More Liberty5 said:
Colby Hall wrote:“Yes, some cynics are sure to see this segment as hagiography, but its worth pointing out that in the age of opinion media, its sometimes much more effective to leave opinions out. Or put another way, just the facts ma’am.” Good idea Colby, why doesn’t Mediaite deliver “just the facts?” You partisans are nothing but opinions.

yes it’s opinions about cable news and it’s often against msnbc. I guess that means they have a liberal bias.

Yes, some cynics are sure to see this segment as hagiography,

I think you mean, some “cynics are sure to see this article as hagiography.”

But on the plus side, since it’s Rachel Maddow, we’re all pretty used to it.

Rachel . Yes , it’s always hard to tell where you’re coming from , little lady .

“But last night, Rachel Maddow once again showed how its done, chronicling every detail of Obama’s visit without one word of judgment, celebration or aspersion. Sometimes all you need to do is report on the events as they happen, letting the viewer make their own conclusion. Yes, some cynics are sure to see this segment as hagiography, but its worth pointing out that in the age of opinion media, its sometimes much more effective to leave opinions out. Or put another way, just the facts ma’am. ”

You’re going to have to forgive a few “cynical” folks for thinking Maddow’s treatment of this event might be more significant and laudable if it hadn’t been a kid gloves treatment of a Democratic president whose self-congratulation over this issue surely tweaks HER sense of propriety over issues of militarism, more than it does the public at large.

And we’ll try to forgive you for being so pandering and obtuse.

When one left wing organization, in this instance MEDIAite, feel the need to proffer a headline such as ” Rachel Maddow’s Restrained And Poignant Report Of Obama’s Visit To Ground Zero ” regarding the actions of one of this countries preeminent left wing bomb throwers, can only mean one thing ……..

Rachel . New career opportunities await you , Missy .

Just think . If Al Jazeera catches on here , you could be their Perky Katie Couric .

Nationman said:
yes it’s opinions about cable news and it’s often against msnbc. I

Totally false and you know it, son.

Barack Must Go said:
Rachel Maddow’s Restrained And Poignant Report Of Obama’s Visit To Ground Zero ” regarding the actions of one of this countries preeminent left wing bomb throwers, can only mean one thing ……..

They’re uncomfortable with the imagery, but not so uncomfortable that they’ll voice it on a news analysis show… and give some “right winger” a good day…

She’s just a touch stone for thoughtful journalism, is she not?….

“But last night, Rachel Maddow once again showed how its done, chronicling every detail of Obama’s visit without one word of judgment, celebration or aspersion. ”

Yes she did.

“Watch the remarkably moving report below, courtesy of MSNBC:”

It was not remarkable, nor was it moving.

Your got it right in your first comment and revealed your bias in your last comment.

I

The Lantern of Truth said:
ust think . If Al Jazeera catches on here , you could be their Perky Katie Couric .

Speaking of poignant, you can’t helped but be touched at seeing Colby laud a liberal news analyst for just running footage (sans commentary) on a Democratic president so as not to offend other liberals with ‘triumphalism’ or criticism…

THAT is how it’s done, folks….

The Lantern of Truth said:
Rachel . Yes , it’s always hard to tell where you’re coming from , little Boi .

There, fixed it for ya !

Rachel comes on here , I think , under the name jrcmi and will refute every opposing point . I’m trying to make her feel welcome by calling her honey , missy , little lady ,etc.

I’m a baaaad Lantern .

Cecelia said:
“But last night, Rachel Maddow once again showed how its done, chronicling every detail of Obama’s visit without one word of judgment, celebration or aspersion. Sometimes all you need to do is report on the events as they happen, letting the viewer make their own conclusion. Yes, some cynics are sure to see this segment as hagiography, but its worth pointing out that in the age of opinion media, its sometimes much more effective to leave opinions out. Or put another way, just the facts ma’am. ”

You’re going to have to forgive a few “cynical” folks for thinking Maddow’s treatment of this event might be more significant and laudable if it hadn’t been a kid gloves treatment of a Democratic president whose self-congratulation over this issue surely tweaks HER sense of propriety over issues of militarism, more than it does the public at large.

And we’ll try to forgive you for being so pandering and obtuse.

I suppose we’ll never know how “fair and balanced” the treatment might be since W couldn’t be bothered to attend.

More Liberty5 said:
Colby Hall wrote:
“Yes, some cynics are sure to see this segment as hagiography, but its worth pointing out that in the age of opinion media, its sometimes much more effective to leave opinions out. Or put another way, just the facts ma’am.”

Good idea Colby, why doesn’t Mediaite deliver “just the facts?” You partisans are nothing but opinions.

More than ample space is afforded to Rightist Reactionaries to bleat, kvetch, moan and whine in an effort to set the record, as they see it, right. All the Marys in Heaven, just view the bleating, kvetching, moaning and whining of INB, LOT (thrice), Cecelia (thrice, as well), BMG, Nutso (twice) and CC.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
I suppose we’ll never know how “fair and balanced” the treatment might be since W couldn’t be bothered to attend.

Of course, had he been there, you (and the left) would have complained that he was trying to “steal the spotlight.”

At least for once, Royal, just admit that you would have constructed a no-win situation for him and this event.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
I suppose we’ll never know how “fair and balanced” the treatment might be since W couldn’t be bothered to attend.

Of course we know.

THAT scenario would have rendered the “without one word of judgment, celebration or aspersion” Rachel Maddow ode to poignant journalism even more necessary.

ImNotBlue said:
At least for once, Royal, just admit that you would have constructed a no-win situation for him and this event.

Surely you know by now that whatever the amenable dog treats tossed by TRRK, they are taken back by one of his dirty work sockpuppets post haste.

ImNotBlue said:
Of course, had he been there, you (and the left) would have complained that he was trying to “steal the spotlight.”

At least for once, Royal, just admit that you would have constructed a no-win situation for him and this event.

No, I wouldn’t have been. I think it would have been appropriate. W is just to thin-skinned. Always has been. That doesn’t make him evil, however. Just a sinner tripped up by pride. In that, we are all like W.

But did she mention this….
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2011/05/wtf-at-wtc-obama-has-american-flag.html

http://michellemalkin.com/2011/05/06/just-wondering-why-was-american-flag-removed-from-ground-zero-yesterday/

And leaked video from OBL’s watery grave captured
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfF1vkMQ0h0&feature=youtu.be

Cecelia said:
Surely you know by now that whatever the amenable dog treats tossed by TRRK, they are taken back by one of his dirty work sockpuppets post haste.

Liar.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
More than ample space is afforded to Rightist Reactionaries to bleat, kvetch, moan and whine in an effort to set the record, as they see it, right. All the Marys in Heaven, just view the bleating, kvetching, moaning and whining of INB, LOT (thrice), Cecelia (thrice, as well), BMG, Nutso (twice) and CC.

Actually, moaning and kvetching accurately describes your negative characterizations of poster’s commentary, rather than the observations and analysis that these posters make about the thread topic.

ImNotBlue said:
Of course, had he been there, you (and the left) would have complained that he was trying to “steal the spotlight.”

That would have been the lib talking point for the next week or two.

THE REAL ROYAL KING said:
Cecelia said:
Surely you know by now that whatever the amenable dog treats tossed by TRRK, they are taken back by one of his dirty work sockpuppets post haste.

Liar.

Trust me. Being called a liar by you, is hardly as insulting as your assumption that after years of seeing you in action, we’d have no inkling of your methods.

Cecelia said:
Surely you know by now that whatever the amenable dog treats tossed by TRRK, they are taken back by one of his dirty work sockpuppets post haste.

So true. I think he may be up to 50 or so puppets now.

notsofast said:
So true. I think he may be up to 50 or so puppets now.

Yeah, TRRK doesn’t merely assume that people are too stupid to see through him, he’s angry and insulted when they are not…

More Liberty5 said:
Colby Hall wrote:
“Yes, some cynics are sure to see this segment as hagiography, but its worth pointing out that in the age of opinion media, its sometimes much more effective to leave opinions out. Or put another way, just the facts ma’am.”

Good idea Colby, why doesn’t Mediaite deliver “just the facts?” You partisans are nothing but opinions.

You do know that they aren’t a “news” site, but a blog with lots of bloggers discussing the political and media landscapes. (Hence, the TV, Online, Print buttons as opposed to World, Local, and Entertainment buttons you tend to see on news sites.) I think it may just be me since I come here expecting hear opinion and not so much facts. I’d do a CNN.com or something to that effect for that. (No, I didn’t include MSNBC.com or FOXNEWS.com or even HuffPost to be the place I go for facts.)

notsofast said:
So true. I think he may be up to 50 or so puppets now.

How many do you have, DING DONG?

My bad…Just updated..
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/05/06/no-obama-didnt-remove-american-flag-from-ground-zero/

Robert is a big businessman in Austin .
He has the hair salon ( three chairs )

Chair one : Bobbi
Chair two : Armando
Chair three : BFD – new stylist and special friend of Armando’s

Shampoo boy : Ernesto
Manicurist : skyfet

In the corner of the salon , Robert has opened his typewriter repair business .

He has allowed BFD to sell his used hubcaps in the other corner .
(If you need a certain model hubcap , tell BFD and he have it for you in 2-3 days .

Jihadists and illegal aliens welcome .

No Mormons or crackers welcome here .

notsofast said:
Totally false and you know it, son.

you’re a moron, a quick search on msnbc, odonell, cenk uygur, ed schultz maddow or anything to do with msnbc on this site will show that I’m right. I’m right and you know it bro.

Cecelia said:
Yeah, TRRK doesn’t merely assume that people are too stupid to see through him, he’s angry and insulted when they are not…

HA !

I love her gigantic Liberal Brian!

notsofast said:
So true. I think he may be up to 50 or so puppets now.

nutsofast said:
How many do you have, DING DONG?

make that 51.

Btw people, to truly understand what a pathetic, disturbed, profane, petulant little child the RRK really is, just look at the comments posted by Garth and Dirk- they are also the RRK!

notsofast said:
make that 51. Btw people, to truly understand what a pathetic, disturbed, profane, petulant little child the RRK really is, just look at the comments posted by Garth and Dirk- they are also the RRK!

Don’t forget Call Me Ishmael and SarahP.

Cancon2 said:
I love her gigantic Liberal Brian!

Yeah, Brian Williams is alright…

The Lantern of Truth said:
Don’t forget Call Me Ishmael and SarahP.

I didn’t know he was those, but I knew he was Ted, Iris, and Michelle for Leavenworth, Kansas. LOL

notsofast said:
I didn’t know he was those, but I knew he was Ted, Iris, and Michelle for Leavenworth, Kansas. LOL

He’s quite insane.

nutsofast said:
How many do you have, DING DONG?

And I thought NOTHING could top your masterful use of “SON”!!!!!!!!111 I predict that “DING DONG” will be the HOT NEW INSULT for gutless libs leading up to the 2012 election!!!!!!!111 Can’t wait for Palin to use it against the 0bamessiah in their first DEBATE!!!!!!!1111

nutsofast said:
How many do you have, DING DONG?

Wait a second, is this some FAKE PERSONA designed to MOCK True American Patriots?!?!?111 This is an OUTRAGE and I demand that you be BANNED immediately!!!!!!!111

Karl Spensen said:
Wait a second, is this some FAKE PERSONA designed to MOCK True American Patriots?!?!?111

My guess is, yes, you are.

Nationman said:
you’re a moron, a quick search on msnbc, odonell, cenk uygur, ed schultz maddow or anything to do with msnbc on this site will show that I’m right. I’m right and you know it bro.

LOL

Resorts to petulant childish name calling.

You lost loser!

Nationman said:
a quick search on msnbc, odonell, cenk uygur, ed schultz maddow or anything to do with msnbc on this site will show that I’m right. I’m right and you know it bro.

Prove it, son.

You made the claim, now prove it or stop drinking your daily BHO Kool-Aid!

Karl Spensen said:
Wait a second, is this some FAKE PERSONA designed to MOCK True American Patriots?!?!?111 This is an OUTRAGE and I demand that you be BANNED immediately!!!!!!!111

That’s RRK, son.

Rachel rocks. She is simply the most brilliant pundit on TV, and she has a lot of detractors because of that.

So this thread has devolved into a name-calling, mud-slinging fiasco, no longer relevant to the subject, but what the heck, that’s what the Internet is for, learning, education and oh, yes, personal attacks. Have fun, y’all.

Nationman said:
yes it’s opinions about cable news and it’s often against msnbc. I guess that means they have a liberal bias.

Yeah, son, they are so, so anti-MSNBC, that’s why ads promoting MSNBC keep popping up on my screen when I’m on Mediaite. I guess networks that are constantly “bashed” by Mediaite feel their advertising dollars can best be spent by advertising on a site that is “often against MSNBC.”

LOL

Try again, you failed.

SOMETIMES? SOMETIMES all one needs to do is report on events as they happen? SOMETIMES???

This is a pretty good time-line of the WH walk-backs.

Hopefully, Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh will say more about the way the White House FUBAR’d the very thing it had the most control over, so you’ll see that ‘heinously unfair’ angle covered here as well…

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/06/bin-laden-killing-white-house-pentagon-cia-botched-storyline/

Karl Spensen said:
Wait a second, is this some FAKE PERSONA designed to MOCK True American Patriots?!?!?111 This is an OUTRAGE and I demand that you be BANNED immediately!!!!!!!111

BWAAAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

notsofast said:
That’s RRK, son.

BWAAAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Think again Turdbucket,

BWAAAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

I Win
YOU LOSE

SON!!!!!

SPIKING THE FOOTBALL….

“Obama in NYC for measure of 9/11 closure”

A crass, tasteless, offensive, shameful VICTORY-LAP CAMPAIGN-FOR-RE-ELECTION show from”You Lie!” hussein.

Interesting fact: although “You Lie!” hussein has been in office for more than two (disastrous) years, and the suspected location of osama has been known for months (he’s lived in that compound for more than six years), osama is killed ONLY AFTER “You Lie!” begins his re-election campaign, ensuring maximum campaign publicity.

Anybody wanna buy an “obozo killed osama” tea-shirt? All proceeds go to “You Lie!”‘s re-election campaign.

BTW: “obozo killed the US economy” and “obozo killed US jobs” T-shirts are NOW ON SALE by Americans who want to TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY. All proceeds go to restoring America’s greatness.

THIS is also “how it’s done” by Maddow. Try to not be such a fanboy Colby…

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2011/05/05/maddow-belatedly-realizes-fort-hood-massacre-was-terrorism-after-all

The boogaloo has officially been replaced by the Osama Bounce, altogether now……..!

Jax_n_Jill said:
And leaked video from OBL’s watery grave captured
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfF1vkMQ0h0&feature=youtu.be

.
That was hysterical.

Thank you!

Cecelia said:
a kid gloves treatment of a Democratic president whose self-congratulation over this issue

Maybe he should have landed on an aircraft carrier with a MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner on it and shot a campaign commercial – all at taxpayers’ expense. No, wait . . . that’s been done.

Bush’s self-serving display occurred under somewhat similar circumstances – except that the “mission” was far from “accomplished.” His swaggering chest-thumping stands in vivid and embarrassing contrast to the allegedly “arrogant” Obama’s restraint.

Cecelia said:
I

Speaking of poignant, you can’t helped but be touched at seeing Colby laud a liberal news analyst for just running footage (sans commentary) on a Democratic president so as not to offend other liberals with ‘triumphalism’ or criticism…

THAT is how it’s done, folks….

Your right-wing talking points about liberal views of “triumphalism” are largely illusory.

Conservatives are trying to convince themselves and each other that a “liberal” president can’t perform decisive, effective actions. They’re failing badly.

Clodorado_Conservative said:

The Lantern of Truth said:
Rachel . Yes , it’s always hard to tell where you’re coming from , little Boi .

There, fixed it for ya !

You misspelled a THREE-LETTER WORD.

jdubbellu said:
when did ensign crusher get into politics?

Around the time you should’ve realized you’re a homophobic creep..

notsofast said:

ImATool said:
Of course, had he been there, you (and the left) would have complained that he was trying to “steal the spotlight.”

That would have been the lib talking point for the next week or two.

Nonsense. Obama invited Giuliani, as well, who was treated graciously. The only complaints I’ve heard about Rudy were from the cons.

I think Bush was worried about negative reactions from people who have come to realize that he bears a portion of the blame for what happened. His August ’01 Presidential briefing (“Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the U.S.”) – and his apparent inaction on that briefing – has become widely known.

Bush took the longest presidential vacation IN HISTORY after that briefing, appearing to avoid returning to D.C. until after the 9/11 attacks.

The Lantern’s “pilot light” has obviously gone out . . . assuming it was ever “lit.”

notsofast said:
Yeah, son, they are so, so anti-MSNBC, that’s why ads promoting MSNBC keep popping up on my screen when I’m on Mediaite. I guess networks that are constantly “bashed” by Mediaite feel their advertising dollars can best be spent by advertising on a site that is “often against MSNBC.”

LOL

Try again, you failed.

.
Is there any way to stop that?

I haven’t noticed any rhyme or reason for when it happens but it is damn annoying.

share with you a very good website

http://www.legendstrade.com

notsofast said:
Prove it, son. You made the claim, now prove it or stop drinking your daily BHO Kool-Aid!

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-walrus-underwater-rush-limbaugh-is-just-bitter-obama-caught-bin-laden/
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-appears-to-hold-obama%e2%80%99s-ground-zero-trip-to-a-different-standard-than-bush/
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-walrus-underwater-rush-limbaugh-is-just-bitter-obama-caught-bin-laden/
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/that-was-fast-lawrence-odonnell-uses-bin-ladens-death-to-berate-bush/
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/some-on-cnn-panel-think-msnbcs-lawrence-odonnell-attacking-nbc-was-for-publicity/
http://www.mediaite.com/online/keith-olbermann-dishonestly-explains-his-se-cupp-planned-parenthood-tweet/
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbcs-cenk-uygur-spends-half-of-his-show-on-donald-trump/
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbcs-cenk-uygur-won%e2%80%99t-read-chart-that-says-black-separatists-are-a-hate-group/
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cenk-uygur-drives-economist-nuts-claiming-gop-midterm-victory-a-sign-america-is-liberal/
you want more? once again not so fast is wrong, big surprise.

Cancon2 said:
I love her gigantic Liberal Brian!

Jaeluos?

Karl!!!111 A great Amurrikin who understands the true conservative mind(???)!!!111

MerryMarjie said:
Rachel rocks. She is simply the most brilliant pundit on TV, and she has a lot of detractors because of that.

So this thread has devolved into a name-calling, mud-slinging fiasco, no longer relevant to the subject, but what the heck, that’s what the Internet is for, learning, education and oh, yes, personal attacks. Have fun, y’all.

Any threads about RM usually START with name-calling, homophobia and generally ignoring the actual substance of the article at-hand. None of the cons here could argue with the substance of RM’s story; the only “rocks” they had left to throw at her were names, mud, homophobia, etc.

Cecelia said:

Hopefully, Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh will say more about the way the White House FUBAR’d the very thing it had the most control over

Cons like Beck, Limbaugh . . . and YOU . . . have their panties in a knot, trying desperately to deny that the Obama administration accomplished a victory for justice and for the country.

How un-American are you guys?

nitsowit said:
Turdbucket

You really ought to consult a mental health professional about that anal/fecal fixation of yours.

If you wonder why the neighbors chase their kids indoors when you walk by . . . don’t.

TeaPartyPAIDtriot said:
A crass, tasteless, offensive, shameful VICTORY-LAP CAMPAIGN-FOR-RE-ELECTION show from Dumbya.

Since you were obviously referring to Bush’s carrier-deck photo op/taxpayer-paid campaign commercial shoot, I corrected your post.

Do the Republicans pay you per-word or per-post for your ridiculously partisan buffoonery?

notsofast said:
LOL Resorts to petulant childish name calling. You lost loser!

pot. kettle. black.

notsofast said:
Prove it, son. You made the claim, now prove it or stop drinking your daily BHO Kool-Aid!

you still looking for obama’s birth certificate bro?

jrcmi said:
jrcmi says:
May 6, 2011 at 3:21 pm jrcmi(Quote)
Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

jrcmi said:
Since you were obviously referring to Bush’s carrier-deck photo op/taxpayer-paid campaign commercial shoot, I corrected your post.

I love how you pathetic libs always tell “half” of a story, son.

That carrier had returned to the US AFTER having completed its “mission” in Iraq. Hence, the carrier’s crew posted a banner saying “Mission Accomplished.”

Son, I CORRECTED YOUR POST!

LOL

Nationman said:
you still looking for obama’s birth certificate bro?

you are a loser son, and I proved it!

LOL

Nationman said:
Nationman says:
May 6, 2011 at 3:59 pm Nationman(Quote)
Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Yeah, son, they are so, so anti-MSNBC, that’s why ads promoting MSNBC keep popping up on my screen when I’m on Mediaite. I guess networks that are constantly “bashed” by Mediaite feel their advertising dollars can best be spent by advertising on a site that is “often against MSNBC.”

LOL

Try again, you failed.

nutsofast said:
BWAAAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

BWAAAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Think again Turdbucket,

BWAAAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

I Win
YOU LOSE

SON!!!!!

Sorry, Carl, AKA RRK, I work alone!

you’re idiotic statement:

notsofast said:
Yeah, son, they are so, so anti-MSNBC, that’s why ads promoting MSNBC keep popping up on my screen when I’m on Mediaite. I guess networks that are constantly “bashed” by Mediaite feel their advertising dollars can best be spent by advertising on a site that is “often against MSNBC.” LOL Try again, you failed.

my original statement:

Nationman said:
yes it’s opinions about cable news and it’s often against msnbc. I guess that means they have a liberal bias.

did you look at the articles? they were definitely critical of msnbc. you are probably the dumbest person I’ve ever encountered. Obviously they can be critical of msnbc because they have actually been critical of msnbc, ad dollars and all.

notsofast said:
you are a loser son, and I proved it! LOL

no, no you didn’t.

notsofast said:
I love how you pathetic libs always tell “half” of a story, son. That carrier had returned to the US AFTER having completed its “mission” in Iraq. Hence, the carrier’s crew posted a banner saying “Mission Accomplished.” Son, I CORRECTED YOUR POST! LOL

you might have actually been making a point here except that it’s null and void considering that bush declared all major combat operations in Iraq were at an end.

Nationman said:
did you look at the articles? they were definitely critical of msnbc. y

And what was said in THIS article, son?

“Watch the remarkably moving report below, courtesy of MSNBC:”

And what was said in this article, son?

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-walrus-underwater-rush-limbaugh-is-just-bitter-obama-caught-“bin-laden/

They were so, so, negative, they said this about matthews:

“Last night Bill O’Reilly seemed to agree with Matthews, but without naming names, arguing that conservative criticism of Obama on this issue would be “crazy.” Matthews, by comparison, proved he certainly has a unique style by not only specifically calling Rush out, but also comparing him to a huge sea creature.”

Yeah, that’s really negative, son!

LOL

Nationman said:
void considering that bush declared all major combat operations in Iraq were at an end.

They were son- the rest was insurgency- no armed forces to fight!

Try again!

notsofast said:
And what was said in THIS article, son? “Watch the remarkably moving report below, courtesy of MSNBC:” And what was said in this article, son? http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-walrus-underwater-rush-limbaugh-is-just-bitter-obama-caught-“bin-laden/ They were so, so, negative, they said this about matthews: “Last night Bill O’Reilly seemed to agree with Matthews, but without naming names, arguing that conservative criticism of Obama on this issue would be “crazy.” Matthews, by comparison, proved he certainly has a unique style by not only specifically calling Rush out, but also comparing him to a huge sea creature.” Yeah, that’s really negative, son! LOL

good you forgot this one: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbcs-cenk-uygur-spends-half-of-his-show-on-donald-trump/
“In this case, Uygur spends the first segment of his show talking about the Birther issue with Bill Press and Pat Buchanan (whom Uygur notes used to co-host their own 6pm show on MSNBC), and while they all do a decent job of dismissing the craziness, they neglect to mention that the President can’t release his original birth record, whether he wants to or not. When the second segment came on, I thought, “Really? Do we really need another 12 minutes on Trump?”

notsofast said:
And what was said in THIS article, son? “Watch the remarkably moving report below, courtesy of MSNBC:” And what was said in this article, son? http://www.mediaite.com/tv/chris-matthews-walrus-underwater-rush-limbaugh-is-just-bitter-obama-caught-“bin-laden/ They were so, so, negative, they said this about matthews: “Last night Bill O’Reilly seemed to agree with Matthews, but without naming names, arguing that conservative criticism of Obama on this issue would be “crazy.” Matthews, by comparison, proved he certainly has a unique style by not only specifically calling Rush out, but also comparing him to a huge sea creature.” Yeah, that’s really negative, son! LOL

and this one: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-appears-to-hold-obama%e2%80%99s-ground-zero-trip-to-a-different-standard-than-bush/
“So now all of a sudden a trip to Ground Zero has no political implications whatsoever, and along with Bin Laden’s death, serves as a reminder of Obama’s unparalleled national security experience? Maybe it’s too cynical to point out the disconnect between the reaction to Bush’s and Obama’s encounters with 9/11 remembrance, when Bin Laden’s death has now made everyone feel so patriotic. Yet if that’s case, let us never forget that moving forward remembering the victims of 9/11 should never again be considered politically exploitative if a Republican is the one suggesting it.”

Nationman said:
good you forgot this one: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbcs-cenk-uygur-spends-half-of-his-show-on-donald-trump/

Son, that’s under the “Columnist” site and few go there.

Try again!

notsofast said:
Son, that’s under the “Columnist” site and few go there. Try again!

making excuses for why you are wrong i see.

notsofast said:
Son, that’s under the “Columnist” site and few go there. Try again!

in fact this article is under columinists as well, man you just keep getting lower.

notsofast said:
They were son- the rest was insurgency- no armed forces to fight! Try again!

no they weren’t, in fact most of the deaths occured after he gave that speech.

Nationman said:
in fact this article is under columinists as well, man you just keep getting lower.

Nope, son, its under TV. Try again.

I declared you a liar- my decision is final!.

Nationman said:
no they weren’t, in fact most of the deaths occured after he gave that speech.

Yes they were, son, and your lying does not change that. THERE WERE NO IRAQI MILITARY FORCES TO FIGHT> It was insurgents they fought, son.

notsofast said:
Nope, son, its under TV. Try again. I declared you a liar- my decision is final!.

it says right at the top in yellow, COLUMNISTS. are you really this dense?

notsofast said:
Yes they were, son, and your lying does not change that. THERE WERE NO IRAQI MILITARY FORCES TO FIGHT> It was insurgents they fought, son.

and the combat WAS NOT OVER. It didn’t end, the combatants changed but there was still combat in iraq.

notsofast said:
Yes they were, son, and your lying does not change that. THERE WERE NO IRAQI MILITARY FORCES TO FIGHT> It was insurgents they fought, son.

and even if technically he was correct, it doesn’t change how naive or deceitful he was in doing that.

Nationman said:
and the combat WAS NOT OVER.

LOL

Son, he aid “Major Combat” was over. THERE WERE NO IRAQI MILITARY FORCES TO FIGHT. NO UNIFORMED ARMY WAS LEFT!

Now stop lying and this column is listed under TV as we speak, so stop trying to lie again.

Nationman said:
it doesn’t change how naive or deceitful he was in doing that.

Prove he was deceitful.

Come on, you lied again, now try to prove it.

notsofast said:
LOL Son, he aid “Major Combat” was over. THERE WERE NO IRAQI MILITARY FORCES TO FIGHT. NO UNIFORMED ARMY WAS LEFT! Now stop lying and this column is listed under TV as we speak, so stop trying to lie again.

so you would say that major combat was in fact over? That there weren’t huge casualities after that? It is under tv, just as the cenk story was under tv at a certain point. They moved it into columns to make way for newer stories, that’s how the site works. There is also a huge yellow label at the top that says columnists. stop trying to weasle your way out of this, you were wrong.

notsofast said:
Prove he was deceitful. Come on, you lied again, now try to prove it.

There was a reason i put the or in between those words. I don’t have proof that he was deceitful, yet if it wasn’t deceit that drove him to do that then it was naivety. stop trying to put words in my mouth you lying sack of uselessness.

Nationman said:
That there weren’t huge casualities after that?

That doesn’t mean that “Major Combat” wasn’t over, son.

Try again.

notsofast said:
That doesn’t mean that “Major Combat” wasn’t over, son. Try again.

lol wut? was there fighting in IRaq after he declared an end to major combat, if not then he was wrong there was still major combat against insurgents. The combatants changed but the combat certainly did not end.

Nationman said:
lol wut? was there fighting in IRaq after he declared an end to major combat, if not then he was wrong there was still major combat against insurgents. The combatants changed but the combat certainly did not end.

*if so

Nationman said:
I don’t have proof that he was deceitful,

I have proof Barry was deceitful.
His WH said there was a big firefight between UBL and the Seals.

Now it is learned today that only ONE person of the 5 killed in the operation was armed. Just one- there was no “big” firefight.

Barry and his cohorts can’t get their story straight. First UBL was shooting, then he wasn’t. There were guards at the compound shooting at the Seals, then there were no guards. There was a big firefight, now only one person had a gun versus 24 heavily armed Seals.

Talk about lies!

Nationman said:
was there fighting in IRaq after he declared an end to major combat, i

LOL

Son, quote me where Bush said “all combat is over.”

Until you can do that, you are still a liar!

notsofast said:
I have proof Barry was deceitful.His WH said there was a big firefight between UBL and the Seals. Now it is learned today that only ONE person of the 5 killed in the operation was armed. Just one- there was no “big” firefight. Barry and his cohorts can’t get their story straight. First UBL was shooting, then he wasn’t. There were guards at the compound shooting at the Seals, then there were no guards. There was a big firefight, now only one person had a gun versus 24 heavily armed Seals. Talk about lies!

talk about changing the subject! seriously, you didn’t hear the cia chief say the video feed on the soldier’s helmets got cut off for 25 minutes? Of course they can’t get a perfect story, ask any lawyer human beings make terrible witnesses. They get details wrong, especially in a combat situation i can’t imagine giving a testimony about something like that.

notsofast said:
LOL Son, quote me where Bush said “all combat is over.” Until you can do that, you are still a liar!

what is the difference between major combat then? there were definitely major combat operations in iraq, ask an Iraqi veteran about falujah, and you just can’t stand the fact that the president may have been lying to you.

notsofast said:
I have proof Barry was deceitful.His WH said there was a big firefight between UBL and the Seals. Now it is learned today that only ONE person of the 5 killed in the operation was armed. Just one- there was no “big” firefight. Barry and his cohorts can’t get their story straight. First UBL was shooting, then he wasn’t. There were guards at the compound shooting at the Seals, then there were no guards. There was a big firefight, now only one person had a gun versus 24 heavily armed Seals. Talk about lies!

also, source?

notsofast said:
Nope, son, its under TV. Try again. I declared you a liar- my decision is final!.

just got moved to columnists. oh well notsosmart.

Rachel Maddow is the best all around journalist in the media. No one else come close.

notsofast said:
I have proof Barry was deceitful.
His WH said there was a big firefight between UBL and the Seals.

Now it is learned today that only ONE person of the 5 killed in the operation was armed. Just one- there was no “big” firefight.

Barry and his cohorts can’t get their story straight. First UBL was shooting, then he wasn’t. There were guards at the compound shooting at the Seals, then there were no guards. There was a big firefight, now only one person had a gun versus 24 heavily armed Seals.

Talk about lies!

What a stupid remark. You know full well that:

1) The White Hose was reporting information as they received it.

2) Early reports of incidents are almost always incorrect.

3) The White House without any outside prompting corrected the mistaken remarks.

It is obvious that you, Notsofast are the deceitful one here. How pathetic. You should be ashamed of yourself but obviously you have no shame or you would not lie much as you do.

Resistance Is Futile said:
What a stupid remark. You know full well that:

1) The White Hose was reporting information as they received it.

2) Early reports of incidents are almost always incorrect.

3) The White House without any outside prompting corrected the mistaken remarks.

LOL

Barry lied, you POS!

Nationman said:
also, source?

Try Pentagon and the WH.

LOL

man are you stupid!

notsofast said:
LOL Barry lied, you POS!

no real response? pitiful.

notsofast said:
Try Pentagon and the WH. LOL man are you stupid!

Just did a full search for that nonsense, didnt’ find it anywhere.

What…is MessNBC paying Mediaite for pop-over ads and puff pieces now?

Resistance Is Futile said:
Rachel Maddow is the best all around journalist in the media. No one else come close.

Thumbs up for making me laugh.

What makes me laugh is the distaste you sense from liberals over this wonderfully successful mission.

It’s as though they would have been more comfortable if the president had sent a team of UN trauma counselors into OBL’s lair, and persuaded to him to give himself up and then make mea culpa rounds on the cable channels.

THAT would have confirmed their view of how seriously this ‘terrorism stuff’ should have been taken, and just who are the REAL evil guys in the world (Republicans).

Personally, I only wish that the Navy Seals could have “executed’ everyone in that compound TWICE.

Rachel took pains to avoid talking about Obimbo’s support to the Muslim bid to build in the area over the objections of almost everyone. Why would she omit that? Would that have made Obimbo’s appearance at the sight seem less than sincere, and a little more contrived looking? Well now, Maddow wouldn’t want to give credence to that, would she?

CAconservative said:
Rachel took pains to avoid talking about Obimbo’s support to the Muslim bid to build in the area over the objections of almost everyone. Why would she omit that? Would that have made Obimbo’s appearance at the sight seem less than sincere, and a little more contrived looking? Well now, Maddow wouldn’t want to give credence to that, would she?

Perhaps she didn’t need to take pains because the issue of an Islamic culture center doesn’t mean jack shit?

A common failing of the obsessed is reading more into something than is actually there. As in your case, sometimes a jackass is just a jackass.

ImNotBlue said:
I think you mean, some “cynics are sure to see this article as hagiography.”

But on the plus side, since it’s Rachel Maddow, we’re all pretty used to it.

And some ignorant sots are sure to pretend they know what the word hagiography is and prove themselves fools with some off-target post.

Cecelia said:
“But last night, Rachel Maddow once again showed how its done, chronicling every detail of Obama’s visit without one word of judgment, celebration or aspersion. Sometimes all you need to do is report on the events as they happen, letting the viewer make their own conclusion. Yes, some cynics are sure to see this segment as hagiography, but its worth pointing out that in the age of opinion media, its sometimes much more effective to leave opinions out. Or put another way, just the facts ma’am. ”

You’re going to have to forgive a few “cynical” folks for thinking Maddow’s treatment of this event might be more significant and laudable if it hadn’t been a kid gloves treatment of a Democratic president whose self-congratulation over this issue surely tweaks HER sense of propriety over issues of militarism, more than it does the public at large.

And we’ll try to forgive you for being so pandering and obtuse.

And I’m convinced you know exactly what tweaks Rachel’s senses. To be honest, I’m pretty sure you don’t have a clue.

Barack Must Go said:
When one left wing organization, in this instance MEDIAite, feel the need to proffer a headline such as ” Rachel Maddow’s Restrained And Poignant Report Of Obama’s Visit To Ground Zero ” regarding the actions of one of this countries preeminent left wing bomb throwers, can only mean one thing ……..

Mediaite, a notorious centrist enabler of the wingnutariat of which you are a camp follower, is a “left wing organization?”

I realize that you don’t believe a tenth of the piffle you post, but hasn’t anyone pointed out to you that this nutso posturing you’re so fond of not only makes you look like a moron, but degrades the rhetoric around issues that you presumably care about?

In short, you stink the place out and the smell gets into the pores of your fellow fantasists.

Cecelia said:
Surely you know by now that whatever the amenable dog treats tossed by TRRK, they are taken back by one of his dirty work sockpuppets post haste.

You realize that the above statement is complete gibberish, I trust.