Establishment Republicans Torch Rich Lowry For Claiming Trump’s ‘Unpredictability’ Protected Ukraine From Putin: ‘Dollar Store Revisionism’

Rich Lowry, the editor-in-chief of National Review, whipped up a torrent of anger on Monday night after he argued that Vladimir Putin would not have risked former President Donald Trump’s “unpredictability” by invading Ukraine.
Lowry tweeted, “The sheer unpredictably of Trump, his anger at being defied or disrespected, his willingness to take the occasional big risk (the Soleimani strike), all had to make Putin frightened or wary of him in a way that he simply isn’t of Joe Biden.”
The Atlantic’s Tom Nichols, who is a professor at the U.S. Naval War College, was not impressed. Nichols hit back:
Yes, those were great days, when Putin was frightened by Donald Trump. Terrifying for Russia to have a POTUS who stood there like a whipped puppy and denigrated his own intelligence services, kissed Putin’s ass, and tried to blackmail Ukraine. Amazing Putin lived through it.
Yes, those were great days, when Putin was frightened by Donald Trump. Terrifying for Russia to have a POTUS who stood there like a whipped puppy and denigrated his own intelligence services, kissed Putin’s ass, and tried to blackmail Ukraine. Amazing Putin lived through it. https://t.co/XavJXoB6s8
— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) February 22, 2022
Nichols was not the only one on the right to notice Lowry’s tweet.
Bulwark editor-in-chief Charlie Sykes commented, “Putin frightened of Trump? Bold take there, Rich.” The Bulwark’s publisher Sarah Longwell jested, “‘Lunatics for President! Because who knows what they’ll do with nukes!’ Doesn’t sound like a great foreign policy strategy.”
Putin frightened of Trump?
Bold take there, Rich. https://t.co/AhJeT5YjJY
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) February 22, 2022
“Lunatics for President! Because who knows what they’ll do with nukes!” Doesn’t sound like a great foreign policy strategy. https://t.co/zgjHAgjOSB
— Sarah Longwell (@SarahLongwell25) February 22, 2022
Former Republican strategist Rick Wilson also responded, “This is some Dollar Store revisionism. Trump never once showed any anger, risk-taking or unpredictability with Putin. He showed deference, adoration, admiration, obedience, and sought to wreck NATO, Putin’s highest goals. Putin didn’t need to buy the cow. The milk was free.”
This is some Dollar Store revisionism.
Trump never once showed any anger, risk-taking or unpredictability with Putin.
He showed deference, adoration, admiration, obedience, and sought to wreck NATO, Putin’s highest goals.
Putin didn’t need to buy the cow. The milk was free. https://t.co/KDR3ix6hn2
— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) February 22, 2022
While his co-founder at the Lincoln Project, Steve Schmidt, said, “What Putin saw was strategic incoherence shaped by a vast ignorance of the world. He saw a whore in Trump who would sell out his country; her values and ideals for nothing but flattery. Trump’s conduct was a national embarrassment that was cheered.”
2/ by Trump is lunacy. What Putin saw was strategic incoherence shaped by a vast ignorance of the world. He saw a whore in Trump who would sell out his country; her values and ideals for nothing but flattery. Trump’s conduct was a national embarrassment that was cheered
— Steve Schmidt (@SteveSchmidtSES) February 22, 2022
Below are an assortment of other responses, including some from the left calling out Lowry for once being a leader of the Never-Trump movement:
fun fact: in winter 2016 during GOP primary, Lowry published an *entire Never Trump* issue of National Review bc Trump wasn’t fit to serve as President. https://t.co/oDVNWW2xYd
— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) February 22, 2022
If Putin asked a reelected Trump — no longer surrounded by generals like Mattis and McMaster — to close NATO’s door to Ukraine, you honestly think he wouldn’t have done it? My guess is that Trump would have done it in a heartbeat. Putin loved Trump; wasn’t frightened by him. https://t.co/VGrSqThAxi
— Michael McFaul (@McFaul) February 22, 2022
Frontrunning from the old Never Trump peanut gallery. https://t.co/hh8Q8CG3DI
— Charles P. Pierce (@CharlesPPierce) February 22, 2022
Oh pfft.
The former guy thought Crimea was something that resulted from Mexico not sending us their best. https://t.co/quZUKCPQa4
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) February 22, 2022
Yeah, yeah — Trump’s ineptitude and dangerous self-dealing were actually virtues, particularly when it came to Putin and Russia. Very intellectually rigorous analysis. https://t.co/0wRQ8QFTna
— Tim O’Brien (@TimOBrien) February 22, 2022