»» Columnists

What’s Right With The White House’s Posture on Fox News (And What’s Wrong)


The Wall Between Opinion and News

A linchpin of Fox News’ defense has been the notion that there’s a separation between their news and opinion programming.  This is true, to some degree, but it’s not the same as the separation between, say, ABC News and Dancing with the Stars.  Fox News anchors and reporters routinely appear on these opinion programs, sometimes even offering dissent. Viewers may be able to distinguish between the formats on these shows, but opinion shows like Hannity make offers of fact. Does Fox News Channel feel that opinion programs are devoid of responsibility to present facts fairly and accurately?

For example, host Sean Hannity did several segments in which he presented, as fact, that White House appointee Kevin Jennings “supports” NAMBLA. He deliberately omitted a portion of a Jennings quote that clearly would have shown that this was not true.

If Mediaite ran a headline that said “Sean Hannity Praises Former Member of NAMBLA,” I’m sure Fox News would rightly object, even though that’s exactly what he did. His guest joined NAMBLA to “infiltrate” them. See how that works?

Furthermore, is it fair for Fox News to disavow what its opinion hosts say, after they tried to pin Bill Ayers on Obama? These are two groups of people who work closely together, not long-ago acquaintances.

Media Matters has posted extensive examples of Fox News programming that is untrue or unfair, but the genesis of this fight is clearly driven by Fox News personalities like Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity. Letting them off the hook is a mistake.  They’re entitled to their own opinions, not their own facts.

The White House’s “War on Fox News”

The media seems to be going along with the characterization that this is a White House “War on Fox News,” the implication being that the White House is simply picking on Fox News because they don’t like the coverage. In reality, they are responding to a series of campaigns against the President’s appointees, and a demonstrable slant in their news coverage. Does the fact that the other guy swung first mean that all bets are off? Certainly not, but it’s an important part of the overall picture.

What started out as Fox News whining about being bullied by the White House has morphed into the White House actually bullying Fox News.Bewteen equals, such a scrum might be appropriate, but when you’re the Executive Branch of the United States, you can’t go around telling the other kids to ignore the one you don’t like.

They need to regain the high ground that served them so well during the campaign, and make their case more narrowly. Pushing back against specific stories and identifying patterns of behavior will serve them much better than simply trying to wish Fox out of existence.

The White House hasn’t returned a request for comment on this article.

Pages: 1 2

EmailTwitterFacebookDiggRedditStumble UponYahoo BuzzLinkedInTumblrDelicious


10 comments

  • SFPhoto SFPhoto says:

    Hi Tommy, this is a very well thought out and well written piece. Thank you. Although I have grown to dislike and mistrust Obama, I do think the “White House” does need to regain the high ground. Being a bully has done nothing but drag down Nancy Pelosi and it will do the same for Obama.

  • ImNotBlue ImNotBlue says:

    Media Matters has posted extensive examples of Fox News programming that is untrue or unfair…

    I agree. MOST of what Media Matters posts IS untrue and unfair. I don’t know why people keep referencing them.

  • realitycheck realitycheck says:

    Why would Gibbs have a problem with Garrets Blogs as sources. I seem to recall a certain Huffington Post being ushered into a news conference, and being called upon in prime Time? Does that count as opinionated broadcasting if the White house does a PM Presser? Seems to me someone is cherry picking.

  • straitshooter straitshooter says:

    Mr. Christopher,

    Media Matters fact-checks Fox. Do you fact-check Media Matters? Isn’t it worth mentioning Media Matters’ founders and funders? I would like you, as an employee of the this blog, to do a little heavy-lifting. Go find a Fox News story (news, not commentary) and show us a distortion, or better yet, an out-and-out lie or factual mistake. It’s useless to challenge Fox as an honest news organization without specific proof it has been dishonest.

    Of course if Fox does make mistakes, I expect them to issue corrections and retractions like any other responsible news outfit.

  • CaptainAmerica CaptainAmerica says:

    Why doesn’t Tommy quit writing for Mediaite and go to work for MEDIA MATTERS. He can then tout their b.s. all day and push his gay agenda. Maybe even Kevin Jennings for President!

  • Tommy Christopher Tommy Christopher says:

    The Media Matters material was extremely tertiary to the point I was making, but I did review their examples, which are very well-documented. If you have a problem with one of them, I’ll gladly take a look at it.

  • Tommy Christopher Tommy Christopher says:

    CaptainAmerica,

    anti-gay bias doesn’t just kill gay kids.

    http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=&sc2=news&sc3=&id=90214

  • matt111 matt111 says:

    I get so irritated when people misunderstand the constitution and freedom of speech and press. I see people do it from the left and right, all the time. There is no chilling effect on the freedom of the press. Fox is free to print what they will and the White House is free to attack them in the press or through PR as they will; they have a freedom of speech, as well.

    Now, if the government starts passing laws to outlaw Fox News- that would be different.

    TOMMY CHRISTOPHER, PLEASE BE MORE INTELLIGENT!!!!

  • MoonDog MoonDog says:

    I echo matt111 – you completely missed the one and only point that needed to be made. It’s obvious you are oblivious to that point and frankly, you wasted a lot of time trying to defend and indefensible position.

  • StewartIII StewartIII says:

    NewsBusters: ‘Safe Schools Czar’ Funded Anti-Christian Gay Porn Art Exhibit
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-philbin/2009/10/22/safe-schools-czar-funded-anti-christian-gay-porn-art-exhibit

  • If you would like to comment, please login or register:

    » Login » Register

    » Or connect with your Facebook account:

    AFP’s Tim Phillips Defends Protest Where Sick Man Was Heckled

    video

    After disturbing video emerged earlier this week from an anti-health reform rally where angry protesters screamed in the face of a sitting man who wore a sign identifying that he had Parkinson's disease (and supported the reform bill) MSNBC's Hardball brought on Tim Phillips, head of the grassroots organization Americans For Prosperity, which held the event. While Phillips condemned the actions of those individuals who berated the apparently disabled man, but said that it did not reflect most of his party's "civil" attitude during the Columbus protest.

    Scott Brown On House Health Care Bill: “The Biggest Problem…Is Its Lack Of Transparency”

    video

    Last night when Chris Matthews discussed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's idea of a "Deem and Pass" to get the health reform bill pushed through Congress, his main concern was that it would open up Democrats to criticism of using evasive tactics. And he wasn't wrong: Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown was on The Situation Room tonight, already chomping at the bit to discuss the "backroom deals....political chicanery and parliamentary maneuvers" that the House majority was using to "ram this bill through."



    © 2010 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Newsletter | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | Dan Abrams, Founder | Hosting by Datagram | RSS