1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough

Sarah Palin Breathes Life Back Into Death Panels Just In Time For Oprah

» 8 comments

2069_galleryThere is still a week to go before Sarah Palin’s much-anticipated interview with Oprah Winfrey next Monday, which will also likely serve as the starting shot in the Sarah Palin media blitz/beginning days of the 2012 campaign season that is sure to last till Christmas.

No doubt Oprah has been working on her interview questions for quite some time now (presumably since August 29, 2008), but it will be interesting to see which way, if any, Palin attempts to point the headlines ahead of her headline-making interview. As of today, the money appears to be on “death panels.”

In a posting on her Facebook page this weekend titled ‘The Pelosi Bill Was Rammed Through on Saturday, But Sunday’s Coming’ (side note: that is a great hed) (side note #2: if we are allowed to vote via Facebook in 2012 Palin is going to have an edge on the competition) Palin had this to say:

Now we can only hope that Rep. Stupak’s amendment will hold in the final bill, though the Democratic leadership has already refused to promise that it won’t be scrapped later. We had been told there were no “death panels” in the bill either. But look closely at the provision mandating bureaucratic panels that will be calling the shots regarding who will receive government health care. Look closely at provisions addressing illegal aliens’ health care coverage too.

She alluded to the infamous (and fictitious) panels again in a pro-life speech in Wisconsin, that Politico’s Jonathan Martin apparently attended despite the fact it was closed to the press. Per Politico:

The former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee asserted that if policy-makers don’t believe a child in the womb is valuable, then “perhaps the same mind-set applies to other persons.”

“What may they feel about an elderly person who doesn’t have a whole lot of productive years left…In order to save government money, government health care has to be rationed… [so] than this elderly person that perhaps could be seen as costing taxpayers to pay for a non-productive life? Do you think our elderly will be first in line for limited health care? And what about the child who perhaps isn’t deemed normal or perfect per someone’s subjective measure of their use or questionable purpose in the eyes of a panel of bureaucrats making our health care decisions for us.”

The Death Panel meme has certainly been a successful one thus far for Palin, moreover it’s probably a preview of the sort of campaigning we can expect to see from the former Governor going forward, but reviving it so close to her big Oprah interview (not the mention the Barbara Walters one shortly thereafter) makes one wonder if she is not setting herself up for a extra thorough vetting on national TV come next week.

Follow us on Twitter.

Sign up for Mediaite's daily newsletter.

Email Twitter Facebook Digg Reddit Stumble Upon Yahoo Buzz LinkedIn Tumblr Delicious
  • TfT

    “An extra thorough vetting on national TV” … haha. If only the media would actually read and vet the Pelosiplan rather than Palin. Nah, it will never happen.

    “If you like your current insurance, you can keep it” is a big fat lie. Why not vet Obama’s statement rather than Palin? (Never mind, it was a silly question on my part).

  • JimAK

    1. Palin didn’t ask to close the Wisconsin event, the organizers did because they wanted keep the focus on the message rather than hosting a media circus.

    2. Pelosi’s health care bill still has the Comparative Effectiveness Panel included. From HotAir: The language establishing it takes up 22 pages of the bill (pages 739-760), and it does include experts on “health economics”. It doesn’t explicitly give government the power to dictate treatments — in fact, it does explicitly say that federal officers cannot dictate them — but findings by this panel will be used as baselines for payment by insurers, including the federal government, when it comes to deciding what options for treatment are available to whom. After all, comparative effectiveness is explicitly a rationing process. If it’s in the bill, it means that Pelosi plans on cost savings through rationing, which is really no surprise at all.

  • ImNotBlue

    If Palin said it, it must be untrue… no further research necessary.

    It must be really easy to be a Palin-hater… you just have to disagree with everything she says, no matter the reality of the situation.

  • Ben Linus

    I’m not sure, but I think she’s talking about me in that photo. ;^)

  • bobofthemtns

    Does anyone know where to apply for a seat on this “death panel”? Sounds like interesting work.

  • bobofthemtns

    Ben Linus – GOOD ONE!!

  • Sunnyr

    Keep up the good work, Sarah. You are a WINNER! Don’t let the *astards get you down.

  • mzalia

    Sister Sarah Palin is a ‘wise Alaskan woman.’ When you go through Alaska’s cultural mill you come out with a global view of the world. That means more than Europe or Harvard, Oxford and Stanford. The Eskimos can teach you something if you are willing to listen. That happened to me.

    NOW, Tea Party folks, if you are willing to listen you will join forces with the Grassroots Progressives and take over America. Say goodbye to the European elites who gave Barack H. Obama the Nobel Peave Prize because they think that you do not have the guts to create an all-inclusive America that works for everyone.

    Just in case you are in doubt, read GEORGE WASHINGTON’S FAREWELL ADDRESS dated September
    17, 1796.

© 2012 Mediaite, LLC | About Us | Advertise | Self-Serve Advertising | Newsletter | Jobs | Privacy | User Agreement | Disclaimer | Power Grid FAQ | Contact | Archives | RSS RSS
Dan Abrams, Founder | Power Grid by Sound Strategies | Hosting by Datagram