Bill O’Reilly Expresses Serious Interest in Pres. Obama’s Stones

VIDEO

by Zeke Turner | 9:49 am, September 27th, 2009

» 6 comments

Man, it takes a big set of stones to be President of the United States. But those stones are nothing compared to the stones you need to fight terror in the farthest reaches of the globe. Needless to say, Obama’s stones don’t hearten Laura Ingraham.

Bill O’Reilly: Do you believe that President Obama — if all else fails — has the stones to either launch military action against iran or let israel do it?

Laura Ingraham: I, I don’t think, I don’t think — from what i heard today from his speech at the end of the day at the G20 when he was asked about Iran … what he said to the reporter was ‘hey, this isn’t a football game, I’m not interested in victory,’ and he went on to talk about the process and how he wants results. What do you mean you’re not interested in victory?! you’re interested in victory over those who seek to use terror as means of influence around the world. And so when i heard him say that was I heartened? No, I was not heartened.

barack obama, Bill O'Reilly, fox, Laura Ingraham, President Obama, Stones, The O'Reilly Factor

JimW

I think the “writers” on this site are way too occupied with everything Fox News. The minute Bill O’Reilly used the word “stones” in reference to Barack Obama, I thought, wow, another Mediaite Moment. Now, I don’t watch MSNBC, but I’ll wager my IRA that nary a minute goes by before Olbermann, Matthews, or Maddow uses the phrase “tea-bagger” referring to the scrotal sacs of conservative men.
ChuckfromTacoma

When I first started reading this post, it brought to mind how the vet offered little fake balls for my dogs when I had the neutered last year. So now I wonder, Does he have the stones and are they real?
I wonder if he got fake ones installed when she had him neutered?
Off to the Seahawks game. Have a great day.
m

It’s family values to refer to someone’s testicles.
Pam1151

@JimW I think you are right about this site being everything Fox News. What is the deal here?? By the way Jim I do watch MSNBC and will gladly make note if the three you mentioned adopt that phrase for conservative men. I certainly wouldn’t want you to miss out on that. ;o)

Now back to my football game!!
Magister

The headline seems a bit misleading. I clicked the clip and all I saw was O’Reilly asking a question by using a colloquialism and not some kind of deep meditation on the size of Obama’s “colloquials”.
Jelperman

Stones? No wonder the right-wingers call themselves TEA-BAGGERS!