1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough

Revealed: Obama Thought Palin’s ‘Death Panels’ Too ‘Absurd’ To Address

» 5 comments

President Obama and the media is getting The New Yorker treatment this week. Obama is about to celebrate his first year as President. And boy has it been a year. That intensity that has surrounded his first year, while partly the result of events that followed Obama to the Oval Office, is also the result of media coverage that only increased after his inauguration.

In this week’s issue Ken Auletta takes a look at the relationship between Obama and the press (a relationship that has perhaps been subjected to more scrutiny in the last two years than even that of Brangelina) but also explores how the sea change that the media industry itself has undergone (enter Twitter, etc.) combined with the nation’s fascination with Obama may have resulted in a different sort of leadership from Obama. Saya Auletta:

“The news cycle is getting shorter—to the point that there is no pause, only the constancy of the Web and the endless argument of cable. This creates pressure to entertain or perish, which has fed the press’s dominant bias: not pro-liberal or pro-conservative but pro-conflict.”

Auletta talks to all the big wigs for the piece: Chuck Todd, Jake Tapper, David Axelrod, Peter Baker, Anita Dunn, Rahm Emanuel, etc. Alas, the article itself is behind a paywall, but here are a few highlights. This remark from David Axelrod who was a political journalist himself before becoming and adviser feels particularly apt (for all media not just the political sphere):

“There are some really good journalists there, really superb ones. But the volume of material they have to produce just doesn’t leave a whole lot of time for reflection.”

That is putting it mildly. NBC’s Chuck Todd notes “we’re all wire-service reporters now” (also known as ‘the Twitter effect’). There’s also this nugget regarding Mike Allen of Politico, who more than anyone has picked up where Mark Halperin left off at The Note, and is be driving this newly accelerated news cycle.

While most newspapers have drastically curtailed their travel budgets, there has been a Politico reporter on nearly every one of Obama’s domestic and overseas trips. Mike Allen, Politico’s chief White House correspondent, has become one of Washington’s most influential journalists. By seven each morning, Allen, a former correspondent for the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Time, posts ‘Playbook,’ his account of what he thinks the major news stories of the day will be. … To insure that the White House gets a shot at featuring its version of what’s important, officials e-mail and telephone Allen starting at 5 A.M.

Including apparently Dick Cheney. Interestingly, there’s also an admission that one of the reason’s Sarah Palin’s ‘death panel” remark was able to take hold is that the White House thought it too idiotic to deal with. One imagines they won’t be making that same mistake going forward.

When Sarah Palin claimed that the Democratic health-care bill would institute “death panels” to determine who received care, “we thought it was absurd,” [Dan] Pfeiffer says, “and there was a perhaps naïve view on our part that, if a major political figure says something that is entirely untrue and ridiculous, the press would treat it as untrue and ridiculous.”

If you a subscriber you can read the whole article here. If you’re not, well then, the newsstand awaits!

.

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • RazorsEdge

    Glynnis,

    Are you sure about this? Your comment -[that the White House thought it too idiotic to deal with] I’m not sure, but maybe WH was speaking of the media in that comment.

    Either that or you insinuating WH lied about not addressing per your headline. Pres. Obama addressed death panels countless times including in his 1st joint congressional speech where millions of Americans watched.

    No So called Death-Panels

    Townhall Obama Not in favor of death panels remember young girl asked Pres Obama. Her mother was Obama campaign supporter

    Joint Congress speech Death panels a lie

    The WH comments you supplied to me read WH (Obama) thought it was to absurd for the “Media” to address. But WH addressed death panels.

    The way you wrote the article it reads to me that you thought WH did not address because you wrote:

    [thought it too idiotic to deal with. One imagines they (WH) won’t be making that same mistake going forward.]

    Comment

  • ChrisNH

    Lib political columnists must seethe when their works get put behind a ‘paywall.’ They end up preaching to a smaller choir…their own. The New York Times has thankfully taken this step, and we can only hope The Boston Globe soon follows.

  • felixw

    Of course, it’s hard for Obama to address any issues raised by the right, since he hasn’t given a press conference since July, and refuses to do interviews with Republican journalists.

  • TfT

    I don’t know why anyone would pay for an article that is clearly filled with falsehoods that are so easily debunked by a quick google search.

    “Interestingly, there’s also an admission that one of the reason’s Sarah Palin’s ‘death panel” remark was able to take hold is that the White House thought it too idiotic to deal with.”

    Maybe it’s semantics; in that “deal with” doesn’t mean “talk about” or “address” or something, because surely the WH did address it.

  • BJL411

    “President Obama and the media is getting The New Yorker treatment this week.”

    “is”?

    jesus christ proof read your articles..

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Self-Serve Advertising | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram