As usual, Newt Gingrich flagrantly disregards the truth. He’s not running because he knows he can’t withstand serious inquiry into both his personal life and his ridiculous statements.

Shut down the government and impeach the president. Where have I heard that before?

For the truly, truly ignorant amongst us (yes, I mean you lunatic-left d-crat socialists): the president, even the most extremist, radical, anti-American, leftist excuse for one, isn’t the final arbiter on what law is Constitutional. That’s the primary job of the judiciary.

“You Lie!” ‘s failure to enforce DOMA is simply another of his lawless actions, for which the US Constitution sets forth a solution:

IMPEACH “YOU LIE!” HUSSEIN !!!!

Speaker of the House Boehner must convene a special panel to begin IMPEACHMENT hearings for the high crimes and misdemeanors of hussein in relation to the illegal sestak and romanoff job offers, CRONY CAPITALISM with GE, Goldman Sachs, GM and others, blatant extortion of money from a company (BP), intentional failure to protect our borders, willfully ignoring the legal rulings of the courts (that’s the THIRD BRANCH of the federal government, Sen. “Like all lunatic-lefties, I know nothing about the Constitution” Shumer), funneling massive amounts of taxpayer money to unions that then illegally kick-back money to the d-crat socialists, intentional failure to enforce immigration laws and the intimidation of any state or law enforcement agency that does try to enforce them, DOJ acceptance and encouragement of Blank Panther voter intimidation, outrageous race-base law enforcement by the DOJ and his many, many other offenses against America and the US Constitution.

TeaPartyPatriot said:
TeaPartyPatriot says:
February 26, 2011 at 5:42 pm

blah, blah, blah the left sucks…blah, blah, blah the president is a liar…blah, blah, blah…
i don’t mind the insults, it just the lack of any substance and saying the same thing over and over that gets tedious.

if newt was smart and if he is going to run for pres, defending marriage is one of those topics newt my tread a little one.

*a little lightly on.

Cummon, Newt…………stop grandstanding. Hussein could be impeached for many other breaches of the law long before choosing to disregard his duty to enforce DOMA. How about choosing to decline enforcement of our immigration laws, for starters?

Davo said:
Cummon, Newt…………stop grandstanding. Hussein could be impeached for many other breaches of the law long before choosing to disregard his duty to enforce DOMA. How about choosing to decline enforcement of our immigration laws, for starters?

And this Immigration problem? Did it started yesterday or maybe just two years ago?
Once more your bias trumps perspective.

Davo said:
Cummon, Newt…………stop grandstanding. Hussein could be impeached for many other breaches of the law long before choosing to disregard his duty to enforce DOMA. How about choosing to decline enforcement of our immigration laws, for starters?

Psst…did you guys know his middle name is Hussein? Remember Saddam Hussein? He was a Muslim. We’re just organically organized, average, everyday REAL Americans. No racists or bigots. Those are Soros plants. Yup, all of them. Oh I know, there’s a lot, but Soros is rich.

Davo said:
Cummon, Newt…………stop grandstanding. Hussein could be impeached for many other breaches of the law long before choosing to disregard his duty to enforce DOMA. How about choosing to decline enforcement of our immigration laws, for starters?

Davo, you took the words right out, well, you know.

Regardless of the “possible accuracy” of Newt’s comment, saying it out loud was just stupid. Don Imus is right when he says that Newt is absolutely NOT emotionally qualified to be president.

This comment was brought to you by a CCR (Creative Conservative Republican).

A man without a Country said:
And this Immigration problem? Did it started yesterday or maybe just two years ago?
Once more your bias trumps perspective.

Suing a state for enforcing the laws on immigration started with 0bama and his justice lackey, Eric Holder.

Look Look everybody, it’s me Newt, I’m on TV.

Poor Newt. Still trying desperately to matter.

ndanielson said:
Suing a state for enforcing the laws on immigration started with 0bama and his justice lackey, Eric Holder.

Where did that happen? I was under the impression that Arizona created a new law that might possibly be in conflict with federal law, and because of the Supremacy Clause in THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!!!!!!!1, federal law trumps state law, and hence the feds would rightfully challenge it in court to have it determined if it is, in fact, in conflict with federal law.

Oh please let them try to impeach him. I beg them to so that it can blowup in their faces a SECOND time.

Publius219 said:
Where did that happen? I was under the impression that Arizona created a new law that might possibly be in conflict with federal law, and because of the Supremacy Clause in THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!!!!!!!1, federal law trumps state law, and hence the feds would rightfully challenge it in court to have it determined if it is, in fact, in conflict with federal law.

That just shows how inept you are at keeping up on the news, huh? But is ANYONE surprised? Brewer is suing 0bama, now for him not enforcing the federal law on immigration. Are you the new kneepad czar, or is it Bovine pile?

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
Oh please let them try to impeach him. I beg them to so that it can blowup in their faces a SECOND time.

Two consecutive dem presidents impeached? Wow. I think that would be fabulous. A serial adulterer and a constitutional buffoon. That should set the dems back a decade or two. Worthless party of panderers anyway.

Forget the interview of Newt, all I know is the interviewer should be RESTRICTED to radio. My God, nobody told me the 80′s look was back in style.

A man without a Country said:
And this Immigration problem? Did it started yesterday or maybe just two years ago?
Once more your bias trumps perspective.

Nope. But Hussein’s regime DID. As far as I can tell, Hussein is the only President and “Chief Law Enforcement Officer” we have currently.

Arkansas Steve said:
Davo, you took the words right out, well, you know.

Regardless of the “possible accuracy” of Newt’s comment, saying it out loud was just stupid. Don Imus is right when he says that Newt is absolutely NOT emotionally qualified to be president.

This comment was brought to you by a CCR (Creative Conservative Republican).

I couldn’t agree more. Newt is a valuable asset to Conservatism when he stays in his best positions of historian and strategist. His public presence is dismal, but he never seems to notice.

President Biden sounds kinda like a fun time.

Nacho said:
President Biden sounds kinda like a fun time.

It’s looking like that would be a step up from our current president.

ndanielson said:
Two consecutive dem presidents impeached? Wow. I think that would be fabulous. A serial adulterer and a constitutional buffoon. That should set the dems back a decade or two. Worthless party of panderers anyway.

Yes, we saw how well the first one went. God you’re stupid, notsosmart.

Mediaite’s irresponsibility shouldn’t be ignored here either, as they fail to point out the factual inaccuracies in Newt’s statement. And actually make a factually inaccurate statement of their own. Looks like they’re trying out the AOL model before AOL does.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
Yes, we saw how well the first one went. God you’re stupid, notsosmart.

Yes he was impeached, but not removed from office, completely ignorant.

Nacho said:
President Biden sounds kinda like a fun time.

The image of him flipping how Hy Jintao then farting in his cereal would be sure to generate some laughs.

ndanielson said:
Yes he was impeached, but not removed from office, completely ignorant.

Again; we saw how well it went; it was a major loss.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
Yes, we saw how well the first one went. God you’re stupid, notsosmart.

Upon the passage of H. Res. 611, Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228-206 vote)[14] and obstruction of justice (by a 221-212 vote).[15] Two other articles of impeachment failed — a second count of perjury in the Jones case (by a 205-229 vote)[16] and one accusing Clinton of abuse of power (by a 148-285 vote).[17] Four Republicans opposed all four articles, while five Democrats voted for three of them and one Democrat for all four. Clinton thus became the first elected U.S. president and the second U.S. president to be impeached, following Andrew Johnson in 1868 (articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon were passed by the House Judiciary Committee in 1974, but Nixon resigned the Presidency before a vote by the full House).

Bummer, huh, dummy?

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
Again; we saw how well it went; it was a major loss.

Because you will elect any sleazeball and constitutional illiterate to office??? Those days are coming to an end, sweetpea. Your union slush fund is coming to an end, too.

ndanielson said:
Upon the passage of H. Res. 611, Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228-206 vote)[14] and obstruction of justice (by a 221-212 vote).[15] Two other articles of impeachment failed — a second count of perjury in the Jones case (by a 205-229 vote)[16] and one accusing Clinton of abuse of power (by a 148-285 vote).[17] Four Republicans opposed all four articles, while five Democrats voted for three of them and one Democrat for all four. Clinton thus became the first elected U.S. president and the second U.S. president to be impeached, following Andrew Johnson in 1868 (articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon were passed by the House Judiciary Committee in 1974, but Nixon resigned the Presidency before a vote by the full House).

Bummer, huh, dummy?

I didn’t say he wasn’t impeached. I just said it blew up in the Republicans’ faces, which it did. Stop copying and pasting from wikipedia.

ndanielson said:
Because you will elect any sleazeball and constitutional illiterate to office??? Those days are coming to an end, sweetpea. Your union slush fund is coming to an end, too.

Have a nice day, child. you may proceed to argue with the air.

The_Reasonable_Lib said:
I didn’t say he wasn’t impeached. I just said it blew up in the Republicans’ faces, which it did. Stop copying and pasting from wikipedia.

I’ll cut and paste from where ever I want, dummy. Most of you liberal clowns argue that he wasn’t impeached because he sat in office afterward. Well he was, and he sullied the office, but not nearly as much as this buffoon, 0bama is. Those days are coming to an end. The genie is out of the bottle, and your union slush fund is only the beginning of you demise. Thank you 0bama! Did you know that over 680 legislative seats were lost on Nov.2, 2010? To republicans and Tea Party legislators??? I say let the party begin, and tap the kegs in 2012 for the real take down.

GOP had the biggest electoral gains in 70 years.

The President looks like a bumbling fool on foreign policy.

They’re about to defund the Dems Public Union Money Machine.

They’re likely to turn back all of Obama’s socialist legislation – health, finance, stimulus return…

He’s preventing drilling while the nation watches what our oil dependence can lead to.

and of course, the golden goose that, with O’s policies, keeps on giving – The Economy!

The GOP should challenge anyone that wants to impeach him!

Bush should of been impeached for war crimes. The Bush’s administration never went after persons or corporations that violated EPA regulations.

Yoda002 said:
Bush should of been impeached for war crimes. The Bush’s administration never went after persons or corporations that violated EPA regulations.

Take your own president down for war crimes? Wow. That the entire congress approved? Wow. So many fine men and women will jump at the chance to defend this country knowing there are such real Americans like you who would have their back. We should just wait for a nice nuke or EMP next time. What city do you live in? I hope it is your city that draws us into a “real” war.

Ya know, we (Conservatives) might be looking at this all wrong. Maybe we should be GLAD Hussein is assuming the power of the Supreme Court in determining the constitutionality of DOMA. Think of it. The next rational and sane President can use Hussein’s precedent and simply decree ObamaCare unconstitutional, along with the progressive income tax, Dept of Education, the EPA, and Liberalism in general.

Hey…………we might have to honor Hussein as a national hero!

Davo said:
Ya know, we (Conservatives) might be looking at this all wrong. Maybe we should be GLAD Hussein is assuming the power of the Supreme Court in determining the constitutionality of DOMA. Think of it. The next rational and sane President can use Hussein’s precedent and simply decree ObamaCare unconstitutional, along with the progressive income tax, Dept of Education, the EPA, and Liberalism in general.

Hey…………we might have to honor Hussein as a national hero!

That is how clueless they are, only it will be wrong when a conservative picks and chooses which laws to uphold and which to flip you off on. Think filibusters…

Yoda002 said:
Bush should of been impeached for war crimes.The Bush’s administration never went after persons or corporations that violated EPA regulations.

LMAO

Yeah, son, those are big war crimes. And guess what, son? Barry is still prosecuting those wars so dial him up also!

ndanielson said:
Take your own president down for war crimes? Wow. That the entire congress approved? Wow. So many fine men and women will jump at the chance to defend this country knowing there are such real Americans like you who would have their back. We should just wait for a nice nuke or EMP next time. What city do you live in? I hope it is your city that draws us into a “real” war.

When you break Geneva conventions treaties you are a war criminal. Nobody is above the law. I defended this country but I had to follow the Geneva conventions.

Bush was afraid to go to Geneva last month because they would of had him arrested and charged with war crimes.

notsofast said:
LMAO

Yeah, son, those are big war crimes. And guess what, son? Barry is still prosecuting those wars so dial him up also!

I believe he stopped the torture.

Yoda002 said:
When you break Geneva conventions treaties you are a war criminal. Nobody is above the law. I defended this country but I had to follow the Geneva conventions.

Bush was afraid to go to Geneva last month because they would of had him arrested and charged with war crimes.

You should be so proud.

Yoda002 said:
I believe he stopped the torture.

Torture defined by liberals? Water boarding was not a crime until liberals decided it was, but bombing citizens of a sovereign country always has been. Just so you know.

Yoda002 said:
I believe he stopped the torture.

Really? And just how did that happen since Barry still practices rendition?

Over here, it’s me Newt, I’m on TV, I’m relevant, really I am. Look over here”

CosmosDan said:
Over here, it’s me Newt, I’m on TV, I’m relevant, really I am. Look over here”

I think Newt is either batsh!t crazy or stuck in 1953.

CosmosDan said:
Over here, it’s me Newt, I’m on TV, I’m relevant, really I am. Look over here”

man, that wasn’t funny the first 1000 times you posted it.

Get some new material, son.

Hey, remember when the Patriot Act was all the talk? And then Obama extended it… and now, well it worries left a lot less.

Why is that?

ndanielson said:
You should be so proud.

Torture defined by liberals? Water boarding was not a crime until liberals decided it was, but bombing citizens of a sovereign country always has been. Just so you know.

That just show your ignorance. We had prosecuted the Japanese for using waterboarding on U.S. soldiers.

ImNotBlue said:
Hey, remember when the Patriot Act was all the talk? And then Obama extended it… and now, well it worries left a lot less.

Why is that?

Twitter.

Yoda002 said:
We had prosecuted the Japanese for using waterboarding on U.S. soldiers.

That’s before we started to do the same to our soldiers as part of their training.

LOL So you impeached Clinton….how did that work out for ya? How’s that bullet wound in your foot healing? And man, that impeachment just ruined life for Clinton, dontyaknow.

But thanks for wasting 8 million taxpayer dollars on that and an estimated 80 million taxpayer dollars on other probes of Clinton.

In the end, you just made him a superstar.

ImNotBlue said:
Hey, remember when the Patriot Act was all the talk? And then Obama extended it… and now, well it worries left a lot less.

Why is that?

A) Congress extended it. Obama went along with it for political expediency. Peed on your bullets, so to speak.
B) I still think it is a piece of crap legislation. Talk about increasing the size of government, holy crap, what a government bloater. Check out the new building Homeland Security is building. Will rival the Pentagon. Not to mention the loss of privacy the bill brought. Big Brother is watching……you.

BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA HAS CANCELLED WEAPON SALES!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
….to libya.

notsofast said:
man, that wasn’t funny the first 1000 times you posted it.

Get some new material, son.

LOL!!! no really, LOL!!! YOU dissing ANYONE because of old tired lame lines is the BEST JOKE you’ve ever written on this site.

Whew!! That was funnnnnneeeee

@ Weasel

It doesn’t matter “why” he went along with it, only that he did.

And why wasn’t it a priority when the Dems controlled both Houses?

The point is, it was just talk from the left… they hooted and pretended that it was the end of life as we knew it. But when the time came to do something… well, that’s different. Frauds.

ImNotBlue said:
@ Weasel

It doesn’t matter “why” he went along with it, only that he did.

And why wasn’t it a priority when the Dems controlled both Houses?

The point is, it was just talk from the left… they hooted and pretended that it was the end of life as we knew it. But when the time came to do something… well, that’s different. Frauds.

Don’t try talking to Weasel. He’s a liberal that is just bored. You can head over to the Coulter posting to see his repeated rants. The best one was him saying that his crowd doesn’t come out til midnight.

You are far too intelligent on this site to waste your time and effort on trying to understand TW. I give you tons of props for trying though.

Realpolitik . . .

Lee Harvey said:
Poor Newt. Still trying desperately to matter.

Oswald, you are the one that thinks you matter. Put your Italian rifle away.

Wrong. Obama said they would not “defend” DOMA. They would continue to “enforce” it. Two different things. Newt needs to get new glasses and/or hearing aids.

Whether waterboarding should be classified as a method of torture was not widely debated in the United States before it was alleged, in 2004, that members of the CIA had used the technique against certain suspected detained terrorists.[47][48]

Subsequently, the U.S. government released a memorandum written in 2002 by the Office of Legal Counsel that came to the conclusion that waterboarding did not constitute torture and could be used to interrogate subjects. The OLC reasoned that “in order for pain or suffering to rise to the level of torture, the statute requires that it be severe” and that waterboarding did not cause severe pain or suffering either physically or mentally.[49]

For over three years during the George W. Bush administration, the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility conducted an investigation into the propriety of this and other memos by the Justice Department on waterboarding and other “enhanced” interrogation techniques.[50] The OPR report findings were that former Deputy AAG John Yoo committed intentional professional misconduct and that former AAG Jay Bybee committed professional misconduct. These findings were dismissed in a memo from Associate Deputy Attorney General David Margolis who found that Yoo showed “poor judgment” but did not violate ethical standards.[51][52] Commentators have noted that the memos omitted key relevant precedents, including a Texas precedent under then-Governor George W. Bush when the state convicted and sentenced to prison for 10 years a county sheriff for waterboarding a criminal suspect.[53] Bush did not issue a pardon for the sheriff.[53]

Former George W. Bush administration officials Dick Cheney[13][14] and John Ashcroft[15] have stated since leaving office that they do not consider waterboarding to be torture. At least one Republican member of the U.S. Congress, Ted Poe,[16] has taken a similar position.

Bummer, huh, dummy?

Yoda002 said:
That just show your ignorance. We had prosecuted the Japanese for using waterboarding on U.S. soldiers.

I wonder if bombing citizens on sovereign soil with drone strikes is an act of war crimes against humanity??? Or if ignoring the constitution at will is an impeachable offense.

Yoda002 said:
That just show your ignorance. We had prosecuted the Japanese for using waterboarding on U.S. soldiers.

.
The “water boarding” that one Japanese commander was convicted of consisted of placing a weighted board on the stomach of the victim while forcing water down their throats.

And there was also the little matter that that very same Japanese had summarily executed both civilians and POWs and had also deliberately starved both groups.

This morning I heard Charlie Sheen talk about how he has cured himself from his drug addiction, now this guy is talking about who’sallowed to get married.

Not Defend Not Enforce

Where was this guy when Bush and Reagan decided to not defend laws?

Grammie said:
Yoda002 said:
That just show your ignorance. We had prosecuted the Japanese for using waterboarding on U.S. soldiers.
.
The “water boarding” that one Japanese commander was convicted of consisted of placing a weighted board on the stomach of the victim while forcing water down their throats.
And there was also the little matter that that very same Japanese had summarily executed both civilians and POWs and had also deliberately starved both groups.

Janet is absolutely right, Yoda. The kind of waterboarding used during the W and Big Dick reign was good old, American water boarding. All American torture techniques are humane.

There are so many Republicans I would love to see get the nomination in 2012, and Newt is one of them. I suspect he’d run away with Georgia, Alabama and Utah, and that would be fine with me.

YES PUT NEWT ON THE TICKET! LETS SEE ALL THOSE GOOD CHRISTIAN TEAPUBLICANS DEFEND THIS GOOD FAMILY MAN.NEWT IS RIGHT UP THERE WITH THE PIG LIMBAUGH! YOU CAN SMELL THE PIG SHIT ON BOTH OF THEM!

Hey Frances Martel: Perhaps because it’s Saturday, you’ve neglected to update this story. Obama never said anything about not ENFORCING DOMA, but rather that the DOJ will no longer DEFEND DOMA. That’s a crucial distinction. Not enforcing it would theoretically be an impeachable offense, and mostly unprecedented. Not defending it is neither. I’ll just start editing from the comment sections for a nominal fee.

CosmosDan said:
Whew!! That was funnnnnneeeee

Not as funny as your face, son!

Newt. The patron saint of lost causes.

I don’t want him impeached. I want him to drag America further into the ditch just as he’s doing. See ya in ’12.

Obama to Gaddafi: Leave now…come to my house and we’ll sneak you in the back.

Olby Sucks said:
I don’t want him impeached. I want him to drag America further into the ditch just as he’s doing. See ya in ‘12.

Thank you for admitting you hate America, and would rather see our country fail than our President succeed. I have always said that at the heart of the Republican/Conservative is someone who hates our country and the freedoms it represents. You would rather see a Republican president than see people go back to work or for our country to dig itsself out of the ditch.

People like you disgust me, you are actively working to undermine our success as a country, Love it or leave it you POS traitor.

My boyfriend, father and 2 brothers didn’t serve and put on the uniform so people like you could leech off the country and try to bring us down.

Do everyone a favor and find another country to ruin.

Newt Gingrich is disputing the Newsmax story, arguing that it “inaccurately” suggested impeachment.

“Congress has every responsibility to demand President Obama live up to his constitutional obligations, but impeachment is clearly not an appropriate action,” said Gingrich in statement.

Gingrich said that if “President Sarah Palin” took a similar action, the public would question if the president had violated constitutional duties.

“Imagine that Governor Palin had become president,” he said. “Imagine that she had announced that Roe versus Wade in her view was unconstitutional and therefore the United States government would no longer protect anyone’s right to have an abortion because she personally had decided it should be changed. The news media would have gone crazy. The New York Times would have demanded her impeachment.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/50228.html#ixzz1F9zG8Sgi

He was saying had Palin done the same thing, Dems would be calling for her impeachment, but he was calling what Obama did unconstitutional… I think he’s right.

Color Me Badd said:
You would rather see a Republican president than see people go back to work or for our country to dig itsself out of the ditch.

People like you disgust me, you are actively working to undermine our success as a country, Love it or leave it you POS traitor.

My boyfriend, father and 2 brothers didn’t serve and put on the uniform so people like you could leech off the country and try to bring us down.

How interesting………………..ALL Conservative criticisms of Liberal anti-Americans. Did your “thinkers” tell you to spin it like that? Catchy.

If, in case, you actually feel that way, then you have to believe that our founders (very American, wouldn’t you agree?) MEAN’T for us to pervert the Constitution the way Liberals always have in order to substitute Socialism for our liberty, and reduce ourselves from a strong, independent, and productive nation to a country of whining, “victim”hood, and dependency………………..as Liberals ALWAYS have. America was founded as a Right-Wing conspiracy. A single read of the US Constitution proves that it was written as the law-of-the-land for the sole purpose of protecting American FROM Liberalism.

Do everyone a favor and find another country to ruin.

Davo said:
How interesting………………..ALL Conservative criticisms of Liberal anti-Americans. Did your “thinkers” tell you to spin it like that? Catchy.

If, in case, you actually feel that way, then you have to believe that our founders (very American, wouldn’t you agree?) MEAN’T for us to pervert the Constitution the way Liberals always have in order to substitute Socialism for our liberty, and reduce ourselves from a strong, independent, and productive nation to a country of whining, “victim”hood, and dependency………………..as Liberals ALWAYS have. America was founded as a Right-Wing conspiracy. A single read of the US Constitution proves that it was written as the law-of-the-land for the sole purpose of protecting American FROM Liberalism.

Do everyone a favor and find another country to ruin.

Criticism is fine, hoping your country fails because you want your party to control all branches of government is anti-american. Like I said most of the men in my family wore the uniform and many are veterans they didn’t sacrifice so people like you could trash and bring down our country. Patriotism means putting your country before party, too bad you people don’t get that.

notsofast said:
Not as funny as your face, son!

Aw, now you’re back to the same old tired one liners. too bad, I think once your collection is complete you should consider publishing, or has someone already done that and you have the book close to your keyboard?

Color Me Badd said:
Patriotism means putting your country before party, too bad you people don’t get that.

MORE Conservative critique of the anti-American Left who NEVER consider America’s well-being…………only trashing Republicans. You deserve a special obedience reward from your “thinkers.” Did they forbid you to address my post describing the anti-Amer…………OK…………..UN-American practice Liberals have of disregarding the Constitution and weakening American society?

In case you don’t notice, you’re chastising Olby Sucks for identifying YOUR Democrat dreamboat for “dragging America further into the ditch.” He might have worded it poorly, but in attacking his choice of words, YOU are coming off as agreeing with him about Hussein’s damage to America..

Davo said:
MORE Conservative critique of the anti-American Left who NEVER consider America’s well-being…………only trashing Republicans. You deserve a special obedience reward from your “thinkers.” Did they forbid you to address my post describing the anti-Amer…………OK…………..UN-American practice Liberals have of disregarding the Constitution and weakening American society?

In case you don’t notice, you’re chastising Olby Sucks for identifying YOUR Democrat dreamboat for “dragging America further into the ditch.” He might have worded it poorly, but in attacking his choice of words, YOU are coming off as agreeing with him about Hussein’s damage to America..

He worded nothing poorly, he outed himself as anti american is what he did, teabags do this often, they reveal themselves to place party before country, Move to China or North Korea they love Party loyalists there.

FYI Obama sucks.

CosmosDan said:
Look Look everybody, it’s me Newt, I’m on TV.

That’s a good one Dan, but to clarify it was a website and a wacky one at that.

Newt Scozzafava 2012!

Five will get you Twenty “MeBadd” is a Man and his 7 Ft 4in
370 Lb “Boyfriend” can be anything he want to be!
Note:
For amatuer posters reading Internet comment boards!

Whenever you read about Military Service, where served and especially combat stories
Whenever you read about the Education, Great University, advanced degree, etc,
Whenever you read about someone talking about his very successful job, possessions,
riches,
The Super Perfect Kids and Grandkids with the same super success (runs in the family), of course,
I could go on and on, but all of you read these comments from time to time,
Ninty Nine and Nine/tenths of the time that poster is slinging bullshit like shoveling it
out of a stock yard!
These are strangers attempting to impress complete strangers they will NEVER
meet, and quite frankley even if the claims were true, would give a shit!
Just sayin’

Color Me Badd said:
he outed himself as anti american is what he did

Color Me Badd said:
too bad you people don’t get that.

Color Me Badd said:
teabags do this often,

Wow! What’s next? Stoke the Ovens? Dig the mass grave? I think I know what your job in the future is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmii_0HAoPg

Color Me Badd said:
……………teabags do this often, they reveal themselves to place party before country…………..

You keep repeating that nonsense. Is that another homework assignment by your “thinkers?” You DO know what I mean by “thinkers,” right? Liberals never think for yourselves……………you let bloggers and DemoCrit campaigners tell you what to think and say. Then, you obey without question.

Sooooooo……………did your “thinkers” give you any sources for claiming that homosexuals (teabaggers) place party before country? How ’bout Tea Partiers?…………..care to back up your accusations with examples?

Or perhaps your “thinkers” instructed you to simply claim the Conservative agenda to restore America to liberty, self-determination, and productivity and away from the Liberal agenda to convert America to Communism, poverty, and dependence………..as somehow “putting party before country.”

Whew! And you people get offended when Liberalism is identified as a mental disorder? Sheez.

Davo, liberalism is a wonderful example of “group think” isn’t it?

CosmosDan said:
Aw, now you’re back to the same old tired one liners. too bad, I think once your collection is complete you should consider publishing, or has someone already done that and you have the book close to your keyboard?

That’s all you got, homodan?

man, for someone who criticizes others for lack of originality , you sure have nothing; you are just your everyday, typical lib shill, son.

timzank said:
Davo, liberalism is a wonderful example of “group think” isn’t it?

Dunno, Tim. It looks to me more like a small group of emotion tweakers controlling a large group of emotionally-driven but logic-free suckers. “Thinking” doesn’t seem to be part of these dupes’ lives.

Davo said:
Dunno, Tim. It looks to me more like a small group of emotion tweakers controlling a large group of emotionally-driven but logic-free suckers. “Thinking” doesn’t seem to be part of these dupes’ lives.

Good description of the teabaggers.

Publius219 said:
Where did that happen? I was under the impression that Arizona created a new law that might possibly be in conflict with federal law, and because of the Supremacy Clause in THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!!!!!!!1, federal law trumps state law, and hence the feds would rightfully challenge it in court to have it determined if it is, in fact, in conflict with federal law.

Did you forget that, when asked, the Attorney General and the President said they hadn’t actually read the law.

Color Me Badd said:
Good description of the teabaggers.

What’s with your disdain for homosexuals? Is that your admission of having having no examples to back up the accusations your “thinkers” told you to make?

Scroll up 5 posts. I asked questions you apparently can’t think of answers to. Now, don’t go giving yourself a headache trying to come up with any………………… I’m not expecting you to have any thoughts of your own.

Davo said:
Ya know, we (Conservatives) might be looking at this all wrong. Maybe we should be GLAD Hussein is assuming the power of the Supreme Court in determining the constitutionality of DOMA. Think of it. The next rational and sane President can use Hussein’s precedent and simply decree ObamaCare unconstitutional, along with the progressive income tax, Dept of Education, the EPA, and Liberalism in general. Hey…………we might have to honor Hussein as a national hero!

Actually, President Obama is following in the footsteps of the founder of the Democrat Party, President Andrew Jackson. When the Supreme Court decided that forcing the Five Civilized Tribes to leave their land and be forcibly moved to Oklahoma (it was called the Indian Territories then) was Unconstitutional. What President Jackson said is often misquoted as, “Mr. Marshall has made his decision, now let’s see him enforce it.” It may be a shortened version of what President Jackson actually said, but it captures the essence of what he said. I would say the President Obama is not following a good precedent here.

Color Me Badd said:
Thank you for admitting you hate America, and would rather see our country fail than our President succeed. I have always said that at the heart of the Republican/Conservative is someone who hates our country and the freedoms it represents. You would rather see a Republican president than see people go back to work or for our country to dig itsself out of the ditch.
People like you disgust me, you are actively working to undermine our success as a country, Love it or leave it you POS traitor.
My boyfriend, father and 2 brothers didn’t serve and put on the uniform so people like you could leech off the country and try to bring us down.
Do everyone a favor and find another country to ruin.

I have expressed my history on this site, that my father gave the ultimate sacrifice for our country, my father-in-law served during the Vietnam war, he has retired, my brother-in-law also served our country and I also served this country. Currently my beloved serves, he asks nothing in return.

Maybe you should have served also Color Me Badd , you might have learned that dissent , even when not from the left, is the right of everyone in this country .
It’s truly sad ,and makes me ashamed that someone so selfish as yourself only wraps themselves in the flag to score petty political points.
Your family exemplifies the character that helped make this country great . What happened to you ?

With respect, Ft Leavenworth, KS

The Real Royal King said:
Janet is absolutely right, Yoda. The kind of waterboarding used during the W and Big Dick reign was good old, American water boarding. All American torture techniques are humane.

The real racist king once again ignores the facts presented in a post and randomly stings together some words and pretends they make sense.

Michele Ft Leavenworth KS said:
I have expressed my history on this site, that my father gave the ultimate sacrifice for our country, my father-in-law served during the Vietnam war, he has retired, my brother-in-law also served our country and I also served this country. Currently my beloved serves, he asks nothing in return.

Maybe you should have served also Color Me Badd , you might have learned that dissent , even when not from the left, is the right of everyone in this country .
It’s truly sad ,and makes me ashamed that someone so selfish as yourself only wraps themselves in the flag to score petty political points.
Your family exemplifies the character that helped make this country great . What happened to you ?

With respect, Ft Leavenworth, KS

When I referred to the original comment, he said that he hoped things got bad before 2012. I was reacting to the fact that someone would rather see our country fail so their Party could get in power. That is anti-american no matter how you slice it, you choose to defend it so I know how you are.

Dissent is healthy for our country during the Bush adminstration my boyfriend was in Iraq and I protested the illegitimate war, but I never wished for Bush to fail so a Democrat could get elected. I wanted Bush to succeed in Iraq and Afghanistan. So my loved ones could come home in victory.

People in your party seem to want us to fail as a country, I have even heard people say that if we got hit by a terrorist attack that would be good for your side. Disgusting, I can’t even stand to be in the same country with these people. My family made the ultimate sacrifice. If you think I didn’t sacrifice when my boyfriend did 3 tours in Iraq, you are crazy.

“Color Me Badd said:
Thank you for admitting you hate America, and would rather see our country fail than our President succeed.”

You fail to understand, if your President succeeds, the country fails. His policies are bad for the Republic, period. It is incumbent on all Americans to resist the socialist anti constitutional agenda of Teh Organizer.

yesterday it was 2 tours lol

Color Me Badd said:
Disgusting, I can’t even stand to be in the same country with these people.

May I suggest you move your family of bed wetters to Europe where you’ll right in stride with the oh so successful socialists whose policies you so ardently admire?

cjd ohio 1 said:
yesterday it was 2 tours lol

Tomorrow it will be 4 tours and a couple of medals too.

Color Me Badd said:
When I referred to the original comment, he said that he hoped things got bad before 2012. I was reacting to the fact that someone would rather see our country fail so their Party could get in power. That is anti-american no matter how you slice it, you choose to defend it so I know how you are.
Dissent is healthy for our country during the Bush adminstration my boyfriend was in Iraq and I protested the illegitimate war, but I never wished for Bush to fail so a Democrat could get elected. I wanted Bush to succeed in Iraq and Afghanistan. So my loved ones could come home in victory.
People in your party seem to want us to fail as a country, I have even heard people say that if we got hit by a terrorist attack that would be good for your side. Disgusting, I can’t even stand to be in the same country with these people. My family made the ultimate sacrifice. If you think I didn’t sacrifice when my boyfriend did 3 tours in Iraq, you are crazy.

It ‘s a shame that your blind partisanship has so completely shuttered your mind .

Color Me Badd said:
you choose to defend it so I know how you are.

Color Me Badd said:
People in your party

Color Me Badd said:
I can’t even stand to be in the same country with these people.

I see from your families sacrifice you have learned , nothing . Pity .

Col;or Me Badd.

I forgot.

Tell us again was your 7 ft 6 in Companion
who served six tours in Iraq was in the Army or Marine Corpse?

I do thank him for his service!

A very misleading headline, Frances, Gingrich never took the bait. That said, when a president decides to do something like this, he’s no longer presiding over the federal government, but has announced himself dictator. He needs to be punished to no less of an extent than any other person who attempts coup.

Color Me Badd said:
I have even heard people say that if we got hit by a terrorist attack that would be good for your side. Disgusting, I can’t even stand to be in the same country with these people.

OK, CMB, I’ll give up on getting you to support your accusations about Tea Partiers and Homosexuals. Judging by the “thumb score,” your view isn’t gaining much traction.

Perhaps I can help. You might get some support for your “disgust” if you’ll just produce a link to comments you made condemning Rahm Emmanuel’s bragging about “never letting a good crisis go to waste.” Otherwise, you’re just another in a long line of irrelevant hypocrites that are the mainstay of the Democrit Party.

And this, from the guy that personally served his wife for divorce, in her hospital bed after cancer surgery!
What a dirtbag!

Mr.Papshmer said:
A very misleading headline, Frances, Gingrich never took the bait. That said, when a president decides to do something like this, he’s no longer presiding over the federal government, but has announced himself dictator. He needs to be punished to no less of an extent than any other person who attempts coup.

It is an impeachable offense and you are right that he just declared himself dictator. Obama and the DOJ have taken it upon themselves to declare a law unconstitutional. I do believe that is the job of the Supreme Court.

Woofie said:
Newt Gingrich

True but it doesn’t make his assessment of this situation any less true.

Woofie said:
And this, from the guy that personally served his wife for divorce, in her hospital bed after cancer surgery!

Which is relevant in this case because .. ?

Everyone has been watching while those running the show are trying to put on WAGE CONTROLS without putting on price controls, every time the world farts crosswise we attack the working class people. This is like a husband or wife coming home from work mad and kicking the dog. No matter how long you come home and kick the dog, your problems will still be there. The problems we are faced with today were brought on by bad management in all financial institutions and businesses along with the all the people working in the same businesses who should have blown the whistle sooner before all the damage was done form Alan Greenspan, through the stock market, lending instructions, escrows, real estate sales people right down to the people cleaning all of those offices. So after all this crap we are going through to cut the pay checks of every working class person in America. People have to be stupid to accept this climax. When those with money and a big mouth talk about why various government employees are making more than the private sector; HERE IS WHY– Industry through constantly beating down someone, started independent contractors to purposely compete with union help and this put a large segment of the union worker from $ 19.00 per hour down to $11.00 per hour along with the help of illegal-alien carpenters working peace work, competing with hourly wage workers. To them it looked good compared to what they made in Mexico. Any moron knows, no American can compete with slave labor now or in the future, so businesses next step will probably be a civil war but to compound this problem, industry formed a Cartel like the OPEC oil Cartel. Since Webster Dictionary says this is the best way to kill competition and corner the markets for only members of the Cartel. They want competition for working people but kill competition in their businesses. Da., How far will the rich go? They will go until some catastrophe comes and takes all their money and brings them back down to earth. How long should the rest us good American citizens put up with these games of charades Big Business has been playing for about 50 plus years. Big Business is today’s problem. They have the money and the know-how to make paradise in America but to do so they would have to open more business and allow growth to flourish and for some lazy reason they don’t want to do it, they want to suppress our economy so it is easier to control while they live high on the hog with the money they got during this last financial debacle they themselves instigated. Government was instituted to prevent this very thing form happening. If Government gets in bed with industry you know we are going the wrong way. If you are voting for the wrong people using miss-information, you are part of the problem.

There was a time, back in 1995-96, when I was a big fan of Newt Gingrich.

But when he was accused of accepting an excessively large advance on sales of a book, I lost all respect for him when he agreed to pay a fine of $300,000. He should have fought tooth and nail against his accusers, instead of giving them the satisfaction of an undeserved victory.

I do not want him to be my president. I will not support his candidacy for the Republican nomination. There are hundreds of Republicans I would choose before I would settle for Newt Gingrich.

uggugg said:
Everyone has been watching blah, blah, rant, rant ..

Seriously homes, WTF does any of that have to do with Gingrich’s assessment of Obama’s DOMA decision? You’re a moron.

Mr.Papshmer said:
Seriously homes, WTF does any of that have to do with Gingrich’s assessment of Obama’s DOMA decision? You’re a moron.
Start with the fact that the Grinch is setting up a strawman to attack. Obama never said he would not enforce DOMA. He said he would not waste DOJ funds defending the law against challenges to its constitutionality. If the Teabaggers think the law is constitutional, they can pay for the amicus briefs in the Federal Courts. Obama said DOJ would enforce the law as written pending court action.
Hardly impeachable. Doesn’t rise to violating international conventions, signed treaties, federal law and the US Constitution, as the Bush/Cheney regime did.

Joseph Glackin said:

1) Learn how your ‘puter works.

2) You obviously didn’t read the comment I was referring to with my comment, and therefore are without a clue as to what I was talking about.

3) GFY

ndanielson said:
Commentators have noted that the memos omitted key relevant precedents, including a Texas precedent under then-Governor George W. Bush when the state convicted and sentenced to prison for 10 years a county sheriff for waterboarding a criminal suspect.[53] Bush did not issue a pardon for the sheriff.[53]

Do you even read your own citations? The legal precedent is clear. The state of Texas convicted a country sherrif for waterboarding and Bush did not issue a pardon. So, Bush as governor, respected WWII legal precedents when we convicted Japanese soldiers of war crimes for waterboarding.

The argument that no unethical conduct occurred because Margolis rejected the OPR’s recommendations only shows the difficulty of any industry or government agency policing itself with entrenched insiders.

According to a number of sources, Margolis has a history of suppressing any information that would cause embarrassment to the government or the DOJ.

I welcome any real lawyers to discuss the facts surrounding this case.

Papschmear– The headline of the story is, “Obama’s refusal to enforce DOMA may be impeachable offense.” Only a moron (your word) would not understand what I was saying. The Grinch was accusing Obama of something he never said, so that he could talk about impeachment. As for your 3rd point, That seems to be a standard response when you have no other defense.

Joseph Glackin said:
Only a moron (your word) would not understand what I was saying.

You really are slow, aren’t you? This is what you were responding to:

uggugg said:
Everyone has been watching while those running the show are trying to put on WAGE CONTROLS without putting on price controls, every time the world farts crosswise we attack the working class people. This is like a husband or wife coming home from work mad and kicking the dog. No matter how long you come home and kick the dog, your problems will still be there. The problems we are faced with today were brought on by bad management in all financial institutions and businesses along with the all the people working in the same businesses who should have blown the whistle sooner before all the damage was done form Alan Greenspan, through the stock market, lending instructions, escrows, real estate sales people right down to the people cleaning all of those offices. So after all this crap we are going through to cut the pay checks of every working class person in America. People have to be stupid to accept this climax. When those with money and a big mouth talk about why various government employees are making more than the private sector; HERE IS WHY– Industry through constantly beating down someone, started independent contractors to purposely compete with union help and this put a large segment of the union worker from $ 19.00 per hour down to $11.00 per hour along with the help of illegal-alien carpenters working peace work, competing with hourly wage workers. To them it looked good compared to what they made in Mexico. Any moron knows, no American can compete with slave labor now or in the future, so businesses next step will probably be a civil war but to compound this problem, industry formed a Cartel like the OPEC oil Cartel. Since Webster Dictionary says this is the best way to kill competition and corner the markets for only members of the Cartel. They want competition for working people but kill competition in their businesses. Da., How far will the rich go? They will go until some catastrophe comes and takes all their money and brings them back down to earth. How long should the rest us good American citizens put up with these games of charades Big Business has been playing for about 50 plus years. Big Business is today’s problem. They have the money and the know-how to make paradise in America but to do so they would have to open more business and allow growth to flourish and for some lazy reason they don’t want to do it, they want to suppress our economy so it is easier to control while they live high on the hog with the money they got during this last financial debacle they themselves instigated. Government was instituted to prevent this very thing form happening. If Government gets in bed with industry you know we are going the wrong way. If you are voting for the wrong people using miss-information, you are part of the problem.

If it wasn’t your intention to comment on that particular post, then you shouldn’t have quoted my comment.

1) Learn how to use your computer

2) GFY, retard.

Mr.Papshmer said:
Seriously homes, WTF does any of that have to do with Gingrich’s assessment of Obama’s DOMA decision? You’re a moron.

THAT is what I was responding to. Mea Culpa for not reading all of uggugg’s post. I expected you to post the part you were objecting to, along with your diatribe. If nothing else, uggugg got you to post his rant twice.
I stand by what I said about the Grinch and his charges.
I stand by my objection to your insults and sexual preferences. It adds nothing to the discussion, and only shows the immaturity and lack of language skills of the author.

Ahh, Newt! I personally know him well. (His condo is on my floor. I ignore him.) And he is a happy little Nazi!! Always angry. Yah.

I must say, I find it remarkable that he suggests we impeach a man who is in favor of the happiness of others. Whereas Bush started a war that needlessly killed a million people yet that was NOT an impeachable offense! Hey Newt, is that what government is for?

Joseph Glackin said:
THAT is what I was responding to. Mea Culpa for not reading all of uggugg’s post. I expected you to post the part you were objecting to, along with your diatribe. If nothing else, uggugg got you to post his rant twice.
I stand by what I said about the Grinch and his charges.
I stand by my objection to your insults and sexual preferences. It adds nothing to the discussion, and only shows the immaturity and lack of language skills of the author.

Maybe you should get your little brother, you know, the retarded one, to show you how to follow a comment thread.

JJ Vachon said:
I must say, I find it remarkable that he suggests we impeach a man who is in favor of the happiness of others. Whereas Bush started a war that needlessly killed a million people yet that was NOT an impeachable offense! Hey Newt, is that what government is for?

Try watching the clip, moron. Gingrich never suggested impeachment. Frances wrote a dishonest headline, and you fell for it.

Papschmear– For the record, I had a brother five years younger than me who had Down”s Syndrome. He was a thoughtful, caring person who was loved by everyone who knew him. He died in his 20′s of a congenital heart defect that today is reparable. He died before the computer age. If he had lived, I’m sure he would have mastered the usage far beyond my capabilities. I’m also sure he would have been too polite to denigrate the intellect of his correspondents.

Barry is almost certainly an enemy agent, allegiance to the Comintern, a citizen of Indonesia and beholden to alien interests for both illegal campaign contributions and concealing, to the extent they can, evidence of Indonesian citizenship.

Why oh why in the name of all that’s holy does the RINO who currently chairs House Oversight fail and refuse to conduct hearings on impeachment?

Why do not the People press Darrell Issa to institute an exhaustive investigation into Barry’s eligibility and the pay-offs with U.S. treasure to those who concealed his foreign citizenship, fatal to his constitutional eligibility to the Office of President?

Have the People become as apathetic and degenerate as the elite? That would be tragic indeed.

“Newt Gingrich discussed with move with (sic) Newsmax’s Ashley Martella recently and, calling it entirely unconstitutional, suggested impeachment could be a possible remedy to the issue.

No, he didn’t.

notsofast said:
That’s all you got, homodan?

man, for someone who criticizes others for lack of originality , you sure have nothing; you are just your everyday, typical lib shill, son.

Actually it was you who criticized me , just so we’re clear. and that criticism was your funniest most original joke evah!!