Shep Reports Chris Matthews Had “No Tingles” At Lunch With Pres. Obama

video

by Steve Krakauer | 4:15 pm, January 27th, 2010

» 6 comments

Shepard Smith was one of the lucky media members to attend the annual off-the-record lunch with Pres. Barack Obama today ahead of his State of the Union tonight.

He reported on the tone of the meeting, the menu and the guy sitting next to him (MSNBC’s Chris Matthews) during The Live Desk today.

Smith said it was “an hour-and fifteen-minutes of give-and-take on issues, and overall, “it was a pretty chill lunch, and very informative.”

Then he started giving a rundown of the menu (which included a ‘symphony of vegetables’ which cracked Shep up) and on his fellow journalists around the table. “That many egos in the room, we’re lucky it didn’t explode but it didn’t,” he said. Specifically: “Chris Matthews, I sat next to. No tingles that I know of.”

“Everybody seemed very relaxed,” said Smith. “We all kind of know each other or have at least seen each other, covered stories together over the years. And it’s a sort of cordial fraternity when you’re not off trying to beat everybody in the ratings.”

Also, there’s apparently a Flip video Shep took of the journalists talking before the lunch, but FNC won’t get a chance to air it: “I think Katie Couric complained so I’m not allowed to use it, but if anyone wants to come over some time I’ll show it in my living room.”

Release the Flip! Party at Shep’s house!

Here’s “Your Moment of Shep”:

—–
» Follow Steve Krakauer on Twitter

Chris Matthews, fnc, fox news, Lunch with Obama, Pres. Barack Obama, Shep Smith, shepard smith, Symphony of Vegetables

libra blue

Love Shep! I heard this, but was Shep saying that Matthews didn’t have tingles for Obama or for him? I am not sure.
roxsteady

Maybe Shep could revisit that whole “Most Trusted News” BS?

From the dailykos

Fox News: The Most Trusted Name In News?
by Steve Singiser
Wed Jan 27, 2010 at 01:33:40 PM PST

There has been a lot of buzz about a poll released yesterday by the crew over at PPP (PDF File). And the headlines all hit on a similar theme:

Poll: Fox most trusted name in news — Politico

Poll: Fox most-trusted news outlet — Boston Herald

New Poll: Majority of Americans Trust Fox — WTVD-TV (Raleigh)

There’s only one small problem. A cursory look inside the numbers reveals that, for a strong majority of Americans, the exact opposite is true. Indeed, the poll tells us quite a different story: for more than three-fifths of Americans, Fox News is the least trusted media outlet of them all.

And it’s not even close.

Fox’s poll position on the PPP poll rests solely on one thing: the fact that conservatives are evidently petrified at the thought of having their worldview challenged in any way, shape or form. Therefore, they trust Fox. And only Fox.

Look at the very telling way in which conservatives responded on the issue of trust and American media outlets:

Conservative Trust Of Media Outlets (Yes/No)–PPP Poll 1/26/10

FOX NEWS: 75/13
CNN: 22/60
ABC NEWS: 16/67
NBC NEWS: 15/66
CBS NEWS: 14/68

Contrast those results with those among liberal voters, who seem to lack the near-universal faith in the infallibility of any media outlet that conservatives clearly have for the Fox News brand:

Liberal Trust of Media Outlets (Yes/No)–PPP Poll 1/26/10

NBC NEWS: 64/22
CNN: 63/21
CBS NEWS: 56/29
ABC NEWS: 50/31
FOX NEWS: 26/66

Generally speaking, liberals have more trust than mistrust of media outlets, but nowhere near the lopsided fealty that we see from conservatives. They also, not surprisingly, find Fox News to be the least trusted news source, and by a landslide.

But what about those prized moderates? How do they perceive the major media outlets? The results would certainly appear to fly in the face of the whole “Fox is the most trusted name in news” meme:

Moderate Trust of Media Outlets (Yes/No)–PPP Poll 1/26/10

CNN: 47/31
NBC NEWS: 44/33
CBS NEWS: 41/33
ABC NEWS: 39/34
FOX NEWS: 33/48

Imagine that.

Let’s be clear: with 61% of Americans (liberals made up 14% of the poll, and moderates made up 47%), Fox News is the least trusted name in news. And they are the least trusted outlet by a decisive margin.
This confirms something that bloggers on the left have been arguing for years. The success of Fox News is not due to their superior product, nor is it the result of providing a valuable service to a center-right nation.

It stems exclusively from the fact that liberals and moderates are willing to avail themselves of the entire array of media offerings available to them, while conservatives are so convinced of their own victimhood on all matters media-related that they will pledge unwavering allegiance to a friendly media outlet.
It was a point underscored by PPP’s own Tom Jensen in his analysis of their poll:

These numbers suggest quite a shift in what Americans want from their news. A generation ago Walter Cronkite was the most trusted man in the country because of his neutrality. Now people trust Fox the most precisely because of its lack of neutrality. It says a lot about where journalism is headed.

Anyone seeking to explain the popularity of Fox News, Rush, and Beck, or conversely seeking to explain why liberal alternatives like Air America are predestined to struggle, now have some very compelling data with which to make their case.”

I knew it had to be something like that.
same2u

Good post Rox,

Fox Newsers are freaks, birthers and teabaggers whose whole identity is associated with the right wing politics of Fox News.
StewartIII

ChickaBOOMer: Katie Couric’s CNN Cameo
http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2010/01/katie-courics-cnn-cameo.html
http://www.facebook.com/people/Bob-Sillypants/1517253850 Bob Sillypants

Also, there’s apparently a Flip video Shep took of the journalists talking before the lunch, but FNC won’t get a chance to air it: “I think Katie Couric complained so I’m not allowed to use it.”

Come on Shep, since when have you been scared of the rivals?
ImNotBlue

roxsteady says:
January 27, 2010 at 5:42 pm

Yes… if you don’t include certain segments of the population (despite the fact that “Americans” means ALL Americans, not just the one’s who agree with you politically), you can change the results. Of course, that’s a pretty bigoted thing to do… you know, “not count a group of people equally,” but hey… it’s what we’ve come to expect.