Fox Feud Over: Has The White House Retrained Its Sights On Limbaugh?


video

rushDid Rush Limbaugh’s appearance on Fox News Sunday break the alleged “truce” between the White House and Fox News? Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer suggested as much during an interview with Obama’s Senior Adviser, David Axelrod.

After playing a clip of Limbaugh describing of President Obama as “narcissistic,” “immature, inexperienced” and “in over his head,” Schieffer, seemingly referring to Limbaugh’s remarks — or, at least the decision by Fox News to feature Limbaugh on its Sunday interview show. Rather than taking the opportunity to rail on FNC, Axelrod instead spent most of his energy on taking down Limbaugh.

Schieffer said: “Last week your man Robert Gibbs met with the folks at Fox News, declared a truce in this war you’ve been having with them. Was the truce broken this morning? Axelrod replied: “We’re not at war with anyone. We’re at war only with people who represent mistruths…”

Schieffer’s exchanges about Limbaugh, with Axelrod, on the Sunday, November 1 Face the Nation (transcript via Media Research Center:)

SCHIEFFER: Let me ask you this, Mr. Axelrod. Last week when casualties in Afghanistan hit a new high, President Obama went to Dover Air Force base to take part in a ceremony honoring the return of some of those who’ve been killed there. Well, this morning on Fox News Rush Limbaugh had this to say about that.

RUSH LIMBAUGH, ON FOX NEWS SUNDAY: It was a photo-op. It was a photo-op precisely because he’s having big-time trouble on this whole Afghanistan dithering situation. He found one family that would allow photos to be taken. None of the others did. And of course when you have a sycophantic media following you around, able to promote and amplify whatever you want, then he can create the impression that he has all this great concern.

SCHIEFFER TO AXELROD: So what’s your reaction to that?

DAVID AXELROD: My reaction is that I think that the President of the United States went to Dover to represent the American people and pay his respects to the families who had made so much of a sacrifice to those brave service people who made the ultimate sacrifice. It was the appropriate thing to do. And I think most Americans appreciate that.

SCHIEFFER: On this broadcast back in March the White House Chief-of-Staff said this about Rush Limbaugh. He said “he is the voice, the intellectual voice and the energy behind the Republican Party.” Do you believe that what he said today– and we’ll have some more quotes from him here — represents what the Republican Party believes?

AXELROD: I don’t know. That’s for the Republican Party to decide. I think we’ve seen an interesting development over this weekend in a special election up in upstate New York in a congressional district. The Republican candidate withdrew because of the strong third-party movement behind a very right wing conservative. And certainly Mr. Limbaugh and others were behind that. And I think it sends a clear message to moderates within that party that there’s no room at the inn for them and that’s why you see Republican identification in polls at a historic low. So that may be where the energy is in the Republican Party, but it’s certainly not a view on which you can build a majority party.

SCHIEFFER: One of the things he said today was that the President is “narcissistic,” “immature, inexperienced” and “in over his head.” Reaction?

AXELROD: Well, I think it’s a surreal day when you’re getting lectures on humility from Rush Limbaugh. And I’m not going to respond to that. The fact is that he is an entertainer. The President has to run the country. He’s the commander in chief. He has huge responsibilities. I think he does them thoughtfully, he does them well and they’re difficult problems. We walked into a difficult situation. I think he’s handling it very, very well and most people believe that. So, we’ll let Mr. Limbaugh fulminate, but I think the American people are well served and believe they’re well served.

SCHIEFFER: I want to go to other things, but let me ask you one final question. Last week your man Robert Gibbs met with the folks at Fox News, declared a truce in this war you’ve been having with them. Was the truce broken this morning?

AXELROD: Look, I’m not – first of all, let me dispel something. We’re not at war with anyone. We’re at war only with people who represent mistruths as truth and that’s true of any network whether it’s Fox, CBS or any other network. When errors of fact are stated or when opinion is offered as fact, we will challenge that, and that will be our policy going forward and the American people deserve that. We have to do that for the sake of the administration. But we’re not at war with anyone and certainly it’s no surprise that Rush Limbaugh espouses the views that he espouses. He does it every day on radio. He’s marketing the outrageous and he does very well with it. But as I said he’s an entertainer. We’ve got bigger responsibilities and we’re going to discharge those responsibilities.

EmailTwitterFacebookDiggRedditStumble UponYahoo BuzzLinkedInTumblrDelicious


2 comments

  • ChrisNH ChrisNH says:

    There should never have been a ‘truce.’ And if there was one, it should be broken. A ‘truce’ between government and the media means the media is being held in check. For eight years of Bush, the media behaved as they ought to: challenging the President whenever and wherever they see fit. And now there’s supposed to be some ‘truce’ where that’s not allowed to happen? Is there a ‘truce’ between law enforcement and criminals? Should there be? Laughable.

  • Tacoma Chuck Tacoma Chuck says:

    Do you suppose that Wallace would have rejected Obama appearing to have Limbaugh? Axelrod? Biden? Any other big wig Obama administration person?
    Obama’s people have plenty of opportunity to be on FOX programs. It is their choice to not make appearances and concede to the opinions and facts as presented by the other side.
    It is Obama and Company that fear tough questions from FOX.
    They should just stop whining and get themselves a little backbone.

  • If you would like to comment, please login or register:

    » Login » Register

    » Or connect with your Facebook account:

    Bill O’Reilly Defends Fox News News VP Who Gave His Tea Party Opinion

    video

    Bill O'Reilly spent several segments last night discussing the tea party movement and attempting to defend Fox News VP of News and Washington managing editor Bill Sammon for his blanket statement about the mainstream media's 'hatred' of the partying. It included a contentious interview with Politico executive editor Jim VandeHei, a talk with Brit Hume (who previously held Sammon's job) and a "Talking Points" opening (including some 'original reporting').

    Keith Olbermann, Jon Stewart Fail to Eviscerate Sarah Palin

    Hyperbole must be over. How else does one explain the extremely disappointing bits that Jon Stewart and Keith Olbermann did on Sarah Palin last night? Handed (thank you, I'm here all week) 3 days of Palin material that rivaled anything George W. Bush ever gave them, Olbermann could barely manage a molecule of spittle, let alone a lather, and Stewart deployed his seldom-used Nerf™ jokes.



    © 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS