…No…stop…Bill…don’t…please…no…

1. Bill also said he didn’t think Jon Stewart was one of those ” sushi-eating, latte-swilling New Yorkers”

2. I’m smelling another O’Reilly Stewart debate, and since those are actually good political debates, current republican presidential candidates take note, I’m looking forward to it

Jons right, but lets not talk about that — bill oreilly.

bill always gets owned in the end with stewart. this is gonna be fun.

 Problem is not only do most Americans agree with Stewart but most Republicans agree with him.

You lose, Bill.

spending like sheiks? Cause Medicare Part D did nothing to get us here. 

 Funny how Bill O and the rest of you conservative boobs declare Jon irrelevant but get all defensive everytime he takes one of you down.

Brilliant as always, Jon; the only subject that really gets O-Reilly and his ilk truly animated is any hint they might be forced to contribute to this country they claim to love so much, when it’s actually all about the money, theirs.

Thats just not true.  They usually have a good give and take.  Why are liberals so blinded by hate?

Yep, the 50% who don’t pay think those who do pay…….should pay more.  

When did Bill O declare Jon irrelevant?

You suck at math.

Uhh, how is that hate?

What are you talking about?! The richest 1% pay 38% of the Federal Income Tax. How is that NOT contributing?????!

Stewart knows how to blow the envy ‘dog whistle’ to get the libs moving in a collective line. The human frailty of envy(see seven deadly sins) is easy to exploit, especially in the simple-minded and those that have no true core values system. More proof that useful idiot libs are easily fooled and manipulated.

Soak The Rich !!!

*drink*

Call the wambulance – maybe they should give back the 90% of all income increases of the last decade and give it back to the middle class that have seen their income go up 0% in the last thirty years.

You have no brain cells

*drink*

Rumor is that Bill O’Reilly will be a guest on The Daily show on Wed., 9/28.

Did Stewart hurt O’Reilly’s feelings?  That guy has such a thin skin.  

 Hey don’t know if you guys saw the rest of this show and Jons interview with Mitch Daniels but if you have a chance to catch it on the daily show website its really good. Really good debate and conversation which you will not see on a regular cable news channel.

Holy shit, has Fox News seriously not backed down on this claim yet? Okay, for the 50000th time: income tax is not the only tax, the poor pay OTHER taxes.

according to TDS’s guest tab on their website he will be

http://www.thedailyshow.com/guests

Monday – Ron Paul
Tuesday – Seth Rogen
Wednesday – Bill O’Reilly
Thursday – Tony Bennett

Obama quote in 2009; ‘you don’t raise taxes in a recession.’. Anyone in the media care to ask O why you don’t raise taxes in a recession in 2009 but 24 months later you do? Didn’t think so. What an idiot. The only reason Obama is now demanding tax increases is because he know entitlements have to be cut. And if entitlements are cut, Obama has to give the liberals a sacrificial pound of flesh – more taxes from the rich (aka terrorists).

Then the hilarious battle cry that the majority of Americans want taxes raised on the rich! This just in… the majority of Americans want their neighbor to mow their grass. The majority of Americans are not rich – so why not tax the rich more when that is only question being asked. In other words, don’t tax me anymore! The top 5% of all tax payers pay approximately 60% of all collected income taxes! So 95% of all tax payers pay about 40% of all collected income taxes. So the rich definitely need to pay their fair share. After all, slightly less than 50% of all income earners pay nothing.

Obama has done zero about cutting entitlements. An he will never doma thing about it (other than say he ‘put it on the table’ behind closed doors!! This jack ass wastes over half a billion of OUR MONEY on a buddy’s solar panel factory and it bankrupts in less than two years. This does not even begin the tip of the waste iceberg. Yet the problem with the Federal Government is they need more of OUR MONEY to fix their incomparable incompetence. Fix the spending problem now. Then if you want more of OUR MONEY, at least you would sound credible. Raising taxes in the Obama depression would cripple what’s left of the economy. Everybody in Washington DC knows this. And the media keeps on covering for their man

I think the person may be speaking of their debate over the rapper Common on O’reilly’s show. A poll of Bill’s watchers said Stewart won the debate 71 to 29 percent.

TY

 What do you know.  The only conservative on this website who has to get his idiotic 2 cents in.

First of all the 50% of those who don’t pay income taxes are those who are either so poor that they don’t even make enough money to be taxed on income and the millionaires and billionaires who get a ton of subsidies and loopholes.

It’s 50% of America, not the bottom 50% you imbecile.  The rich are not paying their taxes and the poor who don’t pay taxes are so poor that they can’t afford even an income tax.

You don’t know anything.

 The thing is conservatives keep trying to spin it that its the bottom 50% when the statistics said 50% of American’s don’t pay taxes and in that very same study, it said majority of that 50% were either the rich like the millionaires and billionaires and the poor who are so poor that they don’t have enough money to pay an income tax.

So once again conservatives including people like BR, lie to try to manipulate the truth and facts.

 The richest one person is suppose to pay 38% of the federal income tax but remember they are talking about income not the amount of rich people.

Rich people have more money so therefore their tax will be a lot larger but it’s still only 35% of their income. The middle class pays the same rate as the rich but due to less money, it ends up being less but it is still the same percentage of their income.

The rich however gets tons of loopholes and tax havens so many rich people and especially corporations, pay actually a lot less due to the loopholes.

The middle class and the poor pay income taxes too, and they pay the same rate as the rich but they give less money because they make less. Some rich people who don’t use loopholes, the amount of tax money they give out is more than many people’s enire annual salaries, and many rich people’s tax returns is more than many people’s annual salaries.

But the middle class and poor pay income taxes and they don’t have the corporate welfare like the rich has and don’t have the lobbying effort as corporations do.

they contribute a hell of a lot more than you do, but it’s not enough for you.  Look in your own wallet and quit spying in others – it’s not a nice trait.

did O’Reilly take his income from the  middle class?  No – so why should he “give it back”.  What a silly statement.

No they don’t and don’t bother speaking for us.  It is disingenuous at best and a lie at worst.  Take your pick.

 Stewart is a multi-millionaire, I wouldn’t consider Stewart a person on envy.  Warren Buffet is a billioniare and makes more than Stewart and O’Reilly combined and he agrees on Tax increases for the rich. Bill Maher is a millionaire also and doesn’t matter his taxes going up.  Same with Bill Gates and so on.

These people don’t represent envy.  And I wouldn’t consider liberals which according to United States Demographics, are the most educated and the most wealthy group of people in the United States. I wouldn’t consider them envious or stupid or being manipulated, it is you that is being manipulated.

well you just proved that if BR doesn’t know anything, you know even less.

How about checking out your “facts” since your dead wrong (what a surprise!)

Bill never gets owned by Stewart.  Stewart just spins the argument and then pulls out the old “class warefare” crap and you buy.  Most of us are smart enough to know that Stewart doesn’t have a point but you are still a believer.  Remember, he’s the guy who is not pushing an agenda, just ask him.

The quote of Obama’s is correct, you don’t raise taxes in a recession. The recession has been over since June 2009. And since the recession has been over for several years, he is now asking for the rich to pay more.

And basically, the rich are waging war against the poor. The rich is waging war against Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Food Stamps. They want payroll taxes for the middle class raised, BUT they don’t want their raised.

Beatenbynonfiction, you are an idiot and have no clue what you are talking about.  Not only do you have the facts wrong but you just wasted so much time writing those huge paragraphs.

Obama has said previously that we should tax the rich back up to 39% like it was in the 1990s when we had the strongest economic growth.  But due to republicans fillibustering everything, Obama ended up caving in and passed no tax increases.  His Stimulus Plan was mostly tax cuts, he extended the Bush tax cuts.

Obama and the Democrats and even the progressives have come out with a ton of plans and proposals to cut the debt and deficits and make cuts and reforms to entitlements.  It is the republicans who refuse to cut the trillions in militarism, the trillions in defense, and the billions in Corporate Welfare.  All which could be cut also. But republicans want it there way or the highway.

And the only people calling the rich terrorists are you conservatives.  No one is calling the rich terrorists so stop putting words into our mouths.
 
And the rich don’t pay 60% of taxes, that is a complete lie.  When you exclude loopholes and subsidies which most rich pay, they make up 38% of the tax income.  However that is because they have more money. As a percentage of their own income,the middle class and poor pay the same percentage of taxes of a percentage of their income as the rich do.  But the rich have loopholes and subsidies, so most of the time they pay a much smaller percentage of income tax. That is an undeniable fact.

And don’t give me this 50% pay no income taxes because you are making it sound like its the bottom 50%. That study that you are quoting says that the majority of that 50% are the rich and the poor who don’t even make enough money to pay an income tax.  The middle class and the poor pay taxes. If the poor have enough money to pay for income taxes,they pay income taxes, the middle class pays income taxes.Everyone pays income taxes.  They pay the same amount of income taxes as the rich but since their annual salary is much smaller than the rich the amount of money as a percentage of their income is smaller than the rich but it’s the same percentage as a percentage of their income.  That is an undeniable fact.

It’s not Obama’s depression either, it was Obama that inherited a mess and economic depression and a ton of debt from the republicans and the Bush administration.  You really don’t know anything and you should get the facts right before you start typing and spamming away.

Don’t try to match wits with Jon, Bill,  Compared to him you’re unarmed.

why are you a coward ?

Spin on Bill? O’reilly?? On HIS show??? Please!

Gotta ask dude, are you rich? As in do you make over $600,000? Just want to know if you’re protecting yourself, or just playing Devil’s advocate?

O’Reilly and Stewart, and even Obama for that matter are cut from the same cloth. 

Sadly that cloth is an old cheap pair of Granny’s discarded bloomers.

Liar, Billo. Cutting Clinton’s comment is the only justification he could find. If you love America as you claim, why don’t yo pay your hare of the tax. 

Billdo,
 
You don’t want to pay USA income taxes? LEAVE.

RENOUNCE YOUR USA CITIZENSHIP. LEAVE.

Then when you Billdo go to Kentucky or Alaska or some other bass akward land, you will try to invest in the USA and get hit by the SAME tax rates you were trying to scape in the first place.

Brilliant!

lack of any meaningful rebuttal!
*drink*

I see all these libs on here who constantly whine about shared sacrifice…I personally don’t want my taxes raised, because its 3% now. But after they get 3% they will come back for more. A lib can never tell you how much is your “fair share”. Case in point. During the Carter admin, we had some of the highest tax rates in our country’s history….What was Carter talking about then….”shared sacrifice”. So Carter had a top marginal tax rate of near 70% and it still wasn’t our fair share. Once the libs can tell me what my fair share is, then and only then will I be interested in talking about tax rates.

putting rate back to 39% is not this cure all. The rate at 39% in the 90′s was not the reason we were booming. Do you really think because the fed was able to get 3% more out of the top earners is why we had economic growth? perhaps you should take and economics class. And you are incorrect, not everyone pays federal income taxes. Everyone pays payroll taxes, but not federal income taxes. The bottom 51% of earners do not pay federal income taxes (i would link to the data, but I have to get to work). In fact, many in the bottom 50% receive money back from the federal government, which means they get a check every year from the fed gov’t. To your point, everyone does pay payroll taxes, but only the top 50% are asked to pay federal income taxes.

I’ll let Krugman do the honors, not that it will make a dent:

“To point out the obvious, the rich are paying more taxes because they’re
much richer than they used to be. When middle-class incomes barely grow
while the incomes of the wealthiest rise by a factor of six, how could
the tax share of the rich not go up, even if their tax rate is falling?”

Duh

It’s only “silly” for those blissfully unaware that when the rich buy off politicos to get their taxes cut the middle class pays more – see the last thirty years when you take off the wealthy worship blinders.

Bill forgot to bring the funny or the point.

Bill made about 100K on that one show (more than twice the average American wage, in one day.)

Bill O’Reilley should respond to this prick exactly the same way he always/never responded to that other prick, Olbermann.

What is your point?

If they have an INCOME, they should pay taxes on it, regardless if that income is food stamps or any other source they never earned.

you’re really hung up on what Bill makes in your latest posts valk, why?  

Does what he says carry less weight because of what he makes?

He told you he does.  He pays 50% – you want more.  What gives you the right to want more from him than you’re willing to pay yourself?

When did Bill claim he was “just a comedian”? I missed that.

In other words, this whole “disagreement” is staged to promote his appearance. When Bill is on TDS or Stewart is on The Factor, it is no doubt a huge ratings boost…

Anyone ever consider that these spats that these two get into are totally staged to boost ratings when they appear on each others shows???

I am impreaching Bill for having a vested interest in the position that he is arguing. Bill was paid 100K by the corporate machine that he defends, just to denounce highter taxes on that machine during a single show. Higher taxes means that Bill must pay several million more of his 25-50 million dollar income to the government.

50%?

To hear the private sector talk about government waste when they pay a talking head a 100K for one hour or work, is a laugh. And you say the problem is the unions wasting money?

When did Bill admit he was full of crap about this subject? Nobody wants to tax achievement, or tax his income more than 50%. Load of crap. Nobody is claiming having the wealthy pay a little more in taxes will solve our debt issue. “Load of crap”
And someone correct if I have this wrong, but as Jon pointed out, Fleming is full of crap about his $400k being taxed before he invests. If he reinvests and buys more equipment or opens a new location, that money is no longer income.
Maybe we could look for solutions based in reality instead of superficial partisan BS of any stripe.

They obviously make deals with each other when they do stuff like this.  O’Reilly will probably go on the Daily Show and Jon will probably go on O’Reilly.  Then they’ll both talk about it for a week and O’Reilly audience members will be lured into watching the Daily Show while Daily Show audience will be lured into watching the Factor.  It’s clearly staged. 

Unlike Countdown, the Daily Show is a ratings juggernaut.  Both Daily Show and the O’Reilly Factor have a mutual exchange. 

Jon owned Governor Mitch Daniels in a debate about class warfare just the other night.  I’m pretty sure Bill O’Reilly would be considered easy game compared to one of the most fiscally conservative governors in the United States today.   

Jon usually ends up educating Bill and makes him look like an ignorant bigoted old man.

 After debating Ron Paul and Seth Rogan, Bill O’Reilly will be a breeze for Jon.

This is true.  If Bill were for real, he would show up on the Colbert Report.  

Yah, and Warren Buffett does not have a vested interest in higher taxes.  You may want to look into the ties between Buffett asking for estate taxs and Buffett’s ownership of six Life Insurance companies (which the rich use to bypass estate taxes).

Monty said: “Case in point. During the Carter admin, we had some of the highest tax rates in our country’s history….”

Here is a link to the history of the tax brackets. What you say is quite wrong. The top tax bracket had been 70%, as it was under Carter, since 1966. Before that, the last time our taxes were less than 70% on the top bracket was 1940. After Carter, and with Reagan, the top bracket came down to 50%.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_in_the_United_States

Daily Show and the O’Reilly Factor are basically copying the format of the Colbert Report. 

Talking heads and corporate honchos are like so many tulips who’s perceived value has far exceeded reality.

Daniels is a cuckold and often gets owned.

Except Buffet argues in favor of higher taxes on the rich. He thinks the rich are being given special treatment.

See ya Bill-O (hope not)

Two wars, Iraq and Afghanistan, two rounds of tax cuts which went mostly to the rich, Medicare Part D, and a war on terror remain unfunded and continue to increase the deficit.  The tax cuts alone are the greatest cause of the the increasing national debt.  All of these costs were incurred under a republican president, congress and senate. The debt limit went from 5.95 trillion to 11.3 trillion under G.Bush and the upward spending curve was set.  Most of the debt we continue to amass today was from spending begun under Bush.   

“So anyway I’d be rubbing your big boobs and getting your nipples really hard, kinda’ kissing your neck from behind…and then I would take the other hand with the falafel thing and I’d just put it on your p***y but you’d have to do it really light, just kind of a tease business…” –as quoted in a sexual harassment suit filed against him by a Fox News producer, -2004

Got that backwards, as usual…

I think we can all agree that Bill O’ Reilly FEARS Jon Stewart!! You would think with an ego such as Bill-O’s, he would have thicker skin… sure old, wrinkled and covered in age spots, but much more thicker!!

Apparently the only time you see Stewart is when O’Reilly shows an (edited) clip of his show. Stewart (and Colbert) always have a point. There is class warfare in this country, but it’s us in the middle class who are under attack. And you misspelled “warfare.”

They don’t pay income taxes, largely because they don’t have enough income (or none at all). But they pay plenty in sales taxes, in some cases nearly 10 percent. The jackass Rep. rep from LA who whines about having “only” 400,000 bucks a year to live on is a disgrace to the USA. I’m retired now and could live on his paltry leftovers for 20 years!

Let’s see some “facts” then, assuming you know what a fact is. And learn to spell, please.

Sorry, liked by mistake.

George W and Laura Bush’s got an extra 45,000 plus the first year of the Bush tax cuts, very close to my gross salary, that year. My GROSS salary.

Warren doesn’t even pay the taxes he owes.  He’s a hypocrite, like most libs.

But when President Clinton’s sexual harassment is discussed you give him a pass.  Why are you so obsessed with a talking head but unimpressed with a President of the United States committing crimes (lying to a Federal Judge) that related directly to his proven sexually harassment to someone in his office?

Not envious–just appalled at greed (another sin?). Again, talking about yourselves. Fox viewer=simple-minded. Core value system includes cheering executions. Suggest reading the Bible between the Old Testament and Revelation. Some of us took our Sunday School lessons seriously. Especially the God is love parts. The people cheering at that debate were the counterparts to the ones cheering the execution of Jesus Christ. So much for a “true core values system.” I wouldn’t change places with a single millionaire. Behind each great fortune lies a crime.

Solar factory started and okayed during Bush Administration. Raising taxes usually restores the economy. History says so, even if O’Reilly won’t.

“I just wish Katrina had only hit the United Nations building, nothing else, just had flooded them out, and I wouldn’t have rescued them.” -Bill-O-on his radio show, Sept. 14, 2005

Of course he did! The middle-class are glued to his tv and radio shows and buy tons of his books! Where else do you think he gets it?!

“But when President Clinton’s sexual harassment.”……..I thought it was mutual (Monica)

why are you a poosey ? are you and bill close ? why did bill want to do that to you? were you a tease ?
did you wear something low cut ?  did you order the lobster ?

Bill O’Reilley is honest enough to go and present himself to the world by his own name.

Jon Stewart, on the other hand, is ashamed for what and who he is, and goes by a phony name, and in addition to being phony, he is too stupid to know how to spell JOHN.

So, who are you going to believe????? 

post a link or STFU

Goodbye, Bill. We hardly knew ye.

1. Jon is the typical jewish spelling of the name John
2. Considering he legally changed his name from Jon Stuart Leibowitz to just Jon Stuart i don’t think it’s that big of a deal to shorten your name

You are right: Leibovitz (aka Jon Stewart) is a nut – jugger or otherwise – without his twenty writers and/or his trademark yelling/shouting he would be nothing more than just another liberal a-hole.

Perhaps, but he shortened his credibility and his integrity.

Your ‘goodbye’ is not only premature, it is also childish and immature.

In addition to his totally FAIR share of taxes, O’Reilley donates a large amount to charity.

How about you? 

Like James Perry and Willard Romney?

“Jon Stewart, on the other hand, is ashamed for what and who he is, and goes by a phony name…”

You tell ‘em, “Yukon Jack”

btw your liqueur sucks

Yes he said 50%.  Go look up his talking points and he explains it rather eloquently. 

what are you talking about valk?  You’ve completely lost me.  

Again, why are you hung up on what Bill makes.  Why aren’t you hung up on the sleazy football players who make a fortune, act like animals and do nothing to help their fellow man.

You realize what O’Reilly does for various charities right?  

“No one in the 50′s payed anything near 90%”? Bill Bill Bill..are you so dense you don’t know the difference between marginal and effective tax rate? Probably. 

My point wasn’t that Carter raised taxes….I said even with that tax rates that high, Carter still thought the wealthy should pay their “fair share”. Again my point wasn’t exactly to tax policy as much as it was to how liberals have no idea what “fair share” means.

Lol you really consider food stamps income. I guess their job is not starving to death.

because of the hypocrit factor. People will  genuinely give most a pass unless they’e hypocrits and they don’t deserve a pass.  You know, kinda like the holier than thou conservatives condeming everyone who doesn’t adhere to their sexual beliefs but later everyone finds out they were the one cheating on their ex.

I’m sure he will be. It’s a money maker for both..  you know the old nod, nod, wink wink thing. They are both entertainers.

exactly.

exactly,  just like professional wrestling. And they almost had you fooled.

Jon Stewart brother is the CEO of Wall Street…lol…isn’t that interesting?

But then again, if i was a power-hungry filthy rich guy i would be a socialist because socialism is nothing but monopoly…

12volt..

Thank you.  Personally, I kinda think it would be a wonderful idea for those guys that don’t want to share or help – - – to just pack up, and leave.  I wouldn’t miss O’Reilly; I don’t agree with or watch him anyway.

I would feel better without his (and others like him) weight in my country.  They aren’t producing jobs anyway so why should I want them to stay?  Do they really care whether I live or die?  No!  So, I say:  Get out and take your cookies with you.

It’s not really being a hypocrit–Clinton was tried and convicted–what else is there to say?  No one is giving him a pass.  O’Reilly, on the other hand, bought his way out of a trial and has never had to face the court of public opinion or apologize for any wrongdoing (alleged).  The only real hypocrits are people that compare the two as equal or hold Clinton up as a straw man to divert attention away from the original subject.