If this is indeed true, Sue Walton is a disgrace and should be ashamed of herself. She has no place in any political organization doing crap like that. As if Democrats didn’t have enough of a bad rap already, she just adds it on.

soooo tolerant

When are people going to learn that democrats only exploit and use gays and minorities, to get elected.

The only thing worth noting in this story is the word kerfuffle. It is wholly underused in the world.

Kerfuffle. What a wonderful word.

Just another example of Democrat dirty tricks.

They have many bags full of them.

The problem with Breitbart is the fact that he has used video editing techniques to slander people, its hard for me to give this video any credibility. While this video seems authentic, it would be relatively easy for him ask a leading question to get a response he wishes and edit the rest of the video.

I heard that Ron Howard has threatened to sue her and that Vince Vaughn is willing to let it go.

Obama , Podesta and Soros should denounce their fellow Democrat official !

Once again we see which party is the party of Hate and Hate Speech.

Don’t you pepole just want to SHOWER every time you tell someone you’re a Democrat?

LOL!!

So for the record, King doesn’t have a problem with a Dem using the word Gay as an insult IF it’s aimed at a Conservative.

Seeing November From My Window said:
So for the record, King doesn’t have a problem with a Dem using the word Gay as an insult IF it’s aimed at a Conservative.

Just an FYI… that ain’t Robert (RRK). Note the spelling of “Knig”.

Interesting. The party of kumbaya.

I’d be curious to hear some past statements from this representative of the left on things like, um, gay rights and gays in society, gays in the military, gay marriage, etc.

Just wondering what the views of one who thinks that shouting, “he’s gay” is the most insulting thing to say to a guy, that’s all.

Tatboy says:

Just an FYI… that ain’t Robert (RRK). Note the spelling of “Knig”.

Haha, normally I notice that. I guess I looked too quickly.

Seeing November From My Window said:

Just an FYI… that ain’t Robert (RRK). Note the spelling of “Knig”.

And the presumed pronunciation of “Knig” could be perceived by some as an intentional racist slur.

I’m just sayin’…

espo222 said:
When are people going to learn that democrats only exploit and use gays and minorities, to get elected.

Exactly. You would think that the NOW group would be going berserk over how Muslims treat women. Likewise, you would think that the gay groups would be going berserk over how Muslims treat gays. (Don’t the Iranians hang gays?)

But both groups are silent.

They are silent because the deep-down Modern Liberals/Progressives control these groups and use the groups as fronts.

marcus.lewis said:
The problem with Breitbart is the fact that he has used video editing techniques to slander people, its hard for me to give this video any credibility. While this video seems authentic, it would be relatively easy for him ask a leading question to get a response he wishes and edit the rest of the video.

If you mean that Sherrod issue (where Sherrod was caught talking in racist language), Breitbard did not edit the video, it was an EXCERPT. Big difference.

This is funny!

marcus.lewis said:
The problem with Breitbart is the fact that he has used video editing techniques to slander people, its hard for me to give this video any credibility. While this video seems authentic, it would be relatively easy for him ask a leading question to get a response he wishes and edit the rest of the video.

I assume you don’t watch television too often. Campaign ads from both sides use edited videos and sound bites to lie about their opponents. Cables news is also guilty of doing the same thing.

Expand your horizons, Grasshopper.

It is a well established fact that Sue Walton is a notorious fag hag in IL Dem circles, you can see her at Roscoe’s in Chicago pretty often and I am pretty sure her gaydar is pretty keen. Notice Breitbart didn’t deny it, he is cute for sure.

Alz said:
Breitbard did not edit the video, it was an EXCERPT. Big difference.

This response is almost as funny as Sue letting the cat out of the bag, almost.

Jonathan Scott said:
It is a well established fact that Sue Walton is a notorious fag hag in IL Dem circles, you can see her at Roscoe’s in Chicago pretty often and I am pretty sure her gaydar is pretty keen. Notice Breitbart didn’t deny it, he is cute for sure.

So as a gay man, what is your opinion of what Ms. Walton did?

If you want to find outrageous signs and embarrassing comments at any conservative gathering, just look for the Democrats who are on hand. That’s one of the reasons why Glenn Beck asked participants at his recent rally to leave all signs at home. The leftwing is so determined to link their opponents to embarrassments of this sort that they have been forced to create the very signs and incidents they later report on. When you take away these contrived signs, the leftwing media are left dumbfounded — because they no longer had a “safe” angle to use in reporting on the event. And you KNOW that they never report on what is said from the podium — because if they talked about those pleas for government accountability and fiscal responsibility, most of their readers would be in agreement. And they would NEVER want that to happen. But even without signs, you get people like Sue Walton, a Democrat party official operating as an agitator at a conservative event. A sad spectacle, to be sure, but very much part of the Democrat playbook these days.

Alz said:
If you mean that Sherrod issue (where Sherrod was caught talking in racist language), Breitbard did not edit the video, it was an EXCERPT. Big difference.

You’re talking semantics now. In order to excerpt something, you need to edit a video. While yes, your larger point is that he did not doctor the video is true–nonetheless he took something out of context in order to make an ideological point.

VRWC Destruction Machine said:
I assume you don’t watch television too often. Campaign ads from both sides use edited videos and sound bites to lie about their opponents. Cables news is also guilty of doing the same thing.

Expand your horizons, Grasshopper.

Cable news is shit. So are campaign ads, that’s why I don’t rely on them. Perfect example is the ad Alan Grayson ran intending to make his opponent seem as if he is “pro subservient women”. It’s all a joke.

Ohhhhh, first the DOJ sues to keep DODT stayed, and now a Democratic ‘plant’ does some gay-bashing on behalf of the party.

Tsk, tsk…now that can’t be good for next Tuesday!

LMAO!!!!

Azarkhan said:
So as a gay man, what is your opinion of what Ms. Walton did?

Notice the timing of Breitbart’s new beard and grizzly Adams look. I don’t think it is by chance that one of the biggest Bear Camps in the country is having it’s big get together next weekend. Do you?

felixw said:
If you want to find outrageous signs and embarrassing comments at any conservative gathering, just look for the Democrats who are on hand. That’s one of the reasons why Glenn Beck asked participants at his recent rally to leave all signs at home. The leftwing is so determined to link their opponents to embarrassments of this sort that they have been forced to create the very signs and incidents they later report on. When you take away these contrived signs, the leftwing media are left dumbfounded — because they no longer had a “safe” angle to use in reporting on the event. And you KNOW that they never report on what is said from the podium — because if they talked about those pleas for government accountability and fiscal responsibility, most of their readers would be in agreement. And they would NEVER want that to happen. But even without signs, you get people like Sue Walton, a Democrat party official operating as an agitator at a conservative event. A sad spectacle, to be sure, but very much part of the Democrat playbook these days.

Wow, I didnt see that coming, so you are basically admitting that Sue Walton is a plant? Wow thanks, I dont even think you meant to say that but thanks anyway.

Jonathan Scott said:
one of the biggest Bear Camps

What is a Bear Camp?

Demoncrat says, “I think he’s gay!” = pull out the fainting couch!

Republican Congressional staffer writes “All fa**ots must die” = collective yawn

TruthLovinFreedomLover said:
Republican Congressional staffer writes “All fa**ots must die” = collective yawn

I don’t think he is yawning now–he was fired.

Democrats hate gays and blacks. They just use them as a weapon.

marcus.lewis said:
You’re talking semantics now. In order to excerpt something, you need to edit a video. While yes, your larger point is that he did not doctor the video is true–nonetheless he took something out of context in order to make an ideological point.

Cable news is shit. So are campaign ads, that’s why I don’t rely on them. Perfect example is the ad Alan Grayson ran intending to make his opponent seem as if he is “pro subservient women”. It’s all a joke.

The whole video was available and Breitbart’s excerpt was pretty “big.” Editing is quite different.

disenlightened said:
Democrats hate gays and blacks. They just use them as a weapon.

Quite so! Republicans love teh gays as long as they don’t marry or adopt or teach or….

I’m curious, Jonathan Scott…..

So, what if he IS gay? Shouldn’t he be welcomed under the Big Umbrella of the left? You know, all for one, and so on?

If a conservative shouted anything similar he or she would be pilloried on the alter of political correctness. It would be headlines, the centerfold of every liberal talking point.

You people are the biggest hypocrites in history.

Harry Flashman said:
I’m curious, Jonathan Scott…..

So, what if he IS gay? Shouldn’t he be welcomed under the Big Umbrella of the left? You know, all for one, and so on?

If a conservative shouted anything similar he or she would be pilloried on the alter of political correctness. It would be headlines, the centerfold of every liberal talking point.

You people are the biggest hypocrites in history.

I saw Sue Walton doing jello shots with Aaron Shrock at Big Chicks last weekend they were having a great time dishing. Luv u.

Azarkhan said:
I don’t think he is yawning now–he was fired.

Has your boyfriend found work yet?

Jonathan Scott said:

your music sucks

Let’s see, Sue Walton is damn ugly and has no children . . . must be a Democrat.

Hammer_You said:
your music sucks

Apparently so does Andrew Breitbart and Aaron Shrock.

I see her intent going two ways. Less likely, she could be using ‘gay’ as a negative term, which would be despicable. More likely, she is likening to the stereotypical gay closeted republican, which is just as despicable. All around, pretty despicable.

marcus.lewis said:
You’re talking semantics now. In order to excerpt something, you need to edit a video. While yes, your larger point is that he did not doctor the video is true–nonetheless he took something out of context in order to make an ideological point.

Breitbart posted what he was sent. He didn’t cut the excerpts. And when he got the entire video, he posted a correction to the facts that were wrong in his original post. What else would you like from him?

Jonathan Scott said:
Apparently so does Andrew Breitbart and Aaron Shrock.

their sucking isnt going to make your shitty music any better

First it was the race baiting, and now its gay bashing. I think the Democratic party is tearing apart at the seems…

Hammer_You said:
their sucking isnt going to make your shitty music any better

No it certainly won’t but I know a lot of Larry Craig, Ed Schrock and Mark Foley types that would pay good money for an Andrew Breitbart Aaron Shrock, Bear does twink video.

Hey she coulda stomped his head though!

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/10/26/2010-10-26_woman_stomped_on_outside_of_tea_party_favorite_rand_paul_democrat_jack_conway_de.html

I know surprise right?

Jonathan Scott said:
Notice the timing of Breitbart’s new beard and grizzly Adams look. I don’t think it is by chance that one of the biggest Bear Camps in the country is having it’s big get together next weekend. Do you?

I think he’s gay to; what’s the point. I have no problem with him being gay – he just comes across that way and should probably come out.

The difference is – because we know Republican’ts are sheep – WE’RE NOT denying homosexuals rights that all citizens of the US should enjoy. YOU ARE!!!

So, by my thinking Andrew is GAY – does not make me a hypocrit – for I don’t care what he does with his partner(s) sexually; what he does in creating hate and fear mongering and intentional deceit as funded by the Koch Bros./Rupert Murdoch, et. al. does. He represents the hate and fear mongering party of GOP intellectually challenged and appeals to those in our society that are bigots, racists, homophobes and religiously indoctrinated to do the Corporate Citizen’s bidding.