Bill O’Reilly: What Bill Clinton And Sen. David Vitter Did Was Worse Than Weiner

video

by Frances Martel | 9:35 pm, June 16th, 2011

» 139 comments

Since the initial rise of Anthony Weiner‘s sexting scandal three weeks ago, the impulse to compare his demise to that of other politicians caught in sex scandals has roped in politicians from all across the political spectrum. Now that he’s gone, some have come to the conclusion that what he did was no worse than what some politicians that stayed in office managed to do. Tonight, Bill O’Reilly proposed just this, comparing Weiner to Sen. David Vitter and President Bill Clinton.

O’Reilly welcomed Fox News commentators Ellis Henican and Jim Pinkerton on the program tonight to evaluate the past three weeks and how precisely they led to Weiner resigning from office. Henican suggested that a large part of his lack of support came form the jack that he was a “jerk” who “treated people awfully” and would “never shut up,” but ultimately is was his “taunting” of the media that did him in. Pinkerton disagreed with the first point entirely, instead suggesting that Democrats loved him but it was the revelation of the many women coming forward that changed the situation. “If Monica Lewinsky had said ‘I confess’ a week before Clinton did,” Pinkerton suggested, he would have had to resign.

O’Reilly returned to the media point, however, and compared Weiner to other surviving politicians, namely Clinton and Sen. Vitter, who was caught patronizing prostitutes in 2007 and was overwhelmingly reelected last year. “On paper,” O’Reilly suggested, “what Vitter did and what Bill Clinton did was worse.” What they did differently, he argued, was that “you can’t taunt the media– once you do that, you’re dead.”

The segment via Fox News below:

Anthony Weiner, Bill Clinton, Bill O'Reilly, David Vitter, Ellis Henican, fox news, Monica Lewinsky, O'Reilly Factor, WeinerGate

http://constitutionallibertarian.co.cc DavidKramer

Vitter, there you go.
http://constitutionallibertarian.co.cc DavidKramer

I acknowledged that Vitter is bad, so you do not have to go there.
What ELSE do you have?
What else does the freak O’Reilly have?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, you can give us O’Reilly as an example. We know,…………….cast the first stones…………
http://TheDividedStatesBlog.com Publius219

Vitter committed multiple felonies. He’s the standard bearer for all of this. Getting a BJ from an intern isn’t illegal. Buying hookers is (although shouldn’t be).
http://constitutionallibertarian.co.cc DavidKramer

You are right, who are we to judge! Specially with someone like O”Reilly! Oh well, let us just look shall we?

Publius219 said:
Vitter committed multiple felonies. He’s the standard bearer for all of this. Getting a BJ from an intern isn’t illegal. Buying hookers is (although shouldn’t be).

Vitter should be castigated.
What else is there?
cjd ohio 1

Publius219 said:
Vitter committed multiple felonies. He’s the standard bearer for all of this. Getting a BJ from an intern isn’t illegal. Buying hookers is (although shouldn’t be).

perjury is
TfT

And what pray tell was it that Clinton did? I laugh that the details of Vitter are identified in this article, but nothing, nada, zip, zilch about all the women and Slick Willey, the lies, the threats, and the perjury. Funny stuff.
http://constitutionallibertarian.co.cc DavidKramer

Problem is, we the PEOPLE do not stand for them.
We the People stand for 8-20% for them.

OH WELL!

Maybe we the people are sick and tired of them!
Colorado_Conservative

Frances, a little exaggeration in the headline don’t ya think?
Thelonious Funk

All of these scandals prove my theory: People like sex.
GuessWhoSuka

Well….hehehehehehehehe…
Now that he’s gone we can go to the “look at those democrats throwing their own under the bus” phase eh?
hehehehehe….. wouhuhuhuoouuu…hahahahahaha…..well done conservatives….well done.
insideguy

Well as I have said before Bill O is one of the most consistent of the righties at least he brought up the comparison. Most on the right will not. Credit to Bill.
Bill Huggins

YEP YEP

PAPA BEAR WITH THE TRUTH BOMB
GuessWhoSuka

Bill Huggins said:
YEP YEP

PAPA BEAR WITH THE TRUTH BOMB

hahahahahahaha……wouhouhouhouhouhouhou!!!!!!!!!!!!

PAPA BEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GOD KNOWS I ALWAYS LOOK TO BILL’O FOR THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!
WOUHOUHOUOUHOUHOUHOU!!!!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But hey…this time he was right…hehe
A.R.

vitter is bad
weiner COULD be worse IF he was sexting under age girls…this isn’t italy…we dont accept pedophilia
cjd ohio 1

cjd ohio 1 said:
perjury is

well at least 3 people think perjury is not a crime
A.R.

A.R. said:
vitter is bad
weiner COULD be worse IF he was sexting under age girls…this isn’t italy…we dont accept pedophilia

mind you…i bet among the hookers vitter used…there was probably 1 who was under age…
JR

Bill’s issue was perjury and embarrassing the crap out of the country. Vitter is just a slimeball and needs to get gone and Weiner’s biggest issue was that you keep your private life private, you don’t lie your butt off to the press, and no one really needs nor wants to see your junk.

In comparison? Probably Bill because a sitting POTUS shouldn’nt commit perjury and make a mockery of our justice system, but Vitter if the POTUS position wasn’t involved.

If only politicians could keep it in their pants until their term was over. That would engender the gratitude of a nation. Just so sick of the frat boy behavior.
abowen

wow finally someone recognize the kind of senator that Louisiana has a adulteration, lying bigot, good for his talking head of O’Really
abowen

AR your are an idiot
brownsound

DavidKramer said:
I acknowledged that Vitter is bad, so you do not have to go there.
What ELSE do you have?
What else does the freak O’Reilly have?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, you can give us O’Reilly as an example. We know,…………….cast the first stones…………

Bill conveniently left out the fact that Weiner (and the lib media) attempted to smear Breitbart as the “hacker” and Weiner was all too happy to allow the smear to continue.
seek

Publius219 said:
Vitter committed multiple felonies. He’s the standard bearer for all of this. Getting a BJ from an intern isn’t illegal. Buying hookers is (although shouldn’t be).

he did? Please, shed some light on exactly which deeds you construe as felonious behaviour.
THE REAL ROYAL KING

Don’t you know Vitter is angry and frustrated. He thought all of this was behind him. With Clinton, there were consequences. With Weiner, there were consequences. With Vitter there was one slightly embarrassing press conference. No consequences. Instead, his Republican colleagues in the Senate embraced him, and they continue to do so. The big story, the enduring story in L’Affaire Weiner may end up being L’Affaire Vitter. To be sure, his Republican colleagues are going to do all they can to let him go unscathed, and they will no doubt be successful. And, in so doing they lay themselves naked before us all as frauds and hypocrites. Who would have thought, we’re all taken back to the dirty diaper-clad Republican Senator in a New Orleans cat house? It is something of a miracle, isn’t it?
cjd ohio 1

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Don’t you know Vitter is angry and frustrated. He thought all of this was behind him. With Clinton, there were consequences. With Weiner, there were consequences. With Vitter there was one slightly embarrassing press conference. No consequences. Instead, his Republican colleagues in the Senate embraced him, and they continue to do so. The big story, the enduring story in L’Affaire Weiner may end up being L’Affaire Vitter. To be sure, his Republican colleagues are going to do all they can to let him go unscathed, and they will no doubt be successful. And, in so doing they lay themselves naked before us all as frauds and hypocrites. Who would have thought, we’re all taken back to the dirty diaper-clad Republican Senator in a New Orleans cat house? It is something of a miracle, isn’t it?

well you did quote the joke of the day……….democrats are held to a higher standard……..lol
A.R.

abowen said:
AR your are an idiot

huh? were you one of the hookers who had to sleep with vitter for money? sucks to be you
THE REAL ROYAL KING

cjd ohio 1 said:
THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Don’t you know Vitter is angry and frustrated. He thought all of this was behind him. With Clinton, there were consequences. With Weiner, there were consequences. With Vitter there was one slightly embarrassing press conference. No consequences. Instead, his Republican colleagues in the Senate embraced him, and they continue to do so. The big story, the enduring story in L’Affaire Weiner may end up being L’Affaire Vitter. To be sure, his Republican colleagues are going to do all they can to let him go unscathed, and they will no doubt be successful. And, in so doing they lay themselves naked before us all as frauds and hypocrites. Who would have thought, we’re all taken back to the dirty diaper-clad Republican Senator in a New Orleans cat house? It is something of a miracle, isn’t it?
well you did quote the joke of the day……….democrats are held to a higher standard……..lol

So, I take it you have no substantive objection to what I wrote?
Skippy

If Billdo knew the first thing about operating computers, we would have HIM in pictures, not only on court transcripts.
cjd ohio 1

clinton, what consequences….none stayed in office, the rest is just your opinion and hyperbole
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
If Billdo knew the first thing about operating computers, we would have HIM in pictures, not only on court transcripts.

court transcripts really, where?
Skippy

cjd ohio 1 said:
court transcripts really, where?

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/lawrence-o%E2%80%99donnell-warns-o%E2%80%99reilly-to-avoid-weinergate-by-waving-04-sex-scandal-affidavit/

Where do you think those came from? Thin air?
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/lawrence-o%E2%80%99donnell-warns-o%E2%80%99reilly-to-avoid-weinergate-by-waving-04-sex-scandal-affidavit/ Where do you think those came from? Thin air?

thats a affidavit, or sworn statement, but you said court transcript,
Skippy

cjd ohio 1 said:
thats a affidavit, or sworn statement, but you said court transcript,

Have you seen the documents?

Where do you think someone files a lawsuit?

IN COURT, you idiot!
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
Have you seen the documents? Where do you think someone files a lawsuit? IN COURT, you idiot!

lol that is not a court transcript, my lord was that prepared by a court reporter of the proceedings
http://www.facebook.com/people/Kevin-Cusick/1215594294 Kevin Cusick

How did Rep. Anthony Weiner come to his decision to resign from the House. Check out “A Day in the Life of Anthony Weiner” on The Loop Now.com, where we pretended to follow him around for a full day.
theloopnow.com/?p=8260
Skippy

cjd ohio 1 said:
lol that is not a court transcript, my lord was that prepared by a court reporter of the proceedings

NO “my friend”

It is a COURT document.

You are confusing TESTIMONY – Billdo’s- against what Andrea Mackris was TESTIFYING. Here

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7578-2004Oct28.html

Fox believed Mackris had tape recordings of the long, highly detailed conversations alleged in the suit, but Morelli never confirmed that, saying only that they had concrete evidence. O’Reilly and his attorney, Ronald Green, never denied that the Fox commentator had used such language, but said he never broke the law and questioned whether Mackris was truly offended or was taking words and phrases out of context.

Questions swirled around Mackris’s conduct as well, including why she didn’t hang up on O’Reilly, why she never complained to Fox authorities and why she returned to work for him earlier this year after spending a few months at CNN. “I was put in a position with a man that, whenever he would call me at work or at home, work-related, he would say jump and I’d say how high and I would jump,” Mackris told CNN earlier this month. “I’m not used to saying no to this man on any level. I had said no to him and no to him and no to him and no to him and no to him and no to him about his saucy language. . . . He had threatened that anybody who ever would speak of it would be raked through the mud. . . . I was absolutely threatened.”
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
NO “my friend” It is a COURT document. You are confusing TESTIMONY – Billdo’s- against what Andrea Mackris was TESTIFYING. Here http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7578-2004Oct28.html Fox believed Mackris had tape recordings of the long, highly detailed conversations alleged in the suit, but Morelli never confirmed that, saying only that they had concrete evidence. O’Reilly and his attorney, Ronald Green, never denied that the Fox commentator had used such language, but said he never broke the law and questioned whether Mackris was truly offended or was taking words and phrases out of context. Questions swirled around Mackris’s conduct as well, including why she didn’t hang up on O’Reilly, why she never complained to Fox authorities and why she returned to work for him earlier this year after spending a few months at CNN. “I was put in a position with a man that, whenever he would call me at work or at home, work-related, he would say jump and I’d say how high and I would jump,” Mackris told CNN earlier this month. “I’m not used to saying no to this man on any level. I had said no to him and no to him and no to him and no to him and no to him and no to him about his saucy language. . . . He had threatened that anybody who ever would speak of it would be raked through the mud. . . . I was absolutely threatened.”

exactly a sworn statement that her lawyer wrote of the complaints she had against bill o……that is not a court transcript…….its called filing a lawsuit…….no proof, just her word
Skippy

cjd ohio 1 said:
exactly a sworn statement that her lawyer wrote of the complaints she had against bill o……that is not a court transcript…….its called filing a lawsuit…….no proof, just her word

And because there was no “proof” Billdo payed millions. Makes sense.

Where do you file a lawsuit, again?
GuessWhoSuka

cjd ohio 1 said:
lol that is not a court transcript, my lord was that prepared by a court reporter of the proceedings

hahahahahha…..wohuouhuhuhouhuhuhuhuh……
If you wanna see some “court transcripts” of O’Reilly you won’t….cause O’reilly always settles outside the court!!!!!
hehehehehe…..but you can still see a LOT of legal documents and maybe court transcripts on the smokingun.com…including that sexual harassment case where he settled for 10 millions but the tapes still got out anyway….hhahahahahhahahahaha…..wouohouhouohouohouohouohouohouoh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Here’s a youtube link for a summary of the case..and the man….hahaha….hehehehehe…wouohouohouohou!!!

you’re welcome….hahahahhahahahahha!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*drink*

wooooouuuuuhhhoooouuuuuuuhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!
Skippy

O’Reilly to Mackris: “Just use your vibrator to blow off steam.” When the plaintiff reddened, O’Reilly asked lewdly, “What, you’ve got a vibrator don’t you? Every girl does.” When the Plaintiff responded indignantly, “No, they don’t. Does your wife?” O’Reilly replied, “Yes, in fact she does. She’d kill me if she knew I was telling you.”
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
And because there was no “proof” Billdo payed millions. Makes sense. Where do you file a lawsuit, again?

clerk of courts
GuessWhoSuka

hahahahhahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Forgot the youtube link!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hahahahahhahahahahahahha…..wouhouhouhouhohu!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABwrV4nZCNk

Enjoy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*drink*
cjd ohio 1

GuessWhoSuka said:
hahahahahha…..wohuouhuhuhouhuhuhuhuh……If you wanna see some “court transcripts” of O’Reilly you won’t….cause O’reilly always settles outside the court!!!!!hehehehehe…..but you can still see a LOT of legal documents and maybe court transcripts on the smokingun.com…including that sexual harassment case where he settled for 10 millions but the tapes still got out anyway….hhahahahahhahahahaha…..wouohouhouohouohouohouohouohouoh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Here’s a youtube link for a summary of the case..and the man….hahaha….hehehehehe…wouohouohouohou!!! you’re welcome….hahahahhahahahahha!!!!!!!!!!!!! *drink* wooooouuuuuhhhoooouuuuuuuhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!

never said his was guilty or not, but when someone has court transcripts , hell i want to see
Skippy

“O’Reilly informed Mackris that he advised another woman to purchase a vibrator, and had taught that woman how to masturbate while telling her sexual stories over the telephone.”
Skippy

“The Defendant suggested that Mackris purchase a vibrator. When the Plaintiff became embarrassed and told him she was not interested, O’Reilly again suggested: we should do it together. I could coach you through it.”
cjd ohio 1

cjd ohio 1 said:
thats a affidavit, or sworn statement, but you said court transcript,

do you know the difference between a court document and a court transcript? skippy
GuessWhoSuka

cjd ohio 1 said:
never said his was guilty or not, but when someone has court transcripts , hell i want to see

smokinggun.com

:)

*drink*
Skippy

“If any woman ever breathed a word I’ll make her pay so dearly that she’ll wish she’d never been born. I’ll take her through the mud, bring up things in her life and make her so miserable that she’ll be destroyed. And besides, she wouldn’t be able to afford the lawyers I can, or endure it financially as long as I can. And nobody would believe her. It’d be her word against mine, and who are they going to believe – me or some unstable woman making outrageous accusations? They’d see her as some psycho; someone unstable. Besides, I’d never make the mistake of picking unstable crazy girls like that.”
Skippy

“If you cross Fox News Channel, it’s not just me; it’s Fox President Roger Ailes who will go after you. I’m the street guy out front making loud noises about the issues, but Ailes operates behind the scenes, strategizes and makes things happen so that one day BAM! The person gets what’s coming to them but never sees it coming. Look at Al Franken. One day he’s going to get a knock on his door and life as he’s known it will change forever. That day will happen; trust me.”
Skippy

“During the course of this conversation, Defendant Bill O’Reilly bizarrely rambled further about Al Franken: “Ailes knows very powerful people and this goes all the way to the top.” The Plaintiff queried: “To the top of what?” The Defendant responded: “Top of the country. Just look at who’s on the cover of his book [Bush and Cheney]. They’re watching him and will be for years. [Al Franken’s] finished, and he’s going to be very sorry he ever took the Fox News Channel on.”
cjd ohio 1

GuessWhoSuka said:
smokinggun.com :) *drink*

i see her complaint , yes………….but the court transcripts are what happened when it went to court, do you have them, skippy says he does
cjd ohio 1

cjd ohio 1 said:
do you know the difference between a court document and a court transcript? skippy

just say no skippy and move on
GuessWhoSuka

cjd ohio 1 said:
never said his was guilty or not, but when someone has court transcripts , hell i want to see

hey I can’t find it right now…but the girl who filed the complaint actually taped the conversation that led to the lawsuit…heheheh…like after months of that BS she got fed up and just taped him…..lolllllll!!!!!!!

HILARIOUS NO?????

hahahaha…anyway that’s why the case never went to court and Papa Bear settled for 10 biggies instead

I can’t find the actual link right now but it’s out there somewhere….and I guarantee you it’s some absolutely hilarious stuff..!!!!!
Google or youtube…whatever it’s easy to find and so fun to listen to…you got my word on that

hehehehehhehehehe…………………
Skippy

cjd ohio 1 said:
do you know the difference between a court document and a court transcript? skippy

Apparently you don’t know BOTH come from the courthouse.
cjd ohio 1

GuessWhoSuka said:
hey I can’t find it right now…but the girl who filed the complaint actually taped the conversation that led to the lawsuit…heheheh…like after months of that BS she got fed up and just taped him…..lolllllll!!!!!!! HILARIOUS NO????? hahahaha…anyway that’s why the case never went to court and Papa Bear settled for 10 biggies instead I can’t find the actual link right now but it’s out there somewhere….and I guarantee you it’s some absolutely hilarious stuff..!!!!!Google or youtube…whatever it’s easy to find and so fun to listen to…you got my word on that hehehehehhehehehe…………………

if it never went to court, how can there be a court transcript?
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
Apparently you don’t know BOTH come from the courthouse.

lol, keep digging
GuessWhoSuka

cjd ohio 1 said:
if it never went to court, how can there be a court transcript?

lol…..can’t be a court transcript if it didn’t go to court….?????
the document you saw is the legal complaint filed to the court but there is no court transcript because O’Reilly settled for 10 millions to avoid going to court.
but you can still find the tape of the conversation that led to the lawsuit online

:)
Skippy

cjd ohio 1 said:
lol, keep digging

October 13, 2004
New York State Supreme Court
by Andrea Mackris
cjd ohio 1

GuessWhoSuka said:
lol…..can’t be a court transcript if it didn’t go to court….?????the document you saw is the legal complaint filed to the court but there is no court transcript because O’Reilly settled for 10 millions to avoid going to court.but you can still find the tape of the conversation that led to the lawsuit online :)

so skippy is saying he has the court transcript, and you are saying there is not one because it was settled out of court………wow….all bases are covered
cjd ohio 1

GuessWhoSuka said:
lol…..can’t be a court transcript if it didn’t go to court….?????the document you saw is the legal complaint filed to the court but there is no court transcript because O’Reilly settled for 10 millions to avoid going to court.but you can still find the tape of the conversation that led to the lawsuit online :)

and i believe you, and that they settled, but skippy still has the court transcripts of a cases that didnt go to court
cjd ohio 1

skippy…….you found that court transcript yet? lol
Skippy

Two different things, because it is a matter of semantics.

The case didn’t go to TRIAL.

The lawsuit was filed in the courthouse. The lawsuit was settled “out of court” which means IT DID NOT GO TO TRIAL.

You don’t know this?
Skippy

cjd ohio 1 said:
skippy…….you found that court transcript yet? lol

Where do you think I got those quotes from?

What do you think Lawrence O’Donell was waving around?
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
Two different things, because it is a matter of semantics. The case didn’t go to TRIAL. The lawsuit was filed in the courthouse. The lawsuit was settled “out of court” which means IT DID NOT GO TO TRIAL. You don’t know this?

no court transcripts like you claimed, damn, what a disappointment
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
Where do you think I got those quotes from? What do you think Lawrence O’Donell was waving around?

a complaint filed by the lady in a form called a affadavit
Skippy

“So anyway I’d be rubbing your big bo obs and getting your nipples really hard, kinda’ kissing your neck from behind … and then I would take the other hand with the falafel (sic) thing and I’d put it on your pussy but you‘d have to do it really light, just kind of a tease business …”
Cecelia

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
substantive

That’s a “consequence of the substantive void”, I guess…
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
“So anyway I’d be rubbing your big bo obs and getting your nipples really hard, kinda’ kissing your neck from behind … and then I would take the other hand with the falafel (sic) thing and I’d put it on your pussy but you‘d have to do it really light, just kind of a tease business …”

when you finish the sworn statement, you can start reading the court transcripts, let me know
Skippy

cjd ohio 1 said:
a complaint filed by the lady in a form called a affadavit

Where was it filed, again?

Why was Billdo afraid the documents, explicit, with dates, would be released?

And because they were “just allegations” Billdo threw millions at the lawsuit. Right?
Skippy

“You would basically be in the shower and then I would come in and I’d join you and you would have your back to me and I would take that little loofa thing and kinda’ soap up your back … rub it all over you, get you to relax, hot water … and um … you know, you’d feel the tension drain out of you and uh you still would be with your back to me then I would kinda’ put my arm – it’s one of those mitts, those loofa mitts you know, so I got my hands in it … and I would put it around front, kinda’ rub your tummy a little bit with it, and then with my other hand I would start to massage your bo obs, get your nipples really hard … ‘cuz I like that and you have really spectacular bo obs …
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
Where was it filed, again? Why was Billdo afraid the documents, explicit, with dates, would be released? And because they were “just allegations” Billdo threw millions at the lawsuit. Right?

then produce the court transcript
cjd ohio 1

the court transcript is a record of court prceedings word for word that occured during a given trial
Skippy

cjd ohio 1 said:
then produce the court transcript

No. You do your own damned work.

I have been posting from 24 pages of Billdo’s garbage, but you still don’t believe where Billdo FILED his own counter lawsuit.

Clue:

New York State Supreme Court
GuessWhoSuka

hahahahahahahah………..

well…there is no “court transcript” as you put it so very well so….you won!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wwwooooohuohuhouhohuhohuhohuuuuuuuuuu!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PAPA BEAR IS A SAINT!!!!!!!

WOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*drink*
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
No. You do your own damned work. I have been posting from 24 pages of Billdo’s garbage, but you still don’t believe where Billdo FILED his own counter lawsuit. Clue: New York State Supreme Court

you just dont understand what a court transcript is. but i know you wont admit your mistake but it was fun anyway, to have a court transcript there has to be a trial….duh
Skippy

cjd ohio 1 said:
the court transcript is a record of court prceedings word for word that occured during a given trial

You reaaaally don’t know what the F you are talking about.

You are talking about TRIAL, as if anything outside the courtroom, the courthouse don’t matter. But those other documents are still court transcripts. But you don’t know that.
cjd ohio 1

GuessWhoSuka said:
hahahahahahahah……….. well…there is no “court transcript” as you put it so very well so….you won!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wwwooooohuohuhouhohuhohuhohuuuuuuuuuu!!!!!!!!!!!!! CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PAPA BEAR IS A SAINT!!!!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *drink*

its not that, i just hate when people embellish stuff to make it look stronger
GuessWhoSuka

PAPA BEAR!!!!
PAP BEAR!!!!
PAPA BEAR!!!!
WWWOOOOHHHHOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
BILLO DIDN’T GO TO TRIAL SO HE MUST BE INNOCENT RIGHT?????6
WWWWWOOOOOHHHHHHHOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
WHO PAYS 10 MILLION WHEN THEY’RE GUILTY TO AVOID TRIAL????????
HOHOHOHOHOHEHEHEHEHEHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

*drink*
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
You reaaaally don’t know what the F you are talking about. You are talking about TRIAL, as if anything outside the courtroom, the courthouse don’t matter. But those other documents are still court transcripts. But you don’t know that.

wikipedia……….transcript (law) look it up
Skippy

RON GREEN, ATTORNEY FOR FOX NEWS & BILL O’REILLY: No, he does not. In fact, what Bill O’Reilly has stated directly and through me, his counsel, is that not only has he never engaged in any form of unlawful sexual harassment at any level, but he will not comment specifically on the words or sentences or phrases that are contained in the complaint against him, which seem to be part of larger conversations until we can see those conversations in full and in context.

We want Mr. Morelli to produce the tapes that we believe may exist that his allegations imply do exist by how they are set forth… and frankly, to either fish or cut bait.
cjd ohio 1

GuessWhoSuka said:
PAPA BEAR!!!!PAP BEAR!!!!PAPA BEAR!!!!WWWOOOOHHHHOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!BILLO DIDN’T GO TO TRIAL SO HE MUST BE INNOCENT RIGHT?????6WWWWWOOOOOHHHHHHHOOOOOO!!!!!!!!WHO PAYS 10 MILLION WHEN THEY’RE GUILTY TO AVOID TRIAL????????HOHOHOHOHOHEHEHEHEHEHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! *drink*

no he is a douche and a dog………but that was not the point for skippy
Skippy

“This is my fault. I was stupid and I’m not a victim. But I can’t allow certain things to happen and I appreciate your support. We get thousands of letters, but I’m not—I am stupid. I am a stupid guy and every guy listening knows how that is. That we are very stupid at times.”
GuessWhoSuka

cjd ohio 1 said:
no he is a douche and a dog………but that was not the point for skippy

ok
cjd ohio 1

GuessWhoSuka said:
ok

you tell him guess, please, court documents and court transcripts are two different things
Skippy

GREEN: Well, I think what he was saying was that he was stupid to allow himself to be placed in a position of vulnerability where someone could think they should shake him down and extort money from him. Remember what we have here is a $60 million threat that appeared in a draft complaint that was shown to Fox attorneys before any complaint was filed in this action and then a demand from which Andrea Mackris’ counsel never retreated of $60 million, offering no proof of injury.

Frankly, Dan, a late breaking development today was that we sent a notice to take the deposition of Andrea Mackris in her suit filed after our extortion lawsuit and a notice to have her examined by a physician in support of her claims that she was emotionally damaged. We received a letter just today from Mr. Morelli on behalf of his client, Andrea Mackris, that he has not placed at issue in her lawsuit any claim concerning her emotional state. Since she’s not claimed physical injury, she’s still on the payroll, has suffered no economic harm, that betrays his notion that this is anything but a claim of extortion.
GuessWhoSuka

cjd ohio 1 said:
you tell him guess, please, court documents and court transcripts are two different things

yes they are..that’s correct…. but you’re dodging his point on a technicality and you know it
Skippy

GREEN: I can’t tell you that he never uttered the words or sentences or phrases that appear in the claim that she’s made. What I can tell you is that until we can see the source of those alleged remarks, notes, transcripts or tapes, we can’t put those things in context if they were said…
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
You reaaaally don’t know what the F you are talking about. You are talking about TRIAL, as if anything outside the courtroom, the courthouse don’t matter. But those other documents are still court transcripts. But you don’t know that.

ron white is right…………..you cant fix stupid
cjd ohio 1

GuessWhoSuka said:
yes they are..that’s correct…. but you’re dodging his point on a technicality and you know it

no i am not, go back and read, he said larry odonnell has the court transcripts, i know oreilly settled out of court, which means he did something sneaky, this is just he wont admit it is a sworn statement and not a transcript
cjd ohio 1

cjd ohio 1 said:
no i am not, go back and read, he said larry odonnell has the court transcripts, i know oreilly settled out of court, which means he did something sneaky, this is just he wont admit it is a sworn statement and not a transcript

court transcript
GuessWhoSuka

Skippy said:
GREEN: I can’t tell you that he never uttered the words or sentences or phrases that appear in the claim that she’s made. What I can tell you is that until we can see the source of those alleged remarks, notes, transcripts or tapes, we can’t put those things in context if they were said…

cjd ohio 1 said:
ron white is right…………..you cant fix stupid

you’re both being childish
we all agree that Bill is a pervert who shouldn’t be commenting on that subject ,being a pred himself

so that’s that
let’s all get along

*drink*
cjd ohio 1

Skippy said:
If Billdo knew the first thing about operating computers, we would have HIM in pictures, not only on court transcripts.

cjd ohio 1 said:
court transcripts really, where?

Skippy said:
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/lawrence-o%E2%80%99donnell-warns-o%E2%80%99reilly-to-avoid-weinergate-by-waving-04-sex-scandal-affidavit/ Where do you think those came from? Thin air?

cjd ohio 1 said:
thats a affidavit, or sworn statement, but you said court transcript,

Skippy said:
Have you seen the documents? Where do you think someone files a lawsuit? IN COURT, you idiot!
cjd ohio 1

GuessWhoSuka said:
you’re both being childishwe all agree that Bill is a pervert who shouldn’t be commenting on that subject ,being a pred himself so that’s thatlet’s all get along *drink*

agreed drink
Skippy

GREEN: No, I’m not. What I’m saying is as the appellate division in this state has said on the level of professional responsibility, by way of example, if there is gross disproportionality between any demand for settlement and any conceivable injury, that is prima facia evidence of a breach of professional responsibility. And the difference also exists under our state penal law.

Even if allegations are true, and we do not for a moment conceive that they are in this case, you can use the truth as an unlawful weapon. For example, suppose someone has a photograph of an on-air celebrity taken when they were young and foolish that if published today would be grossly embarrassing but the photograph is a true depiction of an event. And whoever has the photograph says to that personality, I have not been injured, I own the photograph. But I’m going to release it to the public for the expressed purpose of causing you humiliation unless you pay me an extraordinary sum of money.

======================================================

Which was my original point.

If Billdo had known a dammed thing about using computers, we would have HIS pictures instead of just court transcripts.
Jaurez

BJ is the King O Sleaze to be sure.
GuessWhoSuka

cjd ohio 1 said:
no i am not, go back and read, he said larry odonnell has the court transcripts, i know oreilly settled out of court, which means he did something sneaky, this is just he wont admit it is a sworn statement and not a transcript

and cjd……let’s call them “legal documents” then ok?
why can’t we have fun bashing on BILLO the stalker instead ?
Jaurez

Patsy, you went to which law school?
skyfet

Yeah! this is what I’ve been saying. I don’t see the right wing family value folks outrage on that, but rather than throw him out, they sent him back to Washington.
Jaurez

GuessWhoSuka said:
and cjd……let’s call them “legal documents” then ok?
why can’t we have fun bashing on BILLO the stalker instead ?

Thanks for your concern.
Jaurez

GuessWhoSuka says:

sock alert
cjd ohio 1

GuessWhoSuka said:
and cjd……let’s call them “legal documents” then ok?why can’t we have fun bashing on BILLO the stalker instead ?

hey i know it was petty, but i dont like being called a idiot by this fool skippy, you all have a good night now
seek

Skippy said:
GREEN: No, I’m not. What I’m saying is as the appellate division in this state has said on the level of professional responsibility, by way of example, if there is gross disproportionality between any demand for settlement and any conceivable injury, that is prima facia evidence of a breach of professional responsibility. And the difference also exists under our state penal law.

Even if allegations are true, and we do not for a moment conceive that they are in this case, you can use the truth as an unlawful weapon. For example, suppose someone has a photograph of an on-air celebrity taken when they were young and foolish that if published today would be grossly embarrassing but the photograph is a true depiction of an event. And whoever has the photograph says to that personality, I have not been injured, I own the photograph. But I’m going to release it to the public for the expressed purpose of causing you humiliation unless you pay me an extraordinary sum of money.

======================================================

Which was my original point.

If Billdo had known a dammed thing about using computers, we would have HIS pictures instead of just court transcripts.

How can you have “court transcripts” when it never went to court? Hellooooooo
GuessWhoSuka

Jaurez said:
Thanks for your concern.

hahahahahahhahahahahahahhaha….wwwwoooooohhhhoooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

…….I sense some unaware of the conversation vindication here…..
sup with that man?you lookin for something?
cause I gotta say…you can’t win an empty argument with me dude…I’m way to crazy…..
so either make a real point or just don’t even bother buddy…….

hehehehehehehehehhe

*drink*
seek

GuessWhoSuka said:
hahahahahahhahahahahahahhaha….wwwwoooooohhhhoooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

…….I sense some unaware of the conversation vindication here…..
sup with that man?you lookin for something?
cause I gotta say…you can’t win an empty argument with me dude…I’m way to crazy…..
so either make a real point or just don’t even bother buddy…….

hehehehehehehehehhe

*drink*

I guessed – now will you evaporate?
Skippy

Jaurez said:
Patsy, you went to which law school?

Why, Jeffy? You need a lawyer?

I don’t think I know anyone willing to defend what you do to the horsies, Jeff.

Well, maybe Marky.
GuessWhoSuka

cjd ohio 1 said:
hey i know it was petty, but i dont like being called a idiot by this fool skippy, you all have a good night now

allright…good night then…take care.
m_mayhem

Skippy…don’t waste your time with these fools. Anybody with half a brain can see your point and that your right.
Just like Palin and the Paul Revere thing cjd ohio will never admit to being wrong…wingnutz never do. cjd ohio is probably over at wikipedia trying to change the definition of court document between posts.
Jaurez

GuessWhoSuka says:

I got under your skin so deep you’re copying me, now and you had to change names, again. LOL!
Skippy

seek said:
How can you have “court transcripts” when it never went to court? Hellooooooo

That was Billdo’s attorney.

“not going to TRIAL” does not mean it was NOT FILED in court.
Jaurez

4 minutes to change names? LOL!
Skippy

m_mayhem said:
Skippy…don’t waste your time with these fools. Anybody with half a brain can see your point and that your right.
Just like Palin and the Paul Revere thing cjd ohio will never admit to being wrong…wingnutz never do. cjd ohio is probably over at wikipedia trying to change the definition of court document between posts.

It just for the fun of rubbing these idiots in their own filth.
Jaurez

Patsy said:
That was Billdo’s attorney.

“not going to TRIAL” does not mean it was NOT FILED in court.

You wentr to which law school? LOL!
GuessWhoSuka

seek said:
I guessed – now will you evaporate?

really?
I know I’m new around here but really?
You just come in and ask me to evaporate?
Do you have any idea how not funny that is?
I’m sure you can do a lot better than that …..

hhehehehehheeheeee….wwwwoooooohhhhooooooo!!!!!!!

*drink*

Please now….wait before you know me for at least 2 min before you get into the lame bashing…I’m sure you got a brain in there somewhere no?
posterchild

Making Bill O’Really sound like the adult in the room is risky business on this right-wing site.
Stop messing with the deep thinkers and liberal-tormentors of Mediaite,
It’s confusing and upsetting.
Jaurez

Wow, the socks are flyin, now.
Skippy

Jaurez said:
You wentr to which law school? LOL!

Sorry, Jeffy.

I am NOT taking your case.

I am not interested in hearing about your exploits with barn animals.

Go somewhere else!
Jaurez

Sockpuppet said:
Sorry, Jeffy.

I am NOT taking your case.

I am not interested in hearing about your exploits with barn animals.

Go somewhere else!

N ice rebuttal…wait, you had none.
Jaurez

The darling of the progressives got caught posting his dik pics on the internet…and quit! ROFFLMBAO!!!!!!!!!
Skippy

Jaurez said:
N ice rebuttal…wait, you had none.

You want to see pictures, Jeffy?

You and the horse you are trying to marry?

You bore me, Jeffy.

Bye!
Jaurez

GuessWhoSuka says:
posterchild says:
Skippy says:

same loser
Jaurez

By, Philby!
GuessWhoSuka

Jaurez said:
You wentr to which law school? LOL!

Dude if you ask that question in that particular instance you’re shooting yourself in the foot…
just letting you know………….
probably best to shut up if you don’t know what you’re talking about dude
Just4thefax

Fact: He had a moment of trying to bury the hatchet on his Talking Points memo. I would rather him stay the course of attacking him like he did the rest of the week.
Steve_27

I think Bill O is right about the basics here. What Clinton and Vitter did was worse but they didn’t go nuts with the media like Weiner did and thats why he’s gone. Everything i’m seeing and hearing indicates that he could have kept his job if not for his actions after he got busted.
kawboom

Sen. Vitter should resign because he is more perverted than WEINER! :-P
Steve_27

kawboom said:
Sen. Vitter should resign because he is more perverted than WEINER! :-P

Nah nah nah nah nah, whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!

OMG, what? 8 years old? 9? 10?
writer

Well, it’s about time someone mentioned Vitter. No one has been doing it.
donalan

And where does your sexual harassment of a direct subordinate rank BiLL-O? I mean fair and balanced should disclose your own picadillos right? No – you are an opportunist Bill.
Rio

writer said:
Well, it’s about time someone mentioned Vitter. No one has been doing it.

I wonder if this will eventually be known as the Rep. Anthony Vitter Weiner scandal?
writer

The bitter Vitter Weiner misdemeanor.
BatBoy

The difference is he did not lie and deceive his leadership, the public & the press.

Poor Weiner thought he could control the message, but couldn’t!

Does anyone know who Weiners reported $5,000,000 election war chest can be spent?
Rio

writer said:
The bitter Vitter Weiner misdemeanor.

Anthony Weiner the Newt

or Newt the Anthony Weiner?
Steve_27

donalan said:
And where does your sexual harassment of a direct subordinate rank BiLL-O? I mean fair and balanced should disclose your own picadillos right? No – you are an opportunist Bill.

It doesn’t rank at all, idiot.

“Disclose?” We already know.
“Opportunist?” No, he has a show and he covers this stuff.
Weiner? Politician representing the people.
O’Rielly? Talk show host that people turn on or turn off.

You are an extreme childlike baby and a babble fool donalan. Grow the f— up!
Steve_27

writer said:
Well, it’s about time someone mentioned Vitter. No one has been doing it.

LOL! Now thats appropriate sarcasm.
StewartIII

ChickaBOOMer: Weiners Will ‘Bounce Back’
http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2011/06/weiners-will-bounce-back.html
Bill Huggins

writer said:
Well, it’s about time someone mentioned Vitter. No one has been doing it.

What is the statute of limitations to forgetting about this?

The lawbreaker is STILL IN OFFICE

We can call him out on being PROSTITUTE LOVER AND DISEASE CARRIER asing as he’s protected by the other Cons

Just because you’re tired of hearing about it means that what he did was OK?

TYPICAL CON HYPOCRISY

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
CAconservative

We are in the midst of a mortgage meltdown unparalleled in this country’s history brought on by the direct, and indirect culpability of persons serving in Congress resulting in the loss of tens of Billions of dollars, and endless heartache for thousands of citizens, and yet, all it takes is a seamy, sex scandal to get rid of a political-beggar? The Press, Congress, and the public at large have jumped on this issue as though it has more weight than being scammed, and shafted by persons in Congress who just pissed on the publics trust! What the hell is going on here? What the hell’s wrong with you people?!!!!!!!!!!!!
timcajun

BatBoy says:
The difference is he did not lie and deceive his leadership, the public & the press.
………………………………………….
He just broke the law and lied to his wife, with his family values and deceived the the public from the oath he took!
Lord you guys are hypocrite clowns. Stop while you’re ahead, Weiner ruined himself, take joy in that and move on!
tatboy

Publius219 said:
Vitter committed multiple felonies. He’s the standard bearer for all of this. Getting a BJ from an intern isn’t illegal. Buying hookers is (although shouldn’t be).

Lying under oath IS. I remember recently the left thought that was a big deal…. is that not the case anymore?
tatboy

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Don’t you know Vitter is angry and frustrated. He thought all of this was behind him. With Clinton, there were consequences. With Weiner, there were consequences. With Vitter there was one slightly embarrassing press conference. No consequences. Instead, his Republican colleagues in the Senate embraced him, and they continue to do so. The big story, the enduring story in L’Affaire Weiner may end up being L’Affaire Vitter. To be sure, his Republican colleagues are going to do all they can to let him go unscathed, and they will no doubt be successful. And, in so doing they lay themselves naked before us all as frauds and hypocrites. Who would have thought, we’re all taken back to the dirty diaper-clad Republican Senator in a New Orleans cat house? It is something of a miracle, isn’t it?

What was the name of the Democrate that was convicted of statitory rape in the late 80′s? I t is a weird story in that it was under-age female staffers he was sexing up and it was revieled later he was gay. Guess it’s the same as a strait man molesting boys. But anyway… we was welcomed back by the dems with a standing ovation.

Beat THAT!!!
timcajun

tatboy says:
What was the name of the Democrate that was convicted of statitory rape in the late 80’s? I t is a weird story in that it was under-age female staffers he was sexing up and it was revieled later he was gay. Guess it’s the same as a strait man molesting boys. But anyway… we was welcomed back by the dems with a standing ovation.

Beat THAT!!!
……………………..
Beat that!!!…ok…Didn’t happen! That’s called “tea bubble spin” or lies. If convicted, how could you come back to office? A little more fact, a lot less spin and hate!