don’t think the government should deny such systems, just as an example.

Thomas J – Libertarian said:
My other monikers have been removed. I’ve been banned twice…why I don’t know. My former names are “Liberty – Not Redistribution” and “Liberty Banned.” I’ve never written anything comparable to the various partisans on this site. However, one day I pissed Colby off. He has since allowed me to post again. Personally, I think it’s because I can’t be pigeon hold like the rest of the posters her.

Well in any event, for a change you and I are on the same page. :-) There is a natural antagonism between evangelical Christians and true libertarians, like Stossel. Not just on the porn issue.

valkyrie101 said:
There is a natural antagonism between evangelical Christians and true libertarians

Actually, I don’t believe there is any antagonism at all! I am a Christian and I fully agree with Stossel. Individual liberty is paramount in Christianity (man made laws are condoned to protect liberty and in so doing to find our own path). I am sure there are many Christians who don’t agree with me (as there are muslims, jews, etc) but I tend to think they forget that we should not judge someone’s weaknesses (if so perceived)… We all sin which is the entire point of Christ.

Let me caveat, I would never promote porn and never say it is a good thing (my opinion). But every individual must decide for themselves and I would hope that a strong family influence would help youth in such matters… NEVER the gov’t!

Kelley linking sex to big government , hmmmm, sounds like she was doing more than a little winking at Britefart. Maybe she wil start the BRITEFART LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, somebody has to so you RW geezers have somewhere to send your bait and switch gold coins from goldline to support the ongoing hatemongering from britefart and poor old rupert

he latter came about as a result of Kelly’s outrage at “boobgate,” the time about a decade ago when millions of unsuspecting children were exposed to the horror of Janet Jackson’s bejeweled nipple ”

Those were some ugly ass tits!

4Liberty4Justice4All said:
Actually, I don’t believe there is any antagonism at all! I am a Christian and I fully agree with Stossel. Individual liberty is paramount in Christianity (man made laws are condoned to protect liberty and in so doing to find our own path). I am sure there are many Christians who don’t agree with me (as there are muslims, jews, etc) but I tend to think they forget that we should not judge someone’s weaknesses (if so perceived)… We all sin which is the entire point of Christ. Let me caveat, I would never promote porn and never say it is a good thing (my opinion). But every individual must decide for themselves and I would hope that a strong family influence would help youth in such matters… NEVER the gov’t!

Well, for example, having an abortion is considered a woman’s right by libertarians. Would you like the government to rule that abortion is not a right? Many evangelicals do. Prohibiting porn? In fact, as you said, many evangelicals would like to see the government do that. Use of recreational drugs? Sodomy?

I also consider myself a Christian, and I agree with what you said.

notsofast said:
he latter came about as a result of Kelly’s outrage at “boobgate,” the time about a decade ago when millions of unsuspecting children were exposed to the horror of Janet Jackson’s bejeweled nipple ”

Those were some ugly ass tits!

You are right! They looked just like your moms udders!

Averreauxii said:
You are right! They looked just like your moms udders!

No- more like your father’s.

You are obviously the by product of a bestiality experiment gone horrible wrong.

notsofast said:
No- more like your father’s.

You are obviously the by product of a bestiality experiment gone horrible wrong.

You both are wrong — they look like mine!